(05-15-2018, 06:44 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (05-15-2018, 06:40 PM)Jamies_fried_chicken Wrote: [ -> ]Are you going to actually type a response to my initial post regarding if Trump can seize the weapons Regan sold to Iran? Or are you going to continue heed your own advice as stated above?
Nah, I'm going to sit here and critique your continued misspelling of the guy's name instead.
As for responding, I direct you to the Tower Commission report to improve your understanding of the Iran-Contra Affair.
So you got hot and bothered by me misspelling Reagan's name as Regan? That's a snowflake move.
The Tower Commission report was just a updated summary of what Lebannon leaked already, they couldn't even subpoena anyone, so if you are basing your knowledge and research off of that alone, you need to do more work.
(05-15-2018, 06:55 PM)Jamies_fried_chicken Wrote: [ -> ] (05-15-2018, 06:44 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Nah, I'm going to sit here and critique your continued misspelling of the guy's name instead.
As for responding, I direct you to the Tower Commission report to improve your understanding of the Iran-Contra Affair.
So you got hot and bothered by me misspelling Reagan's name as Regan? That's a snowflake move.
The Tower Commission report was just a updated summary of what Lebannon leaked already, they couldn't even subpoena anyone, so if you are basing your knowledge and research off of that alone, you need to do more work.
Hot and bothered? More like chill and smirking.
The Tower Commission is the official report, such as it is, and the Congressional report, created by the opposition party no less, also left the matter undetermined on Reagan's involvement (though not his ultimate culpability as is proper).
Ah... right. Dat debul Reagan. Greatest prosperity in recent times.
30 years? What’s the shelf life for weapons? Should we be concerned about cannons and muskets still?
He didn't really just try to bring up Iran Contra did he?