(09-09-2018, 05:45 PM)Eye of the Storm Wrote: [ -> ] (09-09-2018, 04:45 PM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ]My take is the 50/50 calls always seem to go against us. I know I am biased but dang. Also it seems (again biased) that we get every questionable call against us at the most inopportune time. But hey we won!
It’s funny how opposing fans see the same game. I found this gem on the Giants MB:
IMO the vast majority of close calls today went against the Giants... we got a few, but there were more questionable decisions against us. Bob
True, but New England fans thought the same thing.
(09-09-2018, 04:10 PM)JagsFanSince95 Wrote: [ -> ]We got hosed a few times more than the Giants but I honestly think those guys just kinda stink at getting calls right at times, even when the are standing right there watching something go down. We got the W so its not as bad now, at least.
Can someone explain to me how that wasn't a pick against Ramsey when OBJ had his biggest play of the game?
(09-09-2018, 04:14 PM)MoJagFan Wrote: [ -> ]Because we won it makes me be more objective with hindsight. That said... I tuned into the Giants Broadcast on Fox TV. Jeez proving why big market guys moving to the broadcast booth leads to bias broadcasting.
I think Romo and Akin are good in contrast to what we got today.
OMG!
That was like a Giants home preseason broadcast!
I disagree with all of those suggesting it was a fairly called game. Although there were a few calls on each team that maybe shouldnt have been called, i did see enough non-holding calls to last for the rest of the season. And the big pick/block-knockdown early in the game that gave the giants a big gain that was so obvious that i couldnt believe the broascaster didnt even bring it up.
Actually for the record, i wasnt surprised that they didnt mention it.