01-29-2015, 06:38 AM
It is no secret the Jaguars need an infusion of experience and talent, especially on offense. One of the positions of offensive need is TE, where former first round pick Marcedes Lewis has only put together one Pro Bowl caliber year-back in 2010. Since then, Lewis has struggled mightily with injury and poor play.
It is also no secret that fans on message boards will debate the pros and cons of signing particular players at particular positions.
One such subject of debate on this board has been Broncos TE and presumably soon to be free agent Julius Thomas.
It seems the prevailing sentiment on this board towards Julius Thomas is one of understandable apprehension. The thought is Thomas looks better and is more productive than he otherwise would be because he played for one of the greatest of all time QBs in Peyton Manning, and any team that signs him would be disappointed because he would not be as productive. While he does not play a position that is readily measured by statistics, Zane Beadles seems to embody this concern, as he seemed to be way more of a liability in Jacksonville than he was in Denver, while he protected a QB that processed the defenses accurately and quickly, and distributed the ball quickly enough to minimize hits and sacks on Manning. Here, where he blocked for a novice QB in Bortles, his liabilities as a pass blocker and a run blocker are in full display, as Bortles struggles to read defenses and be decisive with the ball. The team is also placed in more running situations against defenses that don't respect the pass as they do against Manning. Beadles' shortcomings in the run game become more apparent here because of this. The fear is we would see something similar here with a Thomas signing.
After giving it some thought, I am not as apprehensive towards signing Julius Thomas as I may have been earlier for a couple of reasons.
1. Manning's greatness does not negate Thomas' physical ability. Yes, Manning's ability to dissect defenses, arm strength, accuracy and decisiveness make any receiver to which he throws better and more productive than they would be under an average to below average QB. However, Thomas would still need the ability to separate from defenders. He has the physical traits to do that. He has a long TD reception of 74 yards. His career yards per catch (11.8) is higher than Manning's TE in Indy, Dallas Clark (11.2), and is comparable to the YPC average of 8 time Pro Bowl TE Antonio Gates in three of his Pro Bowl seasons 2004 (11.9), 2008 (11.7), and 2011 (12.2). His YPC average is also higher than certain Hall of Famers Tony Gonzalez (11.4) and Jason Witten (11.1). While Marcedes Lewis also has a career average higher than all those guys, including Thomas, it is unquestioned Lewis doesn't have the productivity. Thomas is productive in all of those areas because he is physically capable of beating man coverage underneath and attacking the seams.
2. Manning's greatness may have enhanced his productivity. You are undoubtedly reading that and saying "What?!?!? That is exactly what we are talking about! He is overrated because he played for Manning. But this presumes none of the ways he benefits by playing with Manning are transferable to wherever else he may play. I don't think this is true. Manning is notorious for being hard on his receivers.
http://www.denverpost.com/kiszla/ci_2079...source=pkg
Manning is known for demanding receivers be precise in running routes and reading coverages. He doesn't throw to them if they aren't good route runners. Thomas played his first two seasons in the NFL before Manning got to Denver (that means Tebow for one of those seasons). Gates knows or should know what should make him a more productive receiving TE in the NFL having practiced with Manning for two years, and comparing it to his first two seasons.
For a QB like Bortles struggling to get his bearings in a new offense in his second year, having a safety blanket at TE who will be in place when he is supposed to be there,who can actually represent a matchup advantage against underneath coverage is crucial to his development as a passer. Thomas may never reproduce the 24 TDs he produced over the last two seasons while Bortles learns how to play the game, but it doesn't mean he can't be a reliable target and an upgrade over what we've had.
It is also no secret that fans on message boards will debate the pros and cons of signing particular players at particular positions.
One such subject of debate on this board has been Broncos TE and presumably soon to be free agent Julius Thomas.
It seems the prevailing sentiment on this board towards Julius Thomas is one of understandable apprehension. The thought is Thomas looks better and is more productive than he otherwise would be because he played for one of the greatest of all time QBs in Peyton Manning, and any team that signs him would be disappointed because he would not be as productive. While he does not play a position that is readily measured by statistics, Zane Beadles seems to embody this concern, as he seemed to be way more of a liability in Jacksonville than he was in Denver, while he protected a QB that processed the defenses accurately and quickly, and distributed the ball quickly enough to minimize hits and sacks on Manning. Here, where he blocked for a novice QB in Bortles, his liabilities as a pass blocker and a run blocker are in full display, as Bortles struggles to read defenses and be decisive with the ball. The team is also placed in more running situations against defenses that don't respect the pass as they do against Manning. Beadles' shortcomings in the run game become more apparent here because of this. The fear is we would see something similar here with a Thomas signing.
After giving it some thought, I am not as apprehensive towards signing Julius Thomas as I may have been earlier for a couple of reasons.
1. Manning's greatness does not negate Thomas' physical ability. Yes, Manning's ability to dissect defenses, arm strength, accuracy and decisiveness make any receiver to which he throws better and more productive than they would be under an average to below average QB. However, Thomas would still need the ability to separate from defenders. He has the physical traits to do that. He has a long TD reception of 74 yards. His career yards per catch (11.8) is higher than Manning's TE in Indy, Dallas Clark (11.2), and is comparable to the YPC average of 8 time Pro Bowl TE Antonio Gates in three of his Pro Bowl seasons 2004 (11.9), 2008 (11.7), and 2011 (12.2). His YPC average is also higher than certain Hall of Famers Tony Gonzalez (11.4) and Jason Witten (11.1). While Marcedes Lewis also has a career average higher than all those guys, including Thomas, it is unquestioned Lewis doesn't have the productivity. Thomas is productive in all of those areas because he is physically capable of beating man coverage underneath and attacking the seams.
2. Manning's greatness may have enhanced his productivity. You are undoubtedly reading that and saying "What?!?!? That is exactly what we are talking about! He is overrated because he played for Manning. But this presumes none of the ways he benefits by playing with Manning are transferable to wherever else he may play. I don't think this is true. Manning is notorious for being hard on his receivers.
http://www.denverpost.com/kiszla/ci_2079...source=pkg
Manning is known for demanding receivers be precise in running routes and reading coverages. He doesn't throw to them if they aren't good route runners. Thomas played his first two seasons in the NFL before Manning got to Denver (that means Tebow for one of those seasons). Gates knows or should know what should make him a more productive receiving TE in the NFL having practiced with Manning for two years, and comparing it to his first two seasons.
For a QB like Bortles struggling to get his bearings in a new offense in his second year, having a safety blanket at TE who will be in place when he is supposed to be there,who can actually represent a matchup advantage against underneath coverage is crucial to his development as a passer. Thomas may never reproduce the 24 TDs he produced over the last two seasons while Bortles learns how to play the game, but it doesn't mean he can't be a reliable target and an upgrade over what we've had.