Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Jags Among Teams Kicking Tires on Jarvis Landry
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
(10-31-2017, 03:36 PM)Rico Wrote: [ -> ]Wide receivers do not have tires.

Actually they do. WRs have cars and trucks, which have tires.

(10-31-2017, 04:24 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]FWIW   --  Miami's FO told a local reporter that Landry was never on the block.

Strictly rumor.

One more example of why I don't like Twitter as a news source unless it is a legit reporter's verified account.
(10-31-2017, 04:36 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-31-2017, 03:36 PM)Rico Wrote: [ -> ]Wide receivers do not have tires.

Actually they do. WRs have cars and trucks, which have tires.
Am I the only one thinking “6 months ago, JDub would have been saying what Rico said, and any other poster would have said what JDub said”

It’s like is lose-lose.
(10-31-2017, 05:59 PM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-31-2017, 04:36 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]Actually they do. WRs have cars and trucks, which have tires.
Am I the only one thinking “6 months ago, JDub would have been saying what Rico said, and any other poster would have said what JDub said”

It’s like is lose-lose.

Seriously. When I read Rico's post I had to do a triple take at the name because I thought it was JDub.
(10-31-2017, 04:36 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-31-2017, 03:36 PM)Rico Wrote: [ -> ]Wide receivers do not have tires.

Actually they do. WRs have cars and trucks, which have tires.
This is why people hate you.

(11-01-2017, 11:22 AM)Tyler1Reformed Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-31-2017, 05:59 PM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ]Am I the only one thinking “6 months ago, JDub would have been saying what Rico said, and any other poster would have said what JDub said”

It’s like is lose-lose.

Seriously. When I read Rico's post I had to do a triple take at the name because I thought it was JDub.

I think Rico was purposefully being JDub-ish
Meeeee??
I knew what Rico was doing. I guess I worded it wrong. Just meant to say it was a lose-lose situation. I could’ve seen the exchange happen with the replies reversed. Meaning no winning with the favored one.
Posting for the sake of posting is a jdub tradition.
Fully a quarter to a third of every thread is her nonsense and post building.
(11-02-2017, 11:52 PM)Mowerguy Wrote: [ -> ]Posting for the sake of posting is a jdub tradition.
Fully a quarter to a third of every thread is her nonsense and post Negative Rating building.

There we go...
Pages: 1 2 3