12-07-2017, 04:03 PM
Ramsey has yet to practice this week and a new CB signed on the 4th. Hmm 
12-07-2017, 04:04 PM
(12-07-2017, 04:03 PM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]Ramsey has yet to practice this week and a new CB signed on the 4th. Hmm
OMG...was that on aol?
12-07-2017, 04:14 PM
(12-07-2017, 04:03 PM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]Ramsey has yet to practice this week and a new CB signed on the 4th. Hmm.
If that was true NFL.com would have reported it by now.
12-07-2017, 04:22 PM
(12-07-2017, 04:14 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ](12-07-2017, 04:03 PM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]Ramsey has yet to practice this week and a new CB signed on the 4th. Hmm.
If that was true NFL.com would have reported it by now.
His family didn't want it reported but he has passed on. A corn on his foot ruptured and became infected.
I'm currently in mourning.
12-07-2017, 04:25 PM
(12-07-2017, 04:22 PM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ](12-07-2017, 04:14 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]If that was true NFL.com would have reported it by now.
His family didn't want it reported but he has passed on. A corn on his foot ruptured and became infected.
I'm currently in mourning.
Thoughts and prayers
12-07-2017, 04:30 PM
(12-07-2017, 04:04 PM)unf_nashvillian Wrote: [ -> ](12-07-2017, 04:03 PM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]Ramsey has yet to practice this week and a new CB signed on the 4th. Hmm
OMG...was that on aol?
www.jagwads.con
(12-07-2017, 04:14 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]Or it could be in an injury report somewhere...(12-07-2017, 04:03 PM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]Ramsey has yet to practice this week and a new CB signed on the 4th. Hmm.
If that was true NFL.com would have reported it by now.
12-07-2017, 04:32 PM
(12-07-2017, 04:30 PM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ](12-07-2017, 04:04 PM)unf_nashvillian Wrote: [ -> ]OMG...was that on aol?
www.jagwads.con
(12-07-2017, 04:14 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]If that was true NFL.com would have reported it by now.Or it could be in an injury report somewhere...
Those don't exist, sir, and Google certainly can't answer any of these questions.
If the Jaguars play to their strengths, they should win this game.
EDIT: Trying to stay on topic, I swear!
12-07-2017, 04:35 PM
(12-07-2017, 04:32 PM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ]Well, crap.(12-07-2017, 04:30 PM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]www.jagwads.con
Or it could be in an injury report somewhere...
Those don't exist, sir, and Google certainly can't answer any of these questions.
If the Jaguars play to their strengths, they should win this game.
EDIT: Trying to stay on topic, I swear!
12-07-2017, 04:58 PM
(12-07-2017, 04:32 PM)TrivialPursuil Wrote: [ -> ]If the Jaguars play to their strengths, they should win this game.That would mean keeping Seattle's offense off the field, right? Even without a healthy LOB, they can beat us with their run defense and pass rush.
12-07-2017, 04:59 PM
(12-07-2017, 04:58 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ](12-07-2017, 04:32 PM)TrivialPursuil Wrote: [ -> ]If the Jaguars play to their strengths, they should win this game.That would mean keeping Seattle's offense off the field, right? Even without a healthy LOB, they can beat us with their run defense and pass rush.
Seattle's offense has to get on the field. It's in the rules.
12-07-2017, 05:36 PM
(12-07-2017, 04:59 PM)Rico Wrote: [ -> ]But couldn't the Jags technically keep Seattle's offense off the field for the entire game via an unprecedented success rate with onside kicks? I mean it's highly unlikely to happen, but it is possible. Not a bad game strategy tbh. Keep that pesky Russell Wilson off the field.(12-07-2017, 04:58 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]That would mean keeping Seattle's offense off the field, right? Even without a healthy LOB, they can beat us with their run defense and pass rush.
Seattle's offense has to get on the field. It's in the rules.
12-07-2017, 05:38 PM
(12-07-2017, 04:59 PM)Rico Wrote: [ -> ](12-07-2017, 04:58 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]That would mean keeping Seattle's offense off the field, right? Even without a healthy LOB, they can beat us with their run defense and pass rush.
Seattle's offense has to get on the field. It's in the rules.
We can dominate TOP and make them score with Blakr Walsh's right leg.
12-07-2017, 05:42 PM
12-07-2017, 05:48 PM
(12-07-2017, 05:42 PM)Brett Wrote: [ -> ](12-07-2017, 05:38 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]We can dominate TOP and make them score with Blakr Walsh's right leg.
It's called "Time of Possession" not TOP. And his name is "Blair" not "Blakr".
I'm glad you cleared that up. This talk of domination, I wasn't sure what was going on.
12-07-2017, 05:52 PM
(12-07-2017, 05:48 PM)unf_nashvillian Wrote: [ -> ](12-07-2017, 05:42 PM)Brett Wrote: [ -> ]It's called "Time of Possession" not TOP. And his name is "Blair" not "Blakr".
I'm glad you cleared that up. This talk of domination, I wasn't sure what was going on.
I got your back bro.
She wants to come at me for saying my stat of the Seahawks leading the league in penalties not meaning anything? Well then I'll come back at her like a spider monkey.
12-07-2017, 06:01 PM
(12-07-2017, 05:52 PM)Brett Wrote: [ -> ](12-07-2017, 05:48 PM)unf_nashvillian Wrote: [ -> ]I'm glad you cleared that up. This talk of domination, I wasn't sure what was going on.
I got your back bro.
She wants to come at me for saying my stat of the Seahawks leading the league in penalties not meaning anything? Well then I'll come back at her like a spider monkey.
I was not trying to "come at" you. I was just stating a fact when I said only accepted penalties are counted in the "most penalized team" statistic. If you count all of the penalties, including offseat and declined fouls, are the Seahawks still #1 in the "most penalized teams" category? Houw would you know?
12-07-2017, 06:15 PM
(12-04-2017, 07:21 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ](12-04-2017, 01:58 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]Titans still have @Arizona and the Rams. That's 2 very tough games.
If the Jags win this week and Titans lose, there is a good chance the last game of the season means nothing.
There is zero chnace the last game will mean notthing. Even if the division title is decided by then, AFC playoff seeding is still TBD. There are many possible scenarios, depending on what happens elsewhere in the AFC.
(12-07-2017, 06:01 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ](12-07-2017, 05:52 PM)Brett Wrote: [ -> ]I got your back bro.
She wants to come at me for saying my stat of the Seahawks leading the league in penalties not meaning anything? Well then I'll come back at her like a spider monkey.
I was not trying to "come at" you. I was just stating a fact when I said only accepted penalties are counted in the "most penalized team" statistic. If you count all of the penalties, including offseat and declined fouls, are the Seahawks still #1 in the "most penalized teams" category? Houw would you know?
What's an offseat penalty? Is that when a backup comes off the bench too soon so they penalize him for being presumptuous?
The NFL is getting out of control with these penalties and flags these days. Penalizing someone for getting off the bench too soon? Get out of here with that nonsense. And don't they know flags belong on poles? Not on the football field. I hope the Seahawks get a few red cards this weekend, just not for offseat penalties though.
12-08-2017, 05:48 AM
I'm thinking the seahawks run away with this one. Have the jags been blown out yet? Other than the Titans game?
12-08-2017, 07:42 AM
I feel the teal this week. This would have been an interesting game if we were anything close to healthy. The Seahawks aren't healthy either but they have the ingredients for winning.
12-08-2017, 08:31 AM
(12-08-2017, 05:48 AM)Jeff.Fisher Wrote: [ -> ]I'm thinking the seahawks run away with this one. Have the jags been blown out yet? Other than the Titans game?
You mean the game from 2-3 months ago? No, we haven't, but you still have a few more weeks to cling on to that week 2 victory as if it were your sister or something you dirty dirty tack fan.