AFCS is arguably the weakest division
They did sweep Jax without much difficulty at all last year, so there's not much confidence there yet.
I feel Jax has made more improvements then Indy has this offseason, but there's still a huge gap. But let's face it, Jax isn't jumping them until Jax gets a good QB to compete and a defense that can hold it's own.
Any given Sunday though. The Colts aren't anywhere near as threatening as they were under Manning, but that's a given.
Colts are still the best team in the division (although if Houston gets a QB) and they could still get better. I still don't know why the colts traded for T rich but still gotta pay them respect because they are on top of the division. I'd like to think we will play them much more competitively this season though.
I look at the Colts as the toughest team in the division. No, they are not juggernauts, and in fact, they play pretty awful in a lot of games. Luck is a clutch QB though, and they always seem to get some lucky break or some weird call on the field that puts them back in most games. That's what makes them tough. No matter how bad you think they are beat, they always get themselves back in it toward the end of the game. You can never count them out of any game.
Luck isn't Manning and I don't see him ever getting close to that level, therefore they are not to be feared in the same way they were in Jugheads day.
They may be the best in the AFCS this year, but that's not exactly a ringing endorsement.
I don't fear those [BAD WORD REMOVED] [BAD WORD REMOVED] [BAD WORD REMOVED] [BAD WORD REMOVED].
I think I made myself clear.
Quote:What I said is true. He IS average. LOL.
you should probably just stop watching NFL football
He's above average and will probably be above that soon. Credit where credit is due.
Quote:you should probably just stop watching NFL football
Not worth arguing with him, he's a blind troll.
Well luck isn't average, i'd say he's "very good" Not great, not elite by any stretch at this point but he's certainly good. He doesn't scare me like Peyton/Rodgers/Brady do.
Quote:At this point in his career Andrew Luck is an average QB in the NFL.
<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/quarterback-rating-by-total-and-components/2013/'>http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/quarterback-rating-by-total-and-components/2013/</a>
that list also has Foles, Bradford and Alex Smith ahead of Luck do I'd take it for a grain of salt. On the field Luck is close if not above average. He's only getting better.
Quote:And the obsession continues...
Agreed.
Your obsession with trolling our board is unhealthy.
The colts are still the best team in our weak division until proven otherwise. But I've never been afraid of them, and we always play them tough.
We will play them even tougher this year.
By the metrics, Luck is mediocre at best. However, when his team is down, he somehow manages to put some plays together to get back in the game. It's a great quality and hides a lot ugly plays.
Quote:Ya. Nick Foles is the best QB in the league and Josh McCown is the 3rd best.
You really love making yourself look foolish, don't you?
Spin it anyway you want. QBR is made off of stats. Nick Foles played very very well last year, as did McCown. Luck didn't even crack top 10. Stop letting your fandom blind you. It's terrible.
Your picking a QB and you have Luck, Foles, and McCown on the board.
Who are you going to pick?
/argument
Quote:Spin it anyway you want. QBR is made off of stats. Nick Foles played very very well last year, as did McCown. Luck didn't even crack top 10. Stop letting your fandom blind you. It's terrible.
I don't think he's letting his fandom blind him.. Anyone with football sense can tell you Luck is far better than Foles, McCown, Smith etc..
.gif "Laughing")