11-01-2016, 09:36 PM
Pages: 1 2
11-01-2016, 11:45 PM
My bold prediction this Sunday is that my coffee will be bold. That's about it man. I am going fishing instead. Not going to let this team keep ruining my year.
11-02-2016, 02:27 AM
Bortles bench, henne leads the jags to victory
11-02-2016, 08:53 AM
Bold prediction: Gus Bradley is fired at halftime and replaced by Tom Coughlin who is helicopteted in at halftime.
11-02-2016, 09:46 AM
Quote:The real problem is the Jaguars D can't hold the opponent UNDER their scoring average.
We've been outscored 57 to 6 in the 1st half of the past 3 games.
Yes, we've scored 6 first half points in total over the past 3 games; that's an average of 2 points per game in the 1st half.
11-02-2016, 10:18 AM
^^ Eewww.
Man, that is UGLY.
Man, that is UGLY.
11-02-2016, 10:42 AM
45-23 Jags
But after I woke up it was 38- 17 Chiefs.
But after I woke up it was 38- 17 Chiefs.
11-02-2016, 11:35 AM
Quote:We've been outscored 57 to 6 in the 1st half of the past 3 games.Defense is going to get tired when they are CONSTANTLY on the field in the beginning of games.
Yes, we've scored 6 first half points in total over the past 3 games; that's an average of 2 points per game in the 1st half.
11-02-2016, 12:13 PM
Quote:Defense is going to get tired when they are CONSTANTLY on the field in the beginning of games.
I was actually surprised the defense held up so well in Chicago. The Jags offense couldn't stay on the field for most of the 1st half and into the 3rd qtr.
The announcers kept going on and on about it, paraphrasing "At some point the Jags offense are going to have to do something to help this defense out. They've been on the field way too much."
I'm surprised they didn't cave.
11-02-2016, 12:57 PM
Well now we get Foles..... Let the excuses fly for why we don't win this win.
No Smith, Charles, Ware, Houston....
No Smith, Charles, Ware, Houston....
Guest
11-02-2016, 01:11 PM
Quote:Well now we get Foles..... Let the excuses fly for why we don't win this win.
No Smith, Charles, Ware, Houston....
To be fair, they have a good stable of backs and there isn't much film on foles yet
11-02-2016, 01:52 PM
Foles is gonna light us up.
11-02-2016, 02:02 PM
Quote:To be fair, they have a good stable of backs and there isn't much film on foles yetTo be fair though, Foles sucks.
11-02-2016, 02:27 PM
Quote:To be fair, they have a good stable of backs and there isn't much film on foles yetplenty of film on Foles
Their stable of running backs are Charcandrick West and Bishop Sankey (formerly of the tacks and just picked up from Pats PS) because Ware and Charles are dinged up
Pages: 1 2