Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: What's the Deal? (QB complaints)
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4
(09-17-2017, 10:39 PM)BklynJag Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-17-2017, 10:34 PM)Jagzfanfromiowa Wrote: [ -> ]Just look at the Packers tonight.  They are playing like sh** and Rodgers can't overcome that.  They're getting blown out.  Maybe they should move on from him huh?

You act like this was Bortles first bad game lol. Don't compare the 2 please.

Yeah, that's some MAJOR false equivalency there.
(09-17-2017, 09:18 PM)BklynJag Wrote: [ -> ]AJ Macarron is an option as well. This team is afraid to make a bold move. They rather just suck.

It is completely idiotic to think any team I'd going to trade their backup QB away in week 2, especially when their starter is struggling.  You do grasp just how stupid that suggestion is, right?

McCarron is no more of an option for this team than Tom Brady is.
(09-17-2017, 10:33 PM)Tuxedo Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-17-2017, 10:32 PM)Teal Time Radio Wrote: [ -> ]Unless ya can convince Romo to come here and leave broadcasting.  Not a real option out there at QB. Khan the owner said no to Kaep.  

So get over it Colin will never be a Jag.

Khan said he'd be willing to sign him if recommended by the football minds, Coughlin said no.

The football minds made it clear there's no interest.  Khan was simply deflecting any possible criticism from the likes of Spike Lee and other celebrities who were calling out owners for not signing the guy.
(09-17-2017, 11:08 PM)FBT Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-17-2017, 09:18 PM)BklynJag Wrote: [ -> ]AJ Macarron is an option as well. This team is afraid to make a bold move. They rather just suck.

It is completely idiotic to think any team I'd going to trade their backup QB away in week 2, especially when their starter is struggling.  You do grasp just how stupid that suggestion is, right?

McCarron is no more of an option for this team than Tom Brady is.


People think there are GM's just waiting on us to call to make any deal we would want.

They've played too much Madden and think that if you just keep making offers, the team with eventually cave.  I can see them in front of their TV going, "Hey, if you trade the next 8 years 6th round picks, you can trade for Cousins" or other nonsense.
(09-17-2017, 11:20 PM)nate Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-17-2017, 11:08 PM)FBT Wrote: [ -> ]It is completely idiotic to think any team I'd going to trade their backup QB away in week 2, especially when their starter is struggling.  You do grasp just how stupid that suggestion is, right?

McCarron is no more of an option for this team than Tom Brady is.


People think there are GM's just waiting on us to call to make any deal we would want.

They've played too much Madden and think that if you just keep making offers, the team with eventually cave.  I can see them in front of their TV going, "Hey, if you trade the next 8 years 6th round picks, you can trade for Cousins" or other nonsense.

Consider who is suggesting this.
(09-17-2017, 11:20 PM)nate Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-17-2017, 11:08 PM)FBT Wrote: [ -> ]It is completely idiotic to think any team I'd going to trade their backup QB away in week 2, especially when their starter is struggling.  You do grasp just how stupid that suggestion is, right?

McCarron is no more of an option for this team than Tom Brady is.


People think there are GM's just waiting on us to call to make any deal we would want.

They've played too much Madden and think that if you just keep making offers, the team with eventually cave.  I can see them in front of their TV going, "Hey, if you trade the next 8 years 6th round picks, you can trade for Cousins" or other nonsense.

Well, he was suggesting giving two first round picks to New England for Jimmy G, so he'd give WAY more than sixth round picks for McCarron.
(09-17-2017, 08:21 PM)jseymour Wrote: [ -> ]Best to wait until next year and get a real upgrade to a QB. Keeping Bortles will assure a high pick.

Even next year Blake Bortles will still be our starter because he will be playing on the fifth year option.

Keeping Borthes does not assure us anything in either free agency or the draft. The future is unknown for him and the team.
(09-17-2017, 10:55 PM)wrong_box Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-17-2017, 08:01 PM)BklynJag Wrote: [ -> ]Why is this team so reluctant to bring in another QB? I mean, it really is pathetic that they feel they have to stay with Blake. Do something, make a trade, sign Kaep whatever. This team is an AVERAGE QB away from winning this division. 

I don't wanna hear, ohhh who can they bring in.......there are options out there that are better than Blake. 

So why is this organization set on our QB situation?

(09-17-2017, 09:08 PM)BklynJag Wrote: [ -> ]Vikings lose there QB last season, what do they do, make a huge trade for another one. This team needs to make a bold move.

and then have jack [BLEEP] for picks next year...We need OL really bad and if we trade away pics for a one year stop gap we can't get quality OL...I know Kaep wouldn't cost any picks, but, Coughlin already said they did their study of Kaep and they are not interested...

IDK why it's so hard to understand why Kaep is unemployed...Not one of 32 teams are interested in him, not even as a back up and yet fans still call for him...They did the same thing with Tebow who is a baseball player now because 32 teams didn't think he was good enough to be a NFL QB even though fans still call for him...

Tebow is a bad example? How many chances did the NFL give Tebow before he stepped away? Also, he was picked up by the Patriots and if you can't be a back up in that offense
then you really need to have a seat.
(09-18-2017, 12:29 AM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-17-2017, 08:21 PM)jseymour Wrote: [ -> ]Best to wait until next year and get a real upgrade to a QB. Keeping Bortles will assure a high pick.

Even next year Blake Bortles will still be our starter because he will be playing on the fifth year option.

Keeping Borthes does not assure us anything in either free agency or the draft. The future is unknown for him and the team.

Bortles won't be on the roster beyond the start of the new league year.  You can book that now. They'll release him the first chance they get.  He's not going to have any trade value. They're not going to pay him $19 million.  Barring some miraculous turn around, he's done as a Jaguar in 14 games.
(09-18-2017, 12:29 AM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-17-2017, 08:21 PM)jseymour Wrote: [ -> ]Best to wait until next year and get a real upgrade to a QB. Keeping Bortles will assure a high pick.

Even next year Blake Bortles will still be our starter because he will be playing on the fifth year option.

Keeping Borthes does not assure us anything in either free agency or the draft. The future is unknown for him and the team.
Blake can be cut after the season saving the 19 mil...unless he is injured.
(09-18-2017, 12:33 AM)FBT Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-18-2017, 12:29 AM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]Even next year Blake Bortles will still be our starter because he will be playing on the fifth year option.

Keeping Borthes does not assure us anything in either free agency or the draft. The future is unknown for him and the team.

Bortles won't be on the roster beyond the start of the new league year.  You can book that now. They'll release him the first chance they get.  He's not going to have any trade value. They're not going to pay him $19 million.  Barring some miraculous turn around, he's done as a Jaguar in 14 games.
Precisely
(09-18-2017, 12:29 AM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-17-2017, 08:21 PM)jseymour Wrote: [ -> ]Best to wait until next year and get a real upgrade to a QB. Keeping Bortles will assure a high pick.

Even next year Blake Bortles will still be our starter because he will be playing on the fifth year option.

Keeping Borthes does not assure us anything in either free agency or the draft. The future is unknown for him and the team.

LOL. Bortles is done after this season.
(09-17-2017, 08:01 PM)BklynJag Wrote: [ -> ]Why is this team so reluctant to bring in another QB? I mean, it really is pathetic that they feel they have to stay with Blake. Do something, make a trade, sign Kaep whatever. This team is an AVERAGE QB away from winning this division. 

I don't wanna hear, ohhh who can they bring in.......there are options out there that are better than Blake. 

So why is this organization set on our QB situation?


The Rams have a very intriguing young QB on their roster. His name is Brandon Allen. I know we already spent a draft pick on him, but maybe it's worth spending another to get him back.


I'm just kidding, but we never should have let him go.
(09-17-2017, 11:08 PM)FBT Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-17-2017, 09:18 PM)BklynJag Wrote: [ -> ]AJ Macarron is an option as well. This team is afraid to make a bold move. They rather just suck.

It is completely idiotic to think any team I'd going to trade their backup QB away in week 2, especially when their starter is struggling.  You do grasp just how stupid that suggestion is, right?

McCarron is no more of an option for this team than Tom Brady is.

If the price is right they would. 

So you'd rather stick with status quo and watch this disaster at QB for the rest of the season. Breaking News, he wont turn it around.
(09-17-2017, 08:14 PM)Flagler Jagsfan Wrote: [ -> ]Ok, so I really despise Kaepernick personally.  But I think at this point I really despise more the pathetic state of perpetual losing by this football team. I am "almost" to a point of being ok with Kaepernick coming here to JAX. This team is going nowhere with either QB on its roster.  Maybe  Kaepernick provides an alternative until we draft/sign someone else next year.

#becauseBortles

Let's see... U got me pondering upon who it is that I may despise. Personally, and all, I mean... Hmph! Can't think of anyone. I mean, trump comes to mind but I don't DESPISE the guy. What's with all this aimless hate in this world we live?
(09-18-2017, 08:09 AM)BklynJag Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-17-2017, 11:08 PM)FBT Wrote: [ -> ]It is completely idiotic to think any team I'd going to trade their backup QB away in week 2, especially when their starter is struggling.  You do grasp just how stupid that suggestion is, right?

McCarron is no more of an option for this team than Tom Brady is.

If the price is right they would. 

So you'd rather stick with status quo and watch this disaster at QB for the rest of the season. Breaking News, he wont turn it around.
It's Bortles this year. So you can stop complaining about the lack of trades.

Next year is a whole new ball game. Expect Rudolph, Jackson, Darnold, Rosen or Allen to be in Teal come May 2018. I also wouldn't be shocked if there is a veteran signed as well. 

But as far as this year? Please don't make a new thread after every game about how bad Blake is. We all know he's bad and no one here has said otherwise.
RG3 is available for nothing.
(09-18-2017, 08:44 AM)jg77 Wrote: [ -> ]RG3 is available for nothing.
Well that's because he's worth nothing. He sucks.

He's currently playing pickup basketball against 40 year old bald dudes.
My guess is they go hard after one of these free agent qb's over the summer. Garoppolo or Cousins would be interesting here.
(09-18-2017, 06:21 AM)Jags02 Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-17-2017, 08:01 PM)BklynJag Wrote: [ -> ]Why is this team so reluctant to bring in another QB? I mean, it really is pathetic that they feel they have to stay with Blake. Do something, make a trade, sign Kaep whatever. This team is an AVERAGE QB away from winning this division. 

I don't wanna hear, ohhh who can they bring in.......there are options out there that are better than Blake. 

So why is this organization set on our QB situation?


The Rams have a very intriguing young QB on their roster. His name is Brandon Allen. I know we already spent a draft pick on him, but maybe it's worth spending another to get him back.


I'm just kidding, but we never should have let him go.

Allen will never EARN a starting gig in the NFL.  He's destined for career backup status.  Letting him go didn't hurt this roster one bit.
Pages: 1 2 3 4