10-28-2016, 03:47 PM
Quote:spacecoast, you think Bortles is playing well this year. Please don't say others are oblivious.
Never once did I say Bortles is playing WELL this year. Never once in ANY post.
Another lie.
Quote:spacecoast, you think Bortles is playing well this year. Please don't say others are oblivious.
Quote:Never once did I say Bortles is playing WELL this year. Never once in ANY post.
Another lie.
Quote:[BAD WORD REMOVED]? Dude that's you literally saying "I never typed the words "Bortles is playing well this year""" even though you spout off nonstop stats about his stats this year vs Cam Newton and garbage time vs Phillip Rivers.
I said this earlier in another thread but this time it's directed at you, I literally think you type so much [BAD WORD REMOVED] and you know it, that you don't know what to keep track of anymore.
It's like a habitual liar. They lie so much that at some point they just have no idea what they're talking about. You fit this 100%.
Quote:You can't follow anything can you? All I've been saying is Bortles is NOT the problem on this team. At all. I said nothing about his play this year. He's doing great for a 23-24 year old QB according to the history of the NFL standards.
Peyton Manning threw 100 INTs his first 5 years.
Jags fans are just inept and used to 15 TD, 2200 yard QBs for 18 years. They don't really have a clue. It's understandable.
Quote:He's one of those delusional people that lie over and over, talk in circles, and when you say that they say something they will tell you they never said it. He's the new TMD of the Jaguar message board. No rational discussion will ever come from him. You will never be able to get him to see a valid point you make, he will never understand anything.
He likes to get a rise out of people and telling Jaguar fans that the team is going to move is the ultimate rise.
Quote:I know about Peyton Manning throwing 100 ints in his first 5 years. You want to know how I know about that? You've typed it 100 times in the past 5 days on this forum, that's how. I literally get stats glued to my brain because you type nonsensical [BAD WORD REMOVED] over and over so much that people like me literally lose brain cells having that knowledge stuck to their brains for no reason.
You keep quoting Leftwich / Garrard years but of course leave out the fact that we had no receivers during those years, the team was bad during those years, it wasn't a passing league during those years, or a million other facts. Dude you're a [BAD WORD REMOVED] complete joke and you'll probably be banned for life before too much longer as much of a circus as you're causing around here.
Quote:If you look at past relocations there's almost an established playbook for how to move a team. It starts with an old stadium with low revenue streams. Then the owner starts demanding small concessions from the local government in terms of revenue, it might be that they get to keep the revenue from luxury boxes or that the city pays for all maintenance. Then he demands get bigger and bigger with ever increasing renovations and expenses. Then they start demanding a new stadium. When the city says no at one point during this whole process the owner then threatens to move the team and if he keeps getting no he does it. Bonus points if they pull Kroenke where they complain about the stadium but make zero effort to work with the city on improving or replacing it.
None of this has happened in Jacksonville. There have been stadium improvements for sure but Khan has paid for them equally with the city and the city pays for them with money already allocated to the stadium. Khan is working with the city to improve the stadium and has never used the threat of relocation to make demands.
Quote:Yeah, you've only talked up on numerous posts and hijacked others.
You don't put hundreds of millions into a stadium only to move it 4 years later. It's a bad investment. You don't know a thing about money. Now please lie to me and tell me about all the people you know, and how connected you are while still talking on the Jaguars message board....
Quote:Voice of reason, is that you? Thank you for rightfully pointing out the obvious. Zero - and I mean zero - empirical evidence exists that points to Shad Khan's desire to move the Jaguars to London. Even if we pretend like the Jaguars don't have an ironclad lease through 2030 (which they do), the conspiracy theories simply don't even make logical sense.Here's the thing about the lease; The Jaguars can break the lease if they can show three consecutive years of operating losses. This will never happen because the NFL will never allow a franchise to open its books to a judicial court. but most damning to this fact is that the London games make the Jaguars profitable. The revenue from the London games is so large it is actually helping to keep the Jaguars in Jacksonville.
Quote:Here's the thing about the lease; The Jaguars can break the lease if they can show three consecutive years of operating losses. This will never happen because the NFL will never allow a franchise to open its books to a judicial court. but most damning to this fact is that the London games make the Jaguars profitable. The revenue from the London games is so large it is actually helping to keep the Jaguars in Jacksonville.
Also quick note; Everbank bought the naming rights in 2010, Khan didn't buy the team until 2011. So Khan didn't sell the naming rights though he did extend them.