Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Not sure if this has been discussed, but Rams aren't ready to extend Bradford. Any chance they take a QB no. 2 overall?

Nope.

Didnt they give him a contract extension last year? I still think Bradford can be good. Poor guy has had a terrible line to play behind

I will never understand why anybody thinks there is even a chance Sam Bradford's job is in jeopardy after the Rams clearly expressed a commitment to keep him in St. Louis.

Quote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but Rams aren't ready to extend Bradford. Any chance they take a QB no. 2 overall?

Yes, particularly since Bradford is unsettled as a franchise quarterback and had knee reconstruction surgery. 

If I was them, I would. Especially if Clowney goes 1 and you can get Bridgewater. But I hope they don't.

Quote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but Rams aren't ready to extend Bradford. Any chance they take a QB no. 2 overall?

 

I think Les Snead  has been quoted as saying there's absolutely no way they take a quarterback with the 2nd pick in the draft.   

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000...snead-says

Snead will try to trade out again this year. If he can't find a suitor for the pick, I think they'll go with Watkins and then go with an OT with their second pick of the round. They will take a QB, but it will be one to groom, such as Carr, Garappolo, or Mettenberger in a later round.

I have not been impressed with Bradford. Hard to say what is his fault as they have had line issues and a lack of a playmaking WR. Maybe Austin makes a big jump this season, but I think they trade back or take a tackle.

Quote:I think Les Snead  has been quoted as saying there's absolutely no way they take a quarterback with the 2nd pick in the draft.   

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000...snead-says

Never say never, but the fact that the Rams are turning their noses up at QB despite a poor career for Sam Bradford indicates they are not impressed favorably with what they see in prospects.

 

Most pro scouts are attempting to serve up Clemson WR Sammy Watkins to St. Louis.

Quote:Never say never, but the fact that the Rams are turning their noses up at QB despite a poor career for Sam Bradford indicates they are not impressed favorably with what they see in prospects.

 

Most pro scouts are attempting to serve up Clemson WR Sammy Watkins to St. Louis.

 

If Clowney is on the board when St Louis is on the clock, look for a trade with the Falcons.   The Rams will slide down to # 6 and take one of the top offensive tackles or Watkins if he's still available.  

Quote:If Clowney is on the board when St Louis is on the clock, look for a trade with the Falcons.   The Rams will slide down to # 6 and take one of the top offensive tackles or Watkins if he's still available.  

 

I've never been sold on Bradford even when healthy, but I agree with this.

 

This is a terrific draft to get extra picks.  They could even select a QB later without pressuring him to start even if they're secretively looking forward to life after Bradford.

Quote:Snead will try to trade out again this year. If he can't find a suitor for the pick, I think they'll go with Watkins and then go with an OT with their second pick of the round. They will take a QB, but it will be one to groom, such as Carr, Garappolo, or Mettenberger in a later round.

 

No, what they should do is pick Greg Robinson at 2 and Mike Evans at 13.

Quote:Never say never, but the fact that the Rams are turning their noses up at QB despite a poor career for Sam Bradford indicates they are not impressed favorably with what they see in prospects.

 

Most pro scouts are attempting to serve up Clemson WR Sammy Watkins to St. Louis.

 

Actually Sam Bradford has one more year on his contract, so the idea is if they still suck next season, they can pick a quarterback next year. That has nothing to do with the 2014 quarterback crop.