05-16-2014, 03:29 AM
Quote:Gabbert will have a 10 year career in the NFL. Matt Scott will be out of football in 18 months.I sincerely doubt that.
Does that make you sad?
Quote:Gabbert will have a 10 year career in the NFL. Matt Scott will be out of football in 18 months.I sincerely doubt that.
Does that make you sad?
Quote:I sincerely doubt that.He might be in the NFL for 10 years, but I promise you it will be in a backup role or on a team with a 2-14 record (if he starts)
Quote:And Matt Scott is still a better QB than Gabbert.
Quote:And Matt Scott is still a better QB than Gabbert.
It's funny how you Gabby lovers twist things
Henne isn't better than Gabbert even tho he is, because Gabbert is young and has potentials!!@@!@
Doesn't apply for Scott who hasn't been given an actual chance? Seems like a double standard.
Quote:Gabbert will have a 10 year career in the NFL
Quote:Henne isn't better than Gabbert even tho he is, because Gabbert is young and has potentials!!@@!@You'll never find me acting as a Gabbert apologist, but Scott did a get a chance. He got a chance to stick on one of the worst QB depth charts in recent memory, and he couldn't crack the rotation over Gabbert or Henne, nor could he do enough to keep the Jags from claiming Ricky Stanzi on waivers. Couldn't do enough to make the Jaguars think he'd be a competent #3 this year, and he certainly didn't do enough to make the Jags think twice about picking up Bortles. The way I see it, he had a full training camp and seventeen weeks of regular season practices to show the Jags that he had a bright future, and he couldn't do it. That was his chance, imo. He might go Matt Moore on us and improve into a competent backup over time, but he didn't do it here.
Doesn't apply for Scott who hasn't been given an actual chance? Seems like a double standard.