Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Packers/Rodgers Agree to Big$$ Extension
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
(08-31-2018, 09:22 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-31-2018, 09:17 PM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]
I'm saying there is no real difference in supporting cast between Bortles or Rodgers.
One good player, not even a really good player. Now if Bortles fails to win us a ring and we are going back to a rookie QB as you suggested then there is more flexibility to keep building a supporting cast...but that's 2-3 years down the road and we're screwed regardless.

I don't understand your first sentence.  Are you saying there's "no real difference" between the #2 defense in the league and the #22 defense in the league?

In the potential ability to build a supporting cast around either...in the hypothetical world that the dude made up that I was originally playing along with.
(08-31-2018, 10:00 PM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-31-2018, 09:22 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]I don't understand your first sentence.  Are you saying there's "no real difference" between the #2 defense in the league and the #22 defense in the league?

In the potential ability to build a supporting cast around either...in the hypothetical world that the dude made up that I was originally playing along with.

Definitely two different "worlds" in this conversation, LOL. I'm talking about just giving up one contract and player for the other  --  in the otherwise current reality. 

Not in a different world.
Pages: 1 2