Cancer Institute Finally Admits Marijuana Kills Cancer
Cancer kills nearly 600,000 Americans per year. And this year alone, over 1.6 million people will be diagnosed. So much time and research has gone into the cure of cancer in the last few decades. Yet, because of the stigma associated with marijuana, this wonder plant has been largely ignored by governments and researchers as a potential cure – or a key piece to a cure at least.
http://ushealthmagz.com/2018/05/04/cance...ls-cancer/
Not sure how serious I can take a site that uses a z in place of an s
(05-22-2018, 04:57 PM)My Desired Display Name Wrote: [ -> ]Not sure how serious I can take a site that uses a z in place of an s
I'm taking it 100% zeriouzly.
This is good news, I've spent nearly a lifetime preemptively treating myself for cancer.
(05-22-2018, 04:57 PM)My Desired Display Name Wrote: [ -> ]Not sure how serious I can take a site that uses a z in place of an s
The Bloods don't use the letter C
The Crips don't use the letter B
Perhaps This is the evolution of gang-style media ..... notice Fox News doesn't use the letter C and CNN doesn't use the letter F
(except for a little fake news here and there).
Check out Rick Simpson and his oil techniques. It's beneficial to the body for those going through or recovering from Cancer. I know of two people close to my family personally that have adopted this method and they've been able to maintain and damn near reverse the Cancer. You can also alter your diet to assist in restricting the growth or outright killing Cancer cells in your body by adhering to a healthy diet rich in fats and proteins and by severely limiting or outright cutting highly processed carbohydrates and sugars.
I also recommend the Ketogenic diet. You can look into this as well if anyone's interested. Also you can apparently eat apricot seeds in small amounts (maybe two to three seeds at a time, and then gradually build up to a few doses per day) which is high in vitamin B17 which has been linked and reported to also killing or reversing the effects of Cancer cells in your body. But always start with your diet when you're sick. Most doctor's in the Cancer field RARELY bring this up. Because they're trained to issue out pills or chemotherapy to get the cancer treatment routines going. Which rarely works by all accounts.
But definitely look into the effects of sugar and processed carbohydrates in the human body when it comes to feeding and supporting Cancer cells. That seems to be the primary contributor to Cancer growth and development within our bodies for roughly 70% or more of the various types of Cancers out there. But to anybody on here struggling with Cancer. It's not a Death Sentence. It's a disease. And for the most part. You can find a way to cure it or at least stunt any potential spreading or growth of it by just making a few critical changes to your daily routine. Good luck to all of you.
(05-23-2018, 12:38 PM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ]...look into the effects of sugar and processed carbohydrates in the human body when it comes to feeding and supporting Cancer cells.
So much this, and not just cancer.
(05-23-2018, 11:24 AM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]This is good news, I've spent nearly a lifetime preemptively treating myself for cancer.
Congrats, you’re now immortal.
(05-23-2018, 06:32 PM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ] (05-23-2018, 11:24 AM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]This is good news, I've spent nearly a lifetime preemptively treating myself for cancer.
Congrats, you’re now immortal.
Unfortunately, cancer ain't the only thing killing folks.
(05-23-2018, 06:58 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ] (05-23-2018, 06:32 PM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ]Congrats, you’re now immortal.
Unfortunately, cancer ain't the only thing killing folks.
True, just seems like cancer is usually the culprit more often than not these days,
(05-23-2018, 01:31 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ] (05-23-2018, 12:38 PM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ]...look into the effects of sugar and processed carbohydrates in the human body when it comes to feeding and supporting Cancer cells.
So much this, and not just cancer.
Absolutely. Also look into pH levels. An acid pH level facilitates cancer growth while alkaline pH kills it. A pH of 7 is neutral; the blood should be slightly alkaline at 7.3 - 7.5 pH.
I believe we all carry the building blocks for cancer but it cannot thrive unless our systems become too acidic.
Some cancers can be cured with a combination of maple syrup and baking soda. The sugar acts as a Trojan horse, carrying the soda to the cancerous cells where the alkalinity kills the cancer.
(05-27-2018, 09:06 AM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: [ -> ] (05-23-2018, 01:31 PM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]So much this, and not just cancer.
Absolutely. Also look into pH levels. An acid pH level facilitates cancer growth while alkaline pH kills it. A pH of 7 is neutral; the blood should be slightly alkaline at 7.3 - 7.5 pH.
I believe we all carry the building blocks for cancer but it cannot thrive unless our systems become too acidic.
Some cancers can be cured with a combination of maple syrup and baking soda. The sugar acts as a Trojan horse, carrying the soda to the cancerous cells where the alkalinity kills the cancer.
Please don't spread that quackery; human physiology and basic chemistry do not work like that, and zero cancers are cured that way. It's the inverse of the IPT quackery and just as ineffective.
Many cancers have been cured with baking soda. Even some oncologists are coming around. A doctor who specializes in late-stage cancers said the first thing he does is put his patients on sodium bicarbonate. My Dad has his book but I don't recall the doc's name.
The main problem is the FDA and AMA. It is illegal to claim that anything but FDA-approved pharmaceuticals can treat, cure or prevent disease. It is illegal for a clinician to claim that scurvy can be cured with limes, though this has been common knowledge for centuries. The thought police are literally killing us by banning treatments that do not generate a profit.
(05-27-2018, 01:33 PM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: [ -> ]Many cancers have been cured with baking soda. Even some oncologists are coming around. A doctor who specializes in late-stage cancers said the first thing he does is put his patients on sodium bicarbonate. My Dad has his book but I don't recall the doc's name.
The main problem is the FDA and AMA. It is illegal to claim that anything but FDA-approved pharmaceuticals can treat, cure or prevent disease. It is illegal for a clinician to claim that scurvy can be cured with limes, though this has been common knowledge for centuries. The thought police are literally killing us by banning treatments that do not generate a profit.
I should ban you for this claptrap.
(05-27-2018, 02:14 PM)DragonFury Wrote: [ -> ] (05-27-2018, 01:33 PM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: [ -> ]Many cancers have been cured with baking soda. Even some oncologists are coming around. A doctor who specializes in late-stage cancers said the first thing he does is put his patients on sodium bicarbonate. My Dad has his book but I don't recall the doc's name.
The main problem is the FDA and AMA. It is illegal to claim that anything but FDA-approved pharmaceuticals can treat, cure or prevent disease. It is illegal for a clinician to claim that scurvy can be cured with limes, though this has been common knowledge for centuries. The thought police are literally killing us by banning treatments that do not generate a profit.
I should ban you for this claptrap.
No doubt.
(05-27-2018, 02:14 PM)DragonFury Wrote: [ -> ] (05-27-2018, 01:33 PM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: [ -> ]Many cancers have been cured with baking soda. Even some oncologists are coming around. A doctor who specializes in late-stage cancers said the first thing he does is put his patients on sodium bicarbonate. My Dad has his book but I don't recall the doc's name.
The main problem is the FDA and AMA. It is illegal to claim that anything but FDA-approved pharmaceuticals can treat, cure or prevent disease. It is illegal for a clinician to claim that scurvy can be cured with limes, though this has been common knowledge for centuries. The thought police are literally killing us by banning treatments that do not generate a profit.
I should ban you for this claptrap.
Which part wasn't true? The oncologist or the limes?
(05-27-2018, 01:33 PM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: [ -> ]Many cancers have been cured with baking soda. Even some oncologists are coming around. A doctor who specializes in late-stage cancers said the first thing he does is put his patients on sodium bicarbonate. My Dad has his book but I don't recall the doc's name.
The main problem is the FDA and AMA. It is illegal to claim that anything but FDA-approved pharmaceuticals can treat, cure or prevent disease. It is illegal for a clinician to claim that scurvy can be cured with limes, though this has been common knowledge for centuries. The thought police are literally killing us by banning treatments that do not generate a profit.
Do you have a source for this claim, or did you pull yet another load of [BLEEP] out of your [BLEEP] to create a bogus conspiracy? Everything I can find says Vitamin C in any form is a common treatment for scurvy.
I pulled it off the FDA website.
"It is a violation of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to market and sell products that claim to prevent, diagnose, treat, mitigate or cure diseases without first demonstrating to the FDA that they are safe and effective for their labeled uses. "
https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/...554698.htm
I asked my late-night pharmacist if they carried FDA-approved limes. She said no but the grocery store has limes.
I didn't report her.
[EDIT]
rj, you are correct about the vitamin C as a treatment and what I posted was essentially backwards. A doctor who recommended citrus for scurvy would not get in trouble. It would only be a violation if the growers or sellers of citrus made the claim that it cures scurvy. It can be used to cure scurvy but as noted above, sellers can't claim it cures scurvy unless they submit to FDA testing and approval.
(05-27-2018, 10:35 PM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: [ -> ]I pulled it off the FDA website.
"It is a violation of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to market and sell products that claim to prevent, diagnose, treat, mitigate or cure diseases without first demonstrating to the FDA that they are safe and effective for their labeled uses. "
https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/...554698.htm
I asked my late-night pharmacist if they carried FDA-approved limes. She said no but the grocery store has limes.
I didn't report her.
[EDIT]
rj, you are correct about the vitamin C as a treatment and what I posted was essentially backwards. A doctor who recommended citrus for scurvy would not get in trouble. It would only be a violation if the growers or sellers of citrus made the claim that it cures scurvy. It can be used to cure scurvy but as noted above, sellers can't claim it cures scurvy unless they submit to FDA testing and approval.
Let’s completely ignore the baking soda cancer cure.
I've also heard about the pH stuff and acidic stuff. I don't know enough about it though to say it's effective or if it truly works. I've just tried to scale my beliefs down to a simple concept and I think it makes a ton of sense when you look at the statistics in our country. The original USDA Food Guide Pyramid is terribly wrong and it was honestly engineered to benefit and fit the market needs at the time for agriculture. And it's the reason why we saw a sudden explosion in various health issues related to diet and also why people just started getting sicker by the year.
6 - 11 servings per day of cereal, rice, and pasta isn't a great idea. You may be able to get away with that if you're some sort of athlete or work a very active job but it's not that common at all for most Americans today who sit at a desk or office for a living. But you can keep it very, very simple. Just look at how our ancestors had to eat before the industrial and highly processing of food age had came into existence. The old hunter and gather mentality. Our ancestors didn't have a grocery store where you could be picky and choosy. You ate what was around you and what was seasonal or sustainable. And even back then with certain grains and proteins you at least knew it was in it's base form.
A lot of today's foods, even the foods deemed "healthy" still have a [BLEEP] ton of additives and preservatives to keep it's shelf life through the roof. That should be a good rule of thumb for you while shopping. If something has more than three to four ingredients in it or on it then is it really food? Or is it just some [BLEEP]? A lot of people also complain about the good foods being too expensive. I completely agree and understand the frustration with that. BUT...but... if you pay attention to serving sizes and macros you would realize it's not so bad paying $9.99 for a pound or two of raw almonds when you consider that 1/4 cup of Almonds is roughly 200 calories. And most containers have anywhere between 12 - 20 servings depending on where you buy.
That's something I've learned on this diet. When you start eating more healthier fats and proteins in your diet. And the only source of carbohydrates is coming from sources like leafy greens or most vegetables you're at least getting a ton of fiber which keeps you full throughout the day. I eat between 1400 - 1800 calories a day. And it's usually 130 - 150 grams of healthy fats, 60 - 70 grams of good sources of protein and then no more than 20 grams of carbohydrates and maybe 5 - 10 grams of sugar. When I wasn't being lazy and staying disciplined I dropped down from 304 to 261 between last year back in the beginning of June - Thanksgiving of last year. That Ketogenic diet works. Just takes time for your body to adjust. I've since slumped back into old habits and packed the weight back on but, again, that's because I am lazy at times.
But it's doable. When I was able to maintain it for 5 months I saw a huge increase in my energy levels. I started sleeping much deeper. My skin cleared up better. Even my allergies seemed to get better. I found myself sneezing less and less around my own dog and my family and friend's dogs as well.