Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Stormy Daniels Interview
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
(03-26-2018, 12:52 PM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ]Look at pictures of Joe Biden touching kids. It's pretty... gross.

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=d44_1476984203
(03-26-2018, 08:20 AM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]Look. It was11 years ago before he was POTUS and still I private citizen. This Get Trump attitude of the left and the RINO's is getting old. What? Have the Democrats all become virgins all of a sudden? Seems to me I remember their Boy Clinton getting a Lewinsky and playing with a cigar in the White House. This is a Big Nothing Burger.

But it's not the same thing!!!!!- screams all the liberals. And it's not. It's much worse
(03-27-2018, 12:43 PM)pirkster Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-27-2018, 10:51 AM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]Contrary to what passes for you thinking, I didn't expect much from the interview. I know your boy has low moral character and no beautiful, or at least sexy, woman would have sex with him if he wasn't wealthy, it doesn't take the word of a porn actress to further convince me. I also know character is irrelevant to Trumpettes.

...says the Clinton supporter.

Truth is, his low character is still higher than the Clintons.  Which is sad for all of them.

You must ask yourself, what does that say about you...

...says the wannabee mind reader who knows nothing about who I support. The Clintons were the worst thing to happen to the Democratic party, and their hubris is the main reason we're stuck with Trump.

What does it say about you when your defense of Trump's character is the Clintons'?
(03-30-2018, 01:49 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-27-2018, 12:43 PM)pirkster Wrote: [ -> ]...says the Clinton supporter.

Truth is, his low character is still higher than the Clintons.  Which is sad for all of them.

You must ask yourself, what does that say about you...

...says the wannabee mind reader who knows nothing about who I support. The Clintons were the worst thing to happen to the Democratic party, and their hubris is the main reason we're stuck with Trump.

What does it say about you when your defense of Trump's character is the Clintons'?

He didn't really defend Trump's character.
In fact he clearly states "low character"
(03-30-2018, 01:59 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-30-2018, 01:49 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]...says the wannabee mind reader who knows nothing about who I support. The Clintons were the worst thing to happen to the Democratic party, and their hubris is the main reason we're stuck with Trump.

What does it say about you when your defense of Trump's character is the Clintons'?

He didn't really defend Trump's character.
In fact he clearly states "low character"

Fair enough, he just attempted to discredit my assessment of Trump by invoking the Clinton Clause. Trump may be bad, but those Clintons...
(03-30-2018, 05:20 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-30-2018, 01:59 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]He didn't really defend Trump's character.
In fact he clearly states "low character"

Fair enough, he just attempted to discredit my assessment of Trump by invoking the Clinton Clause. Trump may be bad, but those Clintons...

I was calling you out for faking to have standards, and claiming a high ground where there was none.

So, now you're upset that someone who is objective enough to acknowledge Trump's achievements (i.e. be intellectually honest - which you name call as "Trumpette"-ism) is actually illustrating relevancy to character, where you claimed character was irrelevant to such a person.

Is hypocrisy that reflexive to those infected by the cult of the left?
(03-30-2018, 05:27 PM)pirkster Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-30-2018, 05:20 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]Fair enough, he just attempted to discredit my assessment of Trump by invoking the Clinton Clause. Trump may be bad, but those Clintons...

I was calling you out for faking to have standards, and claiming a high ground where there was none.

So, now you're upset that someone who is objective enough to acknowledge Trump's achievements (i.e. be intellectually honest - which you name call as "Trumpette"-ism) is actually illustrating relevancy to character, where you claimed character was irrelevant to such a person.

Is hypocrisy that reflexive to those infected by the cult of the left?

Could you possibly be more obtuse? Is stereotyping any critic of Trump as a member of the cult of the left that reflexive to those infected by the cult of the right? You're fooling yourself if you think you're above the fray.

None of this upsets me, none of it has any direct affect on my life. I'm just a cynical observer of this ludicrous sideshow you and others put in the White House, with too much free time.

My opinion is Donald Trump is a piece of [BLEEP], an opinion formed over decades of paying attention to what he does and what he says. If he achieves good for the country, it will be despite his character flaws, and he will still be a piece of [BLEEP].

Again, the Clintons are bad. Trump is bad. The two are not mutually exclusive.
Speaking of Stormy Daniels, her lawyer is running rings about the Trump people.   It has nothing to do with facts, or laws, or anything.  The guy is so good at handling the media.  It's too bad for Trump that he can't hire him.   That guy is perfect for what Trump needs- a shark who is very media savvy.   If Stormy's lawyer was Trump's lawyer, Mueller would be a quivering mass of jelly by now.
(03-27-2018, 11:14 PM)TJBender Wrote: [ -> ]Mueller hasn't dropped any bombs lately, so CBS needed something to make everyone cry about.

so much for that.

[Image: 104534506-RTSVX0Z-michael-cohen.530x298....1523389627]
(04-10-2018, 09:22 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Speaking of Stormy Daniels, her lawyer is running rings about the Trump people.   It has nothing to do with facts, or laws, or anything.  The guy is so good at handling the media.  It's too bad for Trump that he can't hire him.   That guy is perfect for what Trump needs- a shark who is very media savvy.   If Stormy's lawyer was Trump's lawyer, Mueller would be a quivering mass of jelly by now.

Actually, it has everything to do with facts and laws.

Avenatti graduated #1 in his JD Class at George Washington University.  He's notches ahead regarding intelligence and the law so he knows exactly what he can and what he cannot do within the parameters of the law and he knows it.

You are correct in your statement that Trump really needs an Attorney like this.  Cohen apparently has never gone to trial so he's primarily a fixer that buys Trumps way out of lawsuits and adverse media releases.
I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure a billionaire real estate mogul turned reality TV star turned POTUS doesn't need lawyer advice from a football message board.
(04-13-2018, 12:36 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure a billionaire real estate mogul turned reality TV star turned POTUS doesn't need lawyer advice from a football message board.

I'm just guessing, but I'm betting you won't be ordering James Comey's book via Amazon.
(03-27-2018, 08:33 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]Stormy Daniels has a massive set of pupils.

http://www.businessinsider.com/stormy-da...ugs-2018-3

Exactly what I was thinking. She has two huge round.... um yeah... pupils
So... the slippery one slipped up again...

[Image: stormy_slipup.jpg]

Wonder if CBS will do a follow up interview and find out who IS paying him...
...nah.  The truth always gets in the way of good fiction.
(04-10-2018, 09:22 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Speaking of Stormy Daniels, her lawyer is running rings about the Trump people.   It has nothing to do with facts, or laws, or anything.  The guy is so good at handling the media.  It's too bad for Trump that he can't hire him.   That guy is perfect for what Trump needs- a shark who is very media savvy.   If Stormy's lawyer was Trump's lawyer, Mueller would be a quivering mass of jelly by now.

Your statement is incorrect.  He's running rings around the Trump people due to the fact that he knows the laws.  He graduated top of his class at George Washington Law School after graduating from Ivy League University of Pennsylvania.

The dude is super smart which gives him a major advantage when dealing with jokers like Michael Cohen who graduated from Western Michigan Law School.

Education and massive preparation are the keys to negotiation.  Trumps people seem to "wing it" on every subject matter.
Lol... "running rings"...

As in a porn circus, maybe...
(04-13-2018, 12:36 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure a billionaire real estate mogul turned reality TV star turned POTUS doesn't need lawyer advice from a football message board.

You mean that person posting under the username "pirkster" really isn't Trump?  Smile

What's next, are you going to tell me that Dave Caldwell and Tom Coughlin don't peak in here to see who they need to draft.
Seems Stormys 15 minutes are up. Maybe her and David Hogg can share a drink to discuss.
(05-04-2018, 11:13 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Seems Stormys 15 minutes are up. Maybe her and David Hogg can share a drink to discuss.

Maybe they can enjoy her pupils together over those drinks.  Big Grin
(05-05-2018, 12:04 AM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]
(05-04-2018, 11:13 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Seems Stormys 15 minutes are up. Maybe her and David Hogg can share a drink to discuss.

Maybe they can enjoy her pupils together over those drinks.  Big Grin

I'd assume Hogg is uninterested in anything she has to offer in the "asset" department.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5