Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Quote:meh, tomato, tomahto.... either way, correct . :yes:

Not even close. But however you'd like to spin it to make you feel good. You're going to do it anyway.

Quote:Not even close. But however you'd like to spin it to make you feel good. You're going to do it anyway.

 

I don't have to spin anything. 

 

Most points. FACT. 

Quote:I don't have to spin anything. 

 

Most points. FACT. 

Most points, but 4-2.  Fact!  Just like the NFL, just because you have the best players doesnt mean you are always going to win.

 

20th in FBT's pick 'em?  Spin away....I've missed picks and I'm not too far behind you.  LOL.

Quote:Most points, but 4-2.  Fact!  Just like the NFL, just because you have the best players doesnt mean you are always going to win.

 

20th in FBT's pick 'em?  Spin away....I've missed picks and I'm not too far behind you.  LOL.

 

I've missed picks too. 

 

oops. 

Quote:I've missed picks too. 

 

oops. 

 

Lets keep it honest...you've missed a pick.  Turning it plural is a little disingenuous.

Quote:Lets keep it honest...you've missed a pick.  Turning it plural is a little disingenuous.

 

I missed one pick this past week, and got screwed over in week one, too. Remember? So, yes, plural. 

Quote:I don't have to spin anything. 

 

Most points. FACT. 

League Leader, 6-0, most points this week, 4th in total points scored. 33 points separates the top 4. All Facts.

 

Edit: Oh, and I beat the brakes off 20-20 in week two.

Quote:I missed one pick this past week, and got screwed over in week one, too. Remember? So, yes, plural. 

so you've missed out on two points. Woah, stop the presses.

Quote:League Leader, 6-0, most points this week, 4th in total points scored. 33 points separates the top 4. All Facts.

 

Edit: Oh, and I beat the brakes off 20-20 in week two.

 

All true. 

 

But more total points over the course of the season is a better representative of the better team. 

 

You're 6-0 and I am not, largely on the basis of you being fortunate as evidenced by your total points against. i.e. Luck. :yes: 

Quote:so you've missed out on two points. Woah, stop the presses.

 

No, I assigned a 16 on the game I got screwed out of. It was an easy game. and I would have assigned no worse than a 6 on last Thursday nights game. 

Quote:No, I assigned a 16 on the game I got screwed out of. It was an easy game. and I would have assigned no worse than a 6 on last Thursday nights game. 

so you still had the 16 for that week. You lost out on two points.

I think Trav just ripped off Snowwolf in a trade again!....

 

 

Dude, seriously?!!......do you beat up little kids for candy on Halloween, too?

Quote:I think Trav just ripped off Snowwolf in a trade again!....

 

 

Dude, seriously?!!......do you beat up little kids for candy on Halloween, too?

No.

Please tell us the trade and we will be the judge.

Quote:Please tell us the trade and we will be the judge.

 

side A gets Fred Jackson,  Chris Johnson and Scott Chandler

 

side B gets Reggie Wayne, Antonio Gates and Denard Robinson

 

 

 

To me, the side getting Wayne and Gates are getting the better of the deal because Fred Jackson will be worthless once Spiller revs it back up to full speed, and Chris Johnson is nothing but a dog anyway. Chandler is waiver wire fodder. 

 

Side B needs TE and WR help since they got crap there right now. 

Doesn't seem like a really unfair trade....

Quote:Doesn't seem like a really unfair trade....

 

I disagree. side B is getting 2 impact players. 

 

Side A is getting 1, and thats only if you consider Chris Johnson an impact player. (i don't he sucks). 

 

Denard Robinson, Fred Jackson, Scott Chandler are all nothing but red herrings in the deal to give the fake appearance of a fair trade i.e. 3 for 3. . 

Quote:Doesn't seem like a really unfair trade....

 

Because it is not.

Quote:I disagree. side B is getting 2 impact players. 

 

Side A is getting 1, and thats only if you consider Chris Johnson an impact player. (i don't he sucks). 

 

Denard Robinson, Fred Jackson, Scott Chandler are all nothing but red herrings in the deal to give the fake appearance of a fair trade i.e. 3 for 3. . 

Side B also has Tony Gonzalez at TE which affords him the luxury of dumping Gates. I knew you couldn't think beyond just names.

 

My original counter was Jackson, Johnson and Chandler for Wayne and Gates. He countered with the inclusion of Robinson instead of flat out dropping him.

Quote:Because it is not.

Side B also has Tony Gonzalez at TE which affords him the luxury of dumping Gates. I knew you couldn't think beyond just names.

 

My original counter was Jackson, Johnson and Chandler for Wayne and Gates. He countered with the inclusion of Robinson instead of flat out dropping him.

 

of course you would say its not. 

 

THats okay, I don't need to rip offf the cellar dwellars of the league to win it. 

 

I'm good enough at spotting talent on the waiver wire and can win while still exhibiting good ethics. 

 

You'd probably beat up an old lady for her umbrella if you got caught in the rain. 

I'm honestly not going against you TMD because its fun to do, but I honestly dont think its an unfair trade.  In fact, if you asked me who got a slight upper hand, it would have been Wolfie.  Lets be honest, CJ Spiller cant stay healthy, and CJ at least has a shot to turn it on.

 

If Side B did have Tony Gonzalez (who already had his bye) then really he was only giving up Wayne.  If you are in a league and need rb help, he just got it.