Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

(10-20-2017, 07:17 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-20-2017, 06:59 PM)DragonFury Wrote: [ -> ]People see what they want to see and clearly you want to see a man.

People don't see what they wanna see. They see how someone was created. No amount of surgeries can change that. Someone can say they identify as a cat and have all kinds of surgeries to make themselves look how they feel, but no matter what they do, they'll never be a cat. It's the same idea with this model.

Should we legally call this guy a tiger, because he identifies as one?

I'm pretty sure Ines Rau doesn't give a rat''s [BLEEP] what you think of her, but she may well agree with you. It still doesn't change her life, who she loves or who loves her.

(10-20-2017, 07:27 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-20-2017, 07:17 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]People don't see what they wanna see. They see how someone was created. No amount of surgeries can change that. Someone can say they identify as a cat and have all kinds of surgeries to make themselves look how they feel, but no matter what they do, they'll never be a cat. It's the same idea with this model.

Should we legally call this guy a tiger, because he identifies as one?

I saw Winger with this....

Don't knock it till you try it..

Even if you think this is a woman, he instantly became the ugliest Playboy cover model.

(10-20-2017, 07:17 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-20-2017, 06:59 PM)DragonFury Wrote: [ -> ]People see what they want to see and clearly you want to see a man.

People don't see what they wanna see. They see how someone was created. No amount of surgeries can change that. Someone can say they identify as a cat and have all kinds of surgeries to make themselves look how they feel, but no matter what they do, they'll never be a cat. It's the same idea with this model.

Should we legally call this guy a tiger, because he identifies as one?

I'm saying that maybe you prefer your nudie mags be full of men. Aint nothing wrong with that.

(10-21-2017, 05:55 AM)DragonFury Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-20-2017, 07:17 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]People don't see what they wanna see. They see how someone was created. No amount of surgeries can change that. Someone can say they identify as a cat and have all kinds of surgeries to make themselves look how they feel, but no matter what they do, they'll never be a cat. It's the same idea with this model.

Should we legally call this guy a tiger, because he identifies as one?

I'm saying that maybe you prefer your nudie mags be full of men. Aint nothing wrong with that.

No. Try as you may to bait me, your theory makes no sense. Why would I rail against a dude being in this magazine, if I wanted dudes in the magazine? Maybe you're deflecting your own desires onto me. That seems more logical. Maybe you're just too embarrassed to say you're curious about the photos? That's your deal though. You need to work that out yourself. Playboy was built on the solid foundation of showing naked women. Hefner isn't even cold in the ground and now they put a dude in the pages? This country is going downhill quickly. In an effort to become so p.c. and make sure everyone is included, we are ruining landmark institutions. No heterosexual man is gonna wanna look at a model that was born a man. If he does, he is at the very least, bisexual. Maybe they can start their own publication, but Playboy belonged to the heterosexuals. At least it was. I'll be willing to bet they lose subscriptions over this.

(10-21-2017, 05:55 AM)DragonFury Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-20-2017, 07:17 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]People don't see what they wanna see. They see how someone was created. No amount of surgeries can change that. Someone can say they identify as a cat and have all kinds of surgeries to make themselves look how they feel, but no matter what they do, they'll never be a cat. It's the same idea with this model.

Should we legally call this guy a tiger, because he identifies as one?

I'm saying that maybe you prefer your nudie mags be full of men. Aint nothing wrong with that.

Men look at these magazines to fantasize. Would you sleep with a Korean man who transformed himself to look like one of your K-pop cuties?

(10-21-2017, 07:38 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-21-2017, 05:55 AM)DragonFury Wrote: [ -> ]I'm saying that maybe you prefer your nudie mags be full of men. Aint nothing wrong with that.

Men look at these magazines to fantasize. Would you sleep with a Korean man who transformed himself to look like one of your K-pop cuties?

I thought that was a requirement to BE a Kpop cutie? 

(10-20-2017, 10:50 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ]Even if you think this is a woman, he instantly became the ugliest Playboy cover model, IMO.

FTFY

(10-21-2017, 07:38 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-21-2017, 05:55 AM)DragonFury Wrote: [ -> ]I'm saying that maybe you prefer your nudie mags be full of men. Aint nothing wrong with that.

Men look at these magazines to fantasize. Would you sleep with a Korean man who transformed himself to look like one of your K-pop cuties?

It will be interesting to see how this issue affects subscriptions and over the counter sales. Not all men fantasize about the same thing.

(10-21-2017, 08:40 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-21-2017, 07:38 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]Men look at these magazines to fantasize. Would you sleep with a Korean man who transformed himself to look like one of your K-pop cuties?

It will be interesting to see how this issue affects subscriptions and over the counter sales. Not all men fantasize about the same thing.

If they are regular subscribers, it’s a safe guess that they do.

(10-21-2017, 08:51 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-21-2017, 08:40 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]It will be interesting to see how this issue affects subscriptions and over the counter sales. Not all men fantasize about the same thing.

If they are regular subscribers, it’s a safe guess that they do.

I'm not so sure, you'd be surprised what's become mainstream porn these days. Or maybe you wouldn't, I don't know you. Anyway, there's a good chance Playboy subscribers don't limit their interests to what one magazine presents. Free thought and pushing boundaries was what Hugh Hefner was about, after all.

The bottom line is Ines Rau will sell magazines, and maybe open a few eyes, as uncomfortable as that may be for some.