(07-31-2017, 02:44 PM)MalabarJag Wrote: [ -> ]http://www.nationalreview.com/article/44...bank-fraud
The IT specialist for Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was caught fleeing the country. Who knows what classified info he and his wife (who successfully fled months ago) are giving to "hostile countries." I have heard that the "Newspaper of Record" has totally ignored this.
CNN did give it a minor mention
http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2017/07/27/...tapper.cnn
Where else was it reported?
Interesting, many of the results when searching "Debbie Wasserman Schultz IT administrator" are since-debunked alt-right reports of FBI seizures of computer servers and records from Wasserman Schultz's home. Where is your outrage for this irresponsible reporting?
Maybe more will be reported when more is...you know...known.
Leave it to the left to aske who else reported it. If "their' sources didn't, it must not be true.
(07-31-2017, 09:43 PM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ]Leave it to the left to aske who else reported it. If "their' sources didn't, it must not be true.
Liberalism is a disease like restless leg syndrom.
RJ is the same person that is cool calling a child "it" until "it" is old enough to determine its own gender. I am shocked he is questioning the validity of all this evidence. He probably thinks HRC is a nice woman too.
The claim was this was not reported by the MSM, my question is if all news outlets are discredited as MSM, then where was this reported and received as credible?
From the OP:
Quote:The IT specialist for Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was caught fleeing the country. Who knows what classified info he and his wife (who successfully fled months ago) are giving to "hostile countries."
Reporting on a "who knows?" is not reporting.
(08-03-2017, 08:04 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]RJ is the same person that is cool calling a child "it" until "it" is old enough to determine its own gender. I am shocked he is questioning the validity of all this evidence. He probably thinks HRC is a nice woman too.
And you're the same person who creates threads based on something you "heard" without having even read an actual report beyond what you "heard".
But it's the MSM's fault, right?