Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Fox Sports Pre Draft NFL Power Rankings
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
One thing for sure,  I don't envision Miami ending up anywhere near the # 7 spot when the dust settles on the season.

I like being #32.  Keep this young team under the radar and an underdog.


I didn't look past the first few slides but are the Dolphins really #7?  Why? Because they signed Suh to a ridiculous deal?

Par the course until they can prove otherwise.
Even with the Jaguars struggles in recent seasons,  there's absolutely no way they should be ranked lower than the Bucs anytime soon..   The Bucs roster from the a comparison standpoint with other NFL teams,  is horrific.   On the other hand,  the Jags roster has improved noticeably in the last year or so. 

Quote:Even with the Jaguars struggles in recent seasons,  there's absolutely no way they should be ranked lower than the Bucs anytime soon..   The Bucs roster from the a comparison standpoint with other NFL teams,  is horrific.   On the other hand,  the Jags roster has improved noticeably in the last year or so. 
 

We should be higher than Bucs and Tennessee. We were better than them last season, and we did more to improve our team in the off-season. But it doesn't matter really. We need to win some games.
Meh. We signed the best TE on the market and bolstered our OL. We went after Murray and would've pursued Cobb if he hit the market, which he didn't. I'm not sure what else they expected us to do offensive wise to grade out as the worst team in the league behind 2 teams we finished ahead of last season.
Quote:We should be higher than Bucs and Tennessee. We were better than them last season, and we did more to improve our team in the off-season. But it doesn't matter really. We need to win some games.
 

  Agreed.

 

  A solid case can also be made that the Jaguars should be ranked ahead of the Raiders as well.

 

  Matt Ryan and Julio Jones keep the Falcons from being contending with the Bucs for the bottom feeder in the NFC South and overall conference.  
Anything FOX news related is usually garbage so I take this as no exception.

For reference sake I looked up the author and came across his rankings post Super Bowl. How do we drop a spot after free agency? I dunno.

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/photos/nfl-power-rankings-super-bowl-dallas-cowboys-seattle-seahawks-new-england-patriots-020215#img_2'>http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/photos/nfl-power-rankings-super-bowl-dallas-cowboys-seattle-seahawks-new-england-patriots-020215#img_2</a>
Id put us ahead of the titans and bucs
Quote:For reference sake I looked up the author and came across his rankings post Super Bowl. How do we drop a spot after free agency? I dunno.

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/photos/nfl-power-rankings-super-bowl-dallas-cowboys-seattle-seahawks-new-england-patriots-020215#img_2'>http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/photos/nfl-power-rankings-super-bowl-dallas-cowboys-seattle-seahawks-new-england-patriots-020215#img_2</a>
 

Maybe he really likes Brian Orakpo
Never understood people making predictions prior to the draft. Isn't the draft kind of important for teams?
Quote:Never understood people making predictions prior to the draft. Isn't the draft kind of important for teams?
 

Yes it is, but the Draft typically has long term ramifications where Free Agency is more short term. I mean, very few rookies really come in and blow the place up, even though it does happen. Besides, what else do they have to write about?
At the end of the day, 30, 31 or 32, it doesn't really matter.
Meh,, IMO #s 28-32 could be determined by coin toss for positioning. Or, even just saying #28 is a group of 5 teams (Browns, Titans, Jaguars, Bucs, Raiders) could suffice.

Maybe the Redskins could be lingering there also.


Power Rank #27 (Redskins, Bucs, Jags, Browns, Titans, Raiders)


Hypothetical:

If those six teams were in a league of their own and played only each other a couple times each,, most of their records would all be around .500
Anyone want to take a shot at how the rankings should be?

 

I agree that the Jaguars shouldn't be #32.

Quote:thoughts?

 

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/photos/nfl-...2115#img_0
 

not an attack on you (i'm just venting), but I HATE websites that have lists that require you to click 30 times just to make it through the entire list.

 

what happened to just putting all the teams on one page where I can just scroll down?

 

I'm not clicking something 30 times and making my computer load that crap again and again.  

 

just a cheap trick by these website marketers
Quote:not an attack on you (i'm just venting), but I HATE websites that have lists that require you to click 30 times just to make it through the entire list.

 

what happened to just putting all the teams on one page where I can just scroll down?

 

I'm not clicking something 30 times and making my computer load that crap again and again.  

 

just a cheap trick by these website marketers
 

  I completely agree.   

 

  It often takes a long time to access the information I'm primarily interested in with that type of website.  
Quote: I completely agree.


It often takes a long time to access the information I'm primarily interested in with that type of website.
my main goal was to show where are ranking is. It was only one click lol
Pages: 1 2