Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Quote:It turns out that when all your peers are liberals then your peer reviewed research turns out with liberal bias. Who'da thunk? Besides anyone with a functioning brain I mean.

Scientist=liberal in your 'mind?'

Here's an interesting article.  

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morni....0_strip_3

 

It seems the sea levels are rising faster than at any time in the last 6,000 years.  

Quote:You don't need a petition when the vast majority of the scientific community thinks climate change is real.


And having a PhD doesn't make you more qualified to talk about subjects outside your own field of study.

And if they say that global warming isn't happening, more than half of them are out of jobs.

 

I'm sure that doesn't skew the analysis one bit.

Quote:Scientist=liberal in your 'mind?'

When they overwhelmingly self identify as such, like newsroom staff, then yes, I always consider what they say in the perspective of their political bias.

Quote:And if they say that global warming isn't happening, more than half of them are out of jobs.

 

I'm sure that doesn't skew the analysis one bit.

 

And if it does exist, then it'll greatly affect big money corporations.  So it works both ways.

Quote:When they overwhelmingly self identify as such, like newsroom staff, then yes, I always consider what they say in the perspective of their political bias.

Even if what they 'say' is math and science.


That's smart.

Here's some good news, no matter what side of the debate you're on (assuming it's true).


 

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2...?CMP=fb_gu

Quote:Even if what they 'say' is math and science.

That's smart.

Lies, damn lies, and statistics. What they say is an interpretation of math and science, it is not pure, its corrupted by the bias of the interpreter. Thats why anthropogenic global climate change is a crock, its the Green religion preached as fact.

Quote:Lies, damn lies, and statistics. What they say is an interpretation of math and science, it is not pure, its corrupted by the bias of the interpreter. Thats why anthropogenic global climate change is a crock, its the Green religion preached as fact.

Yea, I'm gonna need a source on that one, champ.

Quote:Yea, I'm gonna need a source on that one, champ.

 

Of course you do, you need someone to tell you what to think.  :teehee:

 

The article I posted speaks to exactly this, that professional research and academia is nothing more than a liberal echo chamber. But, of course, we'll just ignore all that.

Quote:Of course you do, you need someone to tell you what to think. :teehee:


The article I posted speaks to exactly this, that professional research and academia is nothing more than a liberal echo chamber. But, of course, we'll just ignore all that.

The NY Post article you posted earlier in this thread?


I could take the time to demonstrate how your opinion piece from the Right Wing NY Post which cites an unnamed "former editor" has no bearing on the legitimacy of climate science, but I can tell you have already made your mind up about this particular subject.


I may anyways.

Quote:The NY Post article you posted earlier in this thread?


I could take the time to demonstrate how your opinion piece from the Right Wing NY Post which cites an unnamed "former editor" has no bearing on the legitimacy of climate science, but I can tell you have already made your mind up about this particular subject.


I may anyways.

He's an anti-research troll. Don't bother.

Quote:He's an anti-research troll. Don't bother.

So anyone who disagrees with ivory tower bias is a troll? Funny, because that's exactly the point I'm making; those who disagree with the conventional wisdom of the moment are "trolls" even when the conventional wisdom changes after a short time or is proven to be wrong by reality itself.

Quote:The NY Post article you posted earlier in this thread?

I could take the time to demonstrate how your opinion piece from the Right Wing NY Post which cites an unnamed "former editor" has no bearing on the legitimacy of climate science, but I can tell you have already made your mind up about this particular subject.

I may anyways.

Why not talk about the study led by the NYU professor referenced in that article instead? Because it proves my point it must be ignored or discredited as "right wing." Laughable.

Quote:Why not talk about the study led by the NYU professor referenced in that article instead? Because it proves my point it must be ignored or discredited as "right wing." Laughable.

The right winger complaining there aren't more right wingers writing papers about pyschology?


What does that have to do with a warming earth?


Laughable? Hahah, I guess so if you are too scared to even consider the truth of the matter.

Quote:Like most things coming out of a Republican's mouth it can be viewed as either misleading or a flat-out lie.

 

LOL... says the guy who fell hook, line, and sinker for Al Gore's post-loss retirement scam.

 

If you can't see that for what it is, then you're much less intelligent than you've already let on.

Quote:The right winger complaining there aren't more right wingers writing papers about pyschology?

What does that have to do with a warming earth?

Laughable? Hahah, I guess so if you are too scared to even consider the truth of the matter.

Soooooo, hes a "right winger" hmmm? Speaking of prejudice.

Quote:Soooooo, hes a "right winger" hmmm? Speaking of prejudice.

Seriously? That's all you got?

Quote:Seriously? That's all you got?

Its ok, you keep shouting into that echo chamber, you can be certain you'll always hear what you want.

Quote:Its ok, you keep shouting into that echo chamber, you can be certain you'll always hear what you want.

The science speaks for itself, friend. No echo chamber needed.


Care for me to explain it? Be advised 4th grade level math and science skills required.