Want to make football more exciting?
Add parity to the AFC. The NFC is exciting because you never know who's going to win it. The same teams in the AFC on the other hand keep winning. Not sure how you'd go about it, but it'd be nice to see. Maybe some rules that don't favor the QB for once.
Quote:Want to make football more exciting?
Add parity to the AFC. The NFC is exciting because you never know who's going to win it. The same teams in the AFC on the other hand keep winning. Not sure how you'd go about it, but it'd be nice to see. Maybe some rules that don't favor the QB for once.
Cyclical.
Quote:Want to make football more exciting?
Add parity to the AFC. The NFC is exciting because you never know who's going to win it. The same teams in the AFC on the other hand keep winning. Not sure how you'd go about it, but it'd be nice to see. Maybe some rules that don't favor the QB for once.
It used to be the NFC had dynasties. Remember the 1980s 49ers and 1990s Cowboys? What's so annoying is the Patriots have dominated for more than a decade, unlike previous dynasties in both conferences.
If you have a QB you are stable and more likely to win in the NFL. No more darn rule changes. The practice restrictions already make it so the stable teams with their QB in place are in better rhythm on offense.
Quote:If you have a QB you are stable and more likely to win in the NFL. No more darn rule changes. The practice restrictions already make it so the stable teams with their QB in place are in better rhythm on offense.
You are not always stable if you have a quarterback. What if he gets hurt? Then you are in chaos.
Quote:You are not always stable if you have a quarterback. What if he gets hurt? Then you are in chaos.
And if you don't have "the guy" you are stable?
I am totally against it
I believe it will lead to more overtime games and more ties ( :pinch
I swear it's all the NFL's plan to make the Jaguars the lowest scoring team in NFL history.