Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Why Andrew Branch will not be released until his rookie deal is up.
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Barring injury, I don't think he will be gone until his rookie deal ends.

 

The stunt we use with Andre Branch is a specific part of our defense, and he fits the play perfectly. He's big, athletic, and can tackle. I think he would have had 10-13 sacks this year had we used the stunt more often earlier in the season. Thoughts?

lol, why is he ever going to be "released" if he produces 10+ QB sacks per year??  Laughing 

 

shoes. 

Thoughts?


I think it's ridiculous to hypothesize whether he will be gone before we've even played a snap of the regular season, let alone the pre-season.
Quote:Barring injury, I don't think he will be gone until his rookie deal ends.

 

The stunt we use with Andre Branch is a specific part of our defense, and he fits the play perfectly. He's big, athletic, and can tackle. I think he would have had 10-13 sacks this year had we used the stunt more often earlier in the season. Thoughts?
 

My thought is you read too much Big Cat Country.

If he has a 10-13 sack season, it would  be the first double digit sack season by a Jaguar defender since Bobby McCray.  It doesn't matter if it's stunts used to get him after the passer.  If he's getting there, the team isn't going to let that go. 

Quote:lol, why is he ever going to be "released" if he produces 10+ QB sacks per year??   Laughing

 

shoes. 
 

Why must you always make yourself look like a clown?

 

 

Quote:Thoughts?


I think it's ridiculous to hypothesize whether he will be gone before we've even played a snap of the regular season, let alone the pre-season.
 

Andrew Branch is in his 3rd year. Some think he will be cut. 

 

 

Quote:If he has a 10-13 sack season, it would  be the first double digit sack season by a Jaguar defender since Bobby McCray.  It doesn't matter if it's stunts used to get him after the passer.  If he's getting there, the team isn't going to let that go. 
 

Exactly my point. 
Quote:My thought is you read too much Big Cat Country.
I'm hardly on the site, actually. 

Quote:Why must you always make yourself look like a clown?

 
 

How is questioning why Branch would be cut after a double digit QB sack season making ME look like the clown? Seems like the person making this thread is more likely to be seen as the "clown".

Andrew Branch is the new guy, right?

 

Heard he might be wearing Blank #2 this year.

Quote:Andrew Branch is the new guy, right?

 

Heard he might be wearing Blank #2 this year.
 

yeah.....the OP can't even get his name right, yet implies others are clowns. Laughing 
Quote:Andrew Branch is the new guy, right?

 

Heard he might be wearing Blank #2 this year.
Maybe Andre is short for Andrew? 
Quote:Maybe Andre is short for Andrew? 
 

means nothing when the player doesn't go by "Andrew"...

 

Its no better than the Brian Leftwitch's/ David Jerrard's/ and the like of the past...

Quote:means nothing when the player doesn't go by "Andrew" 
Whoosh.
:mellow:

Quote:Whoosh.
 

....I guess so. 
Quote:....I guess so. 
There's no guessing.  Trust me. 
Quote:There's no guessing.  Trust me. 
 

well then what was your point? I admit it - whatever you were trying to say with that other post wooshed me. So, again. what was your point?
Quote:well then what was your point? I admit it - whatever you were trying to say with that other post wooshed me. So, again. what was your point?
 

Sarcasm, but it's lost on those who don't have the horsepower evidently. 

Quote:Sarcasm, but it's lost on those who don't have the horsepower evidently. 
 

I usually have little problem detecting sarcasm. However that post you made seemed like you were defending the OP. 

 

I'd bet there are/ were other people that read your response up there and also took it the way I did. 

 

 

If you were trying to convey sarcasm italics probably would have done a better job for a post like that. 
Quote:I usually have little problem detecting sarcasm. However that post you made seemed like you were defending the OP. 

 

I'd bet there are/ were other people that read your response up there and also took it the way I did. 

 

 

If you were trying to convey sarcasm italics probably would have done a better job for a post like that. 
Or maybe it just went over your head. 

 

I'm banking on that to be the case. 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5