Quote:Actually the grammar is correct except from using a hyphen between Tebow and led
Really?
"Would of a Tebow led Cardinals beaten the Panthers" is grammatically correct?
Shouldn't the question be posed as "Would a Tebow led Cardinals team have beaten the Panthers"?
It's that "of" in there and the lack of "have", or it's contraction, that keeps throwing me off.
Then again, J-dub is the self-annointed Grammar Queen 'round here and she's quiet on it, so maybe I'm the one who's off.
No it's not proper grammar.
"Would have a Tebow-led Cardinals have beaten the Panthers" would be correct.
It's ridiculous how many people think "would of" is proper instead of "would have"
Regards...............the Chiefjag
Quote:No it's not proper grammar.
"Would have a Tebow-led Cardinals have beaten the Panthers" would be correct.
It's ridiculous how many people think "would of" is proper instead of "would have"
Regards...............the Chiefjag
Still incorrect. "Would a Tebow-led Cardinals team have beaten the Panthers?" is correct.
I'm just going to put this out there that we have differences in grammar, so I'm just going to say this is the correct British grammar!
Wouldst a Tebow ledeth Cardinals team beateth the Panth'rs?
Quote:Wouldst a Tebow ledeth Cardinals team beateth the Panth'rs?
Quote:Wouldst a Tebow ledeth Cardinals team beateth the Panth'rs?
It would be thy Panth'rs.
Quote:It would be thy Panth'rs.
They art not mine Panth'rs!