Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

(12-07-2017, 12:48 AM)Teal Curtain Wrote: [ -> ]FOX broadcasters IMO are worse to listen to than any CBS crew.
Listening to Chris Myers is going to be brutal on Sunday.


Is there a website where I can see the rankings of each companies crew? Obviously CBS A-Team is Nance, and FOX is Joe Buck. I would find it interesting where everyone else ranks.

Other than FOX A Team, I find their crews annoying as well.  CBS Teams have some annoying people but nowhere near what you get with Fox.  I have enjoyed listening to Lofton do color.  He is bringing it.

I don't like FOX because my antenna doesn't really pick them up well. That's why I'm happy I'm actually going to the game this week. Early Christmas present from the wife!

Don't worry you'll be complaining about BB5 or Lee in no time! #straightfacts

(12-07-2017, 12:48 AM)Teal Curtain Wrote: [ -> ]FOX broadcasters IMO are worse to listen to than any CBS crew.
Listening to Chris Myers is going to be brutal on Sunday.

Is there a website where I can see the rankings of each companies crew? Obviously CBS A-Team is Nantz, and FOX is Joe Buck. I would find it interesting where everyone else ranks.

Kevin Burkhart is Fox's #2. Jay Cutler was going to work with him if the Dolphins had not called.

One thing I noticed over and over was Spero Dedes was rooting for the Cardinals. He got super-excited when they scored, not so much after our TDs.

Hate living in South Texas, only gotten 2 games this season. Looks like i have to wait for the tinhorns game to see them live again.

(12-07-2017, 03:13 AM)D6 Wrote: [ -> ]Seeing the maps makes one likely reason for the move of the Jaguars game to 4:25PM evident. This way, there won't be a conflict with the Bucs on FOX in the Orlando and Gainesville markets.

If that was the case it would not be flexed, but originally scheduled for 4:25.

(12-06-2017, 08:12 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]Face it.  The Seahawks @ Jaguars coverage would pretty much look the same whether it was a 1:00 game or a 4:25 game.

That's what I'm thinking too.
I just can't understand it for the life of me.

DangeRuss is a legit MVP candidate. The Hawks coming to town VS the up and coming Jags.

Sure Eagles/Rams are two top tier NFC teams... but the entire country getting that coverage is whack.
Florida affiliates should at least rep the Florida team

(12-06-2017, 06:43 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-06-2017, 06:31 PM)JagsFanSince95 Wrote: [ -> ]What a joke. I expected this though, another jab at the Jags. Huge favor for the Seahawks too with the late start.

NFL.com lets everyone know which games will be flexed when the decisions are made, so I knew about it. The bigger joke is Nasvhille losing coverage of our game.

Pssst....the Titans kickoff just a half hour before the Jags.  No one in Nashville (except Brett) wants to watch the Jags instead of the Titans.

(12-07-2017, 01:54 PM)unf_nashvillian Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-06-2017, 06:43 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]NFL.com lets everyone know which games will be flexed when the decisions are made, so I knew about it. The bigger joke is Nasvhille losing coverage of our game.

Pssst....the Titans kickoff just a half hour before the Jags.  No one in Nashville (except Brett) wants to watch the Jags instead of the Titans.

Lol very true my friend, very true. Guess I will stick to my NFL Redzone for updates

(12-06-2017, 08:12 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]Face it.  The Seahawks @ Jaguars coverage would pretty much look the same whether it was a 1:00 game or a 4:25 game.

Now if the game was being broadcast on CBS the coverage map might look a bit different.

Here are the 1:00 coverage maps:

CBS (Vikings/Panthers in both markets)



FOX (Cowboys/Giants in Seattle, Lions/Buccaneers in Jacksonville)



Note: FOX is the doubleheader network this week. Where CBS shows late games, there is no early game.

(12-07-2017, 01:24 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-07-2017, 03:13 AM)D6 Wrote: [ -> ]Seeing the maps makes one likely reason for the move of the Jaguars game to 4:25PM evident. This way, there won't be a conflict with the Bucs on FOX in the Orlando and Gainesville markets.

If that was the case it would not be flexed, but originally scheduled for 4:25.

The Jaguars exceeded expectations this season.   I think the demand to see their game in their Secondary Markets is noticeably higher now than anticipated when the NFL Schedule was put together.

(12-07-2017, 04:16 PM)D6 Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-07-2017, 01:24 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]If that was the case it would not be flexed, but originally scheduled for 4:25.

The Jaguars exceeded expectations this season. I think the demand to see their game in their secondary markets is noticeably higher now than anticipated when the NFL Schedule was put together.

Every year the secondary market blocks me out of one game. It was the Rams game this year despite the 4:25 kickoff.

Our offense has not played the way everyone expected, but  there are few surprises on defense. Tampa Bay and Miami have been disappointing after they both finished with winning records last year.

Dempsey was talking about this on 1010xl this afternoon and he suggested it was less about moving the Jags/Hawks game and more about moving the Cowboys/Giants game to 1 pm as they expected to get more eyes on it at that time than they would have at the 4 pm slot. Secondly, FOX wants another game of interest at 4 pm to be able to kick over to in case the Eagles/Rams game winds up being a blowout.

(12-07-2017, 04:42 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: [ -> ]Dempsey was talking about this on 1010xl this afternoon and he suggested it was less about moving the Jags/Hawks game and more about moving the Cowboys/Giants game to 1 pm as they expected to get more eyes on it at that time than they would have at the 4 pm slot.  Secondly, FOX wants another game of interest at 4 pm to be able to kick over to in case the Eagles/Rams game winds up being a blowout.

The Cowboys/Giants game is a must-win for 6-6 Dallas, but otherwise, a late kickoff time made no sense. So it is natural they would want to move it up to 1:00 and switch a game with two legitimate playoff contenders (Seahawks/Jaguars) at the later time slot. A 4:25 kickoff for the Cowboys/Giants game made sense at the time because New York was by far the preseason favorite to win the NFCE. Now Ezekiel Elliott is suspended, Odell Beckham is on IR, Ben McAddo and Jerry Reese are unemployed, and Sean Lee is doubtful or out. It is all about putting a better game on at 4:25.

(12-07-2017, 05:36 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-07-2017, 04:42 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: [ -> ]Dempsey was talking about this on 1010xl this afternoon and he suggested it was less about moving the Jags/Hawks game and more about moving the Cowboys/Giants game to 1 pm as they expected to get more eyes on it at that time than they would have at the 4 pm slot.  Secondly, FOX wants another game of interest at 4 pm to be able to kick over to in case the Eagles/Rams game winds up being a blowout.

The Cowboys/Giants game is a must-win for 6-6 Dallas, but otherwise, a late kickoff time made no sense. So it is natural they would want to move it up to 1:00 and switch a game with two legitimate playoff contenders (Seahawks/Jaguars) at the later time slot. A 4:25 kickoff for the Cowboys/Giants game made sense at the time because New York was by far the preseason favorite to win the NFCE. Now Ezekiel Elliott is suspended, Odell Beckham is on IR, Ben McAddo and Jerry Reese are unemployed, and Sean Lee is doubtful or out. It is all about putting a better game on at 4:25.

You are wrong. No one except you said Sean Lee is doubtful or out. He returned to a limited practice on Wednesday and is closer to being back than being "doubtful" or "out" for sure. Stop making things up and do some research.

(12-07-2017, 05:46 PM)Brett Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-07-2017, 05:36 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]The Cowboys/Giants game is a must-win for 6-6 Dallas, but otherwise, a late kickoff time made no sense. So it is natural they would want to move it up to 1:00 and switch a game with two legitimate playoff contenders (Seahawks/Jaguars) at the later time slot. A 4:25 kickoff for the Cowboys/Giants game made sense at the time because New York was by far the preseason favorite to win the NFCE. Now Ezekiel Elliott is suspended, Odell Beckham is on IR, Ben McAddo and Jerry Reese are unemployed, and Sean Lee is doubtful or out. It is all about putting a better game on at 4:25.

You are wrong. No one except you said Sean Lee is doubtful or out. He returned to a limited practice on Wednesday and is closer to being back than being "doubtful" or "out" for sure. Stop making things up and do some research.

The game had to be flexed two weeks ago, when Sean Lee was doubtful or out. I just wrote it wrong.

(12-07-2017, 04:38 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-07-2017, 04:16 PM)D6 Wrote: [ -> ]The Jaguars exceeded expectations this season. I think the demand to see their game in their secondary markets is noticeably higher now than anticipated when the NFL Schedule was put together.

Every year the secondary market blocks me out of one game. It was the Rams game this year despite the 4:25 kickoff.

Our offense has not played the way everyone expected, but  there are few surprises on defense. Tampa Bay and Miami have been disappointing after they both finished with winning records last year.

The reason you didn't see the Jaguars game against the Rams game is why I think the upcoming game vs. the Seahawks was moved to 4:25pm.   The Bucs-Cardinals game was on at the same time as the Jaguars game against the Rams.

There's practically no way that the Bucs won't be on FOX in their Central and North Florida secondary markets regardless of what type of season they are having.   If they were 0-12, I strongly believe they would have been on in Orlando and Gainesville.  That much more with rookies  Jarrad Davis and Teez Tabor on the opposing team.   

The flex decision sure seems like a reflection of the Jaguars overall season far exceeding expectations of the NFL, FOX, and the vast majority of NFL fans in these Jaguars Secondary Markets.

(12-06-2017, 09:17 PM)JaguarsWoman Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-06-2017, 08:48 PM)hb1148 Wrote: [ -> ]Don't worry, we'll get all the coverage we'd want come Feb 4th.

Much earlier than that, obviously. We would get it most or all of January if that happens.

True, but we'd also get get great coverage then, assuming we get that far.