03-29-2018, 11:31 AM
(03-26-2018, 12:52 PM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ]Look at pictures of Joe Biden touching kids. It's pretty... gross.
https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=d44_1476984203
(03-26-2018, 12:52 PM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ]Look at pictures of Joe Biden touching kids. It's pretty... gross.
(03-26-2018, 08:20 AM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]Look. It was11 years ago before he was POTUS and still I private citizen. This Get Trump attitude of the left and the RINO's is getting old. What? Have the Democrats all become virgins all of a sudden? Seems to me I remember their Boy Clinton getting a Lewinsky and playing with a cigar in the White House. This is a Big Nothing Burger.
(03-27-2018, 12:43 PM)pirkster Wrote: [ -> ](03-27-2018, 10:51 AM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]Contrary to what passes for you thinking, I didn't expect much from the interview. I know your boy has low moral character and no beautiful, or at least sexy, woman would have sex with him if he wasn't wealthy, it doesn't take the word of a porn actress to further convince me. I also know character is irrelevant to Trumpettes.
...says the Clinton supporter.
Truth is, his low character is still higher than the Clintons. Which is sad for all of them.
You must ask yourself, what does that say about you...
(03-30-2018, 01:49 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ](03-27-2018, 12:43 PM)pirkster Wrote: [ -> ]...says the Clinton supporter.
Truth is, his low character is still higher than the Clintons. Which is sad for all of them.
You must ask yourself, what does that say about you...
...says the wannabee mind reader who knows nothing about who I support. The Clintons were the worst thing to happen to the Democratic party, and their hubris is the main reason we're stuck with Trump.
What does it say about you when your defense of Trump's character is the Clintons'?
(03-30-2018, 01:59 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ](03-30-2018, 01:49 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]...says the wannabee mind reader who knows nothing about who I support. The Clintons were the worst thing to happen to the Democratic party, and their hubris is the main reason we're stuck with Trump.
What does it say about you when your defense of Trump's character is the Clintons'?
He didn't really defend Trump's character.
In fact he clearly states "low character"
(03-30-2018, 05:20 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ](03-30-2018, 01:59 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]He didn't really defend Trump's character.
In fact he clearly states "low character"
Fair enough, he just attempted to discredit my assessment of Trump by invoking the Clinton Clause. Trump may be bad, but those Clintons...
(03-30-2018, 05:27 PM)pirkster Wrote: [ -> ](03-30-2018, 05:20 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]Fair enough, he just attempted to discredit my assessment of Trump by invoking the Clinton Clause. Trump may be bad, but those Clintons...
I was calling you out for faking to have standards, and claiming a high ground where there was none.
So, now you're upset that someone who is objective enough to acknowledge Trump's achievements (i.e. be intellectually honest - which you name call as "Trumpette"-ism) is actually illustrating relevancy to character, where you claimed character was irrelevant to such a person.
Is hypocrisy that reflexive to those infected by the cult of the left?
(03-27-2018, 11:14 PM)TJBender Wrote: [ -> ]Mueller hasn't dropped any bombs lately, so CBS needed something to make everyone cry about.
(04-10-2018, 09:22 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Speaking of Stormy Daniels, her lawyer is running rings about the Trump people. It has nothing to do with facts, or laws, or anything. The guy is so good at handling the media. It's too bad for Trump that he can't hire him. That guy is perfect for what Trump needs- a shark who is very media savvy. If Stormy's lawyer was Trump's lawyer, Mueller would be a quivering mass of jelly by now.
(04-13-2018, 12:36 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure a billionaire real estate mogul turned reality TV star turned POTUS doesn't need lawyer advice from a football message board.
(03-27-2018, 08:33 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]Stormy Daniels has a massive set of pupils.
http://www.businessinsider.com/stormy-da...ugs-2018-3
(04-10-2018, 09:22 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Speaking of Stormy Daniels, her lawyer is running rings about the Trump people. It has nothing to do with facts, or laws, or anything. The guy is so good at handling the media. It's too bad for Trump that he can't hire him. That guy is perfect for what Trump needs- a shark who is very media savvy. If Stormy's lawyer was Trump's lawyer, Mueller would be a quivering mass of jelly by now.
(04-13-2018, 12:36 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure a billionaire real estate mogul turned reality TV star turned POTUS doesn't need lawyer advice from a football message board.
(05-04-2018, 11:13 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Seems Stormys 15 minutes are up. Maybe her and David Hogg can share a drink to discuss.
(05-05-2018, 12:04 AM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ](05-04-2018, 11:13 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Seems Stormys 15 minutes are up. Maybe her and David Hogg can share a drink to discuss.
Maybe they can enjoy her pupils together over those drinks.