Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: It's Absolutely Electric Here
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
I was in Publix yesterday in Mandarin. I have never seen it more crowded and frenzied........the same was true at Costco. This town is really on fire!
It is so exciting......there are a lot of other teams fans up here in FB since they move here from up north.
This week though.... lots and lots of Jags swag.
(01-21-2018, 10:08 AM)Mowerguy Wrote: [ -> ]It is so exciting......there are a lot of other teams fans up here in FB since they move here from up north.
This week though.... lots and lots of Jags swag.

I’m sure I’m about to feel stupid, but what/where is FB?
(01-20-2018, 09:52 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]Everywhere I have been in Jacksonville this week, Jaguars stuff is everywhere.

I pass by people and catch snippets of conversations, and I hear Jaguars on peoples' lips.

I see the Jaguars logo and colors everywhere.  Stores that never featured Jaguars gear now feature it prominently.

Haven't seen this level of excitement in this town since 1996.

To me and the rest of us die hards, being a Jaguars fan is always cool.  But to the casual fan, being a Jaguars fan is cool again.

It's a beautiful thing to see and experience and it's way overdue.  Just think how nuts this town will be if we win tomorrow...and again in two weeks!

I remember when we first got the team.  For two to three weeks, people were walking around town with goofy grins of jubilation and disbelief.  People would see another wearing the Jaguars logo, and automatically a bond of sorts was created.  If we win tomorrow, the jubilation of late 1993 and early 1994 would be eclipsed.

The possibilities excite the hell outta me.

I had this exact same conversation with a friend of mine who is also an inaugural season ticket holder.  You’re seeing an explosion of interest as the team has turned the corner.  

It’s nice to see the new fans jumping on the bandwagon, but even more interesting to see old fans returning.  They’re easy to pick out with the old logo gear.  Depending on which logo they are sporting, you can determine when they jumped off the wagon.  

At dinner last night at a local haunt we frequent at the beach, we walked in with our gear on and actually had someone howl Duuuuvaaaallll!!!! From the bar, which got an immediate response from most of the patrons there.  This went on all night.  Pretty cool.
Sorry....FB...is short for Fernandina Beach
Tom Brady ain't ever seen a defense like this one.

He's going to end this game crying on the sidelines.
(01-21-2018, 10:51 AM)Mowerguy Wrote: [ -> ]Sorry....FB...is short for Fernandina Beach

Yep, I feel stupid now.  I was thinking of areas around and that one eluded me.
(01-21-2018, 10:53 AM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ]Tom Brady ain't ever seen a defense like this one.

He's going to end this game crying on the sidelines.

Your D is pretty good. It's not on the level of Seattle, which Brady has faced and has had success against. Whatever you bring, I'm confident BB will make adjustments as will Brady. Brady is stellar with his quick release. So I predict we'll see a lot of passes to the flat for the RBs. If we get a nice running game going, that will open the play-action, and that's when Brady can be deadly.

We shall see in a few hours..
(01-21-2018, 01:21 PM)furi0usbee Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-21-2018, 10:53 AM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ]Tom Brady ain't ever seen a defense like this one.

He's going to end this game crying on the sidelines.

Your D is pretty good. It's not on the level of Seattle, which Brady has faced and has had success against. Whatever you bring, I'm confident BB will make adjustments as will Brady. Brady is stellar with his quick release. So I predict we'll see a lot of passes to the flat for the RBs. If we get a nice running game going, that will open the play-action, and that's when Brady can be deadly.

We shall see in a few hours..

The Seattle defense that won the Super Bowl was a great defense, without question.

The year they won it, they recorded 44 sacks.  We had 55 this year.

The Super Bowl champion LOB defense had 4 defensive TDs.  The Jaguars have seven (7) this year.

2013 Seattle was first against the pass.  So were this year's Jaguars.

That Seattle defense forced more turnovers than we did.

Statistically, we're in the ball park with that Seattle team.

Our DL is better than theirs, as is our CBs and LBs. 

They had the edge at S.
(01-21-2018, 01:21 PM)furi0usbee Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-21-2018, 10:53 AM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ]Tom Brady ain't ever seen a defense like this one.

He's going to end this game crying on the sidelines.

Your D is pretty good. It's not on the level of Seattle, which Brady has faced and has had success against. Whatever you bring, I'm confident BB will make adjustments as will Brady. Brady is stellar with his quick release. So I predict we'll see a lot of passes to the flat for the RBs. If we get a nice running game going, that will open the play-action, and that's when Brady can be deadly.

We shall see in a few hours..

I hope that is the case.  The Jaguars speed on defense will shut that down quickly.
(01-21-2018, 01:33 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-21-2018, 01:21 PM)furi0usbee Wrote: [ -> ]Your D is pretty good. It's not on the level of Seattle, which Brady has faced and has had success against. Whatever you bring, I'm confident BB will make adjustments as will Brady. Brady is stellar with his quick release. So I predict we'll see a lot of passes to the flat for the RBs. If we get a nice running game going, that will open the play-action, and that's when Brady can be deadly.

We shall see in a few hours..

The Seattle defense that won the Super Bowl was a great defense, without question.

The year they won it, they recorded 44 sacks.  We had 55 this year.

The Super Bowl champion LOB defense had 4 defensive TDs.  The Jaguars have seven (7) this year.

2013 Seattle was first against the pass.  So were this year's Jaguars.

That Seattle defense forced more turnovers than we did.

Statistically, we're in the ball park with that Seattle team.

Our DL is better than theirs, as is our CBs and LBs. 

They had the edge at S.

To be fair, you had 20+ sacks total against two not-so-great offenses. That 55 wasn't for a consistent average across all games. I can see you getting to Brady maybe 3 times today. Anything more than that, and our O-line will have completely collapsed. I don't think your defense will play as badly as you did last week, but I don't expect the Patriots to have too much trouble scoring points today.

(01-21-2018, 01:40 PM)Scarecrow Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-21-2018, 01:21 PM)furi0usbee Wrote: [ -> ]Your D is pretty good. It's not on the level of Seattle, which Brady has faced and has had success against. Whatever you bring, I'm confident BB will make adjustments as will Brady. Brady is stellar with his quick release. So I predict we'll see a lot of passes to the flat for the RBs. If we get a nice running game going, that will open the play-action, and that's when Brady can be deadly.

We shall see in a few hours..

I hope that is the case.  The Jaguars speed on defense will shut that down quickly.

Defenses get tired chasing small, fast running backs. They don't want to be chasing Lewis or White all day...
(01-21-2018, 01:40 PM)furi0usbee Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-21-2018, 01:33 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]The Seattle defense that won the Super Bowl was a great defense, without question.

The year they won it, they recorded 44 sacks.  We had 55 this year.

The Super Bowl champion LOB defense had 4 defensive TDs.  The Jaguars have seven (7) this year.

2013 Seattle was first against the pass.  So were this year's Jaguars.

That Seattle defense forced more turnovers than we did.

Statistically, we're in the ball park with that Seattle team.

Our DL is better than theirs, as is our CBs and LBs. 

They had the edge at S.

To be fair, you had 20+ sacks total against two not-so-great offenses. That 55 wasn't for a consistent average across...

Been hearing this lazy 20 sack narrative all week. 
It's not about sack totals. 

It's about pressures and hits.  Go ahead and look up those numbers for the other teams we faced and get back to us. 

The Jags consistently pressure most of the QBs they face when they scheme pressure and aren't playing "contain." 

Opposing QBs have made errant throws and throw-aways due to pressure by this front four all season long.
(01-21-2018, 01:40 PM)furi0usbee Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-21-2018, 01:33 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]The Seattle defense that won the Super Bowl was a great defense, without question.

The year they won it, they recorded 44 sacks.  We had 55 this year.

The Super Bowl champion LOB defense had 4 defensive TDs.  The Jaguars have seven (7) this year.

2013 Seattle was first against the pass.  So were this year's Jaguars.

That Seattle defense forced more turnovers than we did.

Statistically, we're in the ball park with that Seattle team.

Our DL is better than theirs, as is our CBs and LBs. 

They had the edge at S.

To be fair, you had 20+ sacks total against two not-so-great offenses. That 55 wasn't for a consistent average across all games. I can see you getting to Brady maybe 3 times today. Anything more than that, and our O-line will have completely collapsed. I don't think your defense will play as badly as you did last week, but I don't expect the Patriots to have too much trouble scoring points today.

(01-21-2018, 01:40 PM)Scarecrow Wrote: [ -> ]I hope that is the case.  The Jaguars speed on defense will shut that down quickly.

Defenses get tired chasing small, fast running backs. They don't want to be chasing Lewis or White all day...

They will be hitting them near the line of scrimmage so they won't be chasing them far.

(01-21-2018, 01:44 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-21-2018, 01:40 PM)furi0usbee Wrote: [ -> ]To be fair, you had 20+ sacks total against two not-so-great offenses. That 55 wasn't for a consistent average across...

Been hearing this lazy 20 sack narrative all week. 
It's not about sack totals. 

It's about pressures and hits.  Go ahead and look up those numbers for the other teams we faced and get back to us. 

The Jags consistently pressure most of the QBs they face when they scheme pressure and aren't playing "contain." 

Opposing QBs have made errant throws and throw-aways due to pressure by this front four all season long.

This is a crucial point to hit on.  It isn't all about the sacks.  This DL has shown the ability to create consistent pressure in the majority of games this season.  QB pressures are more critical than sacks.  Sacks are a fluff stat and fun to talk about but what matters is the amount of pressure you can get.  This Jaguars team is capable of bringing a lot of heat on the QB.
(01-21-2018, 01:44 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-21-2018, 01:40 PM)furi0usbee Wrote: [ -> ]To be fair, you had 20+ sacks total against two not-so-great offenses. That 55 wasn't for a consistent average across...

Been hearing this lazy 20 sack narrative all week. 
It's not about sack totals. 

It's about pressures and hits.  Go ahead and look up those numbers for the other teams we faced and get back to us. 

The Jags consistently pressure most of the QBs they face when they scheme pressure and aren't playing "contain." 

Opposing QBs have made errant throws and throw-aways due to pressure by this front four all season long.

I've heard all about the 8 sacks against the tacks, while we only got 2. Nothing about the other 7 times Ben got hit, Brady goes down on most of those.
(01-21-2018, 01:40 PM)furi0usbee Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-21-2018, 01:33 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]The Seattle defense that won the Super Bowl was a great defense, without question.

The year they won it, they recorded 44 sacks.  We had 55 this year.

The Super Bowl champion LOB defense had 4 defensive TDs.  The Jaguars have seven (7) this year.

2013 Seattle was first against the pass.  So were this year's Jaguars.

That Seattle defense forced more turnovers than we did.

Statistically, we're in the ball park with that Seattle team.

Our DL is better than theirs, as is our CBs and LBs. 

They had the edge at S.

To be fair, you had 20+ sacks total against two not-so-great offenses. That 55 wasn't for a consistent average across all games. I can see you getting to Brady maybe 3 times today. Anything more than that, and our O-line will have completely collapsed. I don't think your defense will play as badly as you did last week, but I don't expect the Patriots to have too much trouble scoring points today.

You guys played against the Texans, did you not?

Did you guys register 10 sacks against them?
Dawg, I'm so hyped and ready! Duvvvvaaalllllllllllll !!!
Karma sent from Pittsburgh. Best of luck today.
(01-21-2018, 08:54 AM)furi0usbee Wrote: [ -> ]Final Score: NE 34 JAC 17

Y'all did win but not like this. Just had to point that out.  Cool
(01-21-2018, 10:51 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-21-2018, 08:54 AM)furi0usbee Wrote: [ -> ]Final Score: NE 34 JAC 17

Y'all did win but not like this. Just had to point that out.  Cool

Yup, I stand corrected. It was a tougher game than I thought it would be. Brady plus *any* time on the clock is all the hope Patriots fans need. You guys had a great season, hopefully you build upon it. See you next year!
Pages: 1 2