Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

(11-09-2018, 10:16 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-09-2018, 09:53 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]I actually agree with this statement. The Democratic party screwed themselves by forcing Hillary down everyone's throats. When I looked at the last presidential ballot I saw two people (Trump and Hillary), that I did not like and did not respect. That is why I voted 3rd party. I may not like many politicians at all, but they at least have to earn my respect, for me to vote for them. Both parties failed miserably at putting respectable candidates on the ballot. As far as Bernie goes, I still believe he could beat Trump, but the Democratic party will never allow him to get that chance with their current leadership, because he is too radical for them. They want to keep the same old ideas and people are rebelling against them. That party needs new leadership or they will fail again.

Bernie was too radical for them. He isn't anymore.

He's now just slightly left to the modern democrat party. The party is moving closer to him. In 2009, 1/3 of Senators voted similarly to Bernie 90% of the time with 9 of them at or above 94%.

Today, he votes in unison with Schumer (84%), Leahy (80%), Blumenthal (85%), and Warren (93%) most of the time. I wouldn't be surprised if they throw him up there as a candidate since they know how popular he was.

Hillary Clinton supposedly still bears a high degree of influence within the Democratic Party. A real push to put Sanders in as the nominee would put that to the test.

...and make her leave the public life forever?

I mean I can't imagine them running Hillary again. That just seems crazy.

(11-10-2018, 12:39 AM)Inziladun Wrote: [ -> ]I mean I can't imagine them running Hillary again. That just seems crazy.

The only other choices are Moochelle and Sandersnista. That's what's really crazy, it's the Politics of Jealousy fully conquering the Democrat Party.

(11-10-2018, 07:28 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-10-2018, 12:39 AM)Inziladun Wrote: [ -> ]I mean I can't imagine them running Hillary again. That just seems crazy.

The only other choices are Moochelle and Sandersnista. That's what's really crazy, it's the Politics of Jealousy fully conquering the Democrat Party.

I don't blame you for being here 24/7 trying to deflect, deflect, deflect.

You're embarrassed, I get it. Donald's brand of Nationalist stupidity, ignorance, and laziness is appealing to fewer and fewer voters.

But hold high the banner for the middle-aged Angry While Male!

(11-10-2018, 10:52 AM)Adam2012 Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-10-2018, 07:28 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]The only other choices are Moochelle and Sandersnista. That's what's really crazy, it's the Politics of Jealousy fully conquering the Democrat Party.

I don't blame you for being here 24/7 trying to deflect, deflect, deflect.

You're embarrassed, I get it. Donald's brand of Nationalist stupidity, ignorance, and laziness is appealing to fewer and fewer voters.

But hold high the banner for the middle-aged Angry While Male!

You keep on believing junior.

Hillary is the DNC and the DNC is Hillary. I would direct any doubters to Wikileaks. Hillary is the only hurdle for MObama and it is a big one. But MObama could be uniquely untouchable politically. She would be positioned as a beloved figure, a unifier for the fractured left and also for moderates of both parties. Policy, schmolicy, what we need is a break from orange man bad. Who cares that she has no experience except knowing the White House floor plan? She can always ask Valerie Jarrett or Oprah what to do about Iran.

(11-10-2018, 01:30 PM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: [ -> ]Hillary is the DNC and the DNC is Hillary.  I would direct any doubters to Wikileaks.  Hillary is the only hurdle for MObama and it is a big one.  But MObama could be uniquely untouchable politically.  She would be positioned as a beloved figure, a unifier for the fractured left and also for moderates of both parties.  Policy, schmolicy, what we need is a break from orange man bad.  Who cares that she has no experience except knowing the White House floor plan?  She can always ask Valerie Jarrett or Oprah what to do about Iran.

No more "outsiders" without political experience on either side. Been there, done that, got screwed!

(11-10-2018, 10:52 AM)Adam2012 Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-10-2018, 07:28 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]The only other choices are Moochelle and Sandersnista. That's what's really crazy, it's the Politics of Jealousy fully conquering the Democrat Party.

I don't blame you for being here 24/7 trying to deflect, deflect, deflect.

You're embarrassed, I get it. Donald's brand of Nationalist stupidity, ignorance, and laziness is appealing to fewer and fewer voters.

But hold high the banner for the middle-aged Angry While Male!

So you think that putting the interests of foreign countries ahead of the US is the way a President should govern?

(11-10-2018, 03:25 PM)MalabarJag Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-10-2018, 10:52 AM)Adam2012 Wrote: [ -> ]I don't blame you for being here 24/7 trying to deflect, deflect, deflect.

You're embarrassed, I get it. Donald's brand of Nationalist stupidity, ignorance, and laziness is appealing to fewer and fewer voters.

But hold high the banner for the middle-aged Angry While Male!

So you think that putting the interests of foreign countries ahead of the US is the way a President should govern?

Some of them really do despise this country.

On the other hand, if they let MObama speak, it could be all over.

She told Good Morning America that when she got to the White House in 2008, there were people who didn't know what a black woman was or sounded like.

(11-11-2018, 10:15 AM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: [ -> ]On the other hand, if they let MObama speak, it could be all over.  

She told Good Morning America that when she got to the White House in 2008, there were people who didn't know what a black woman was or sounded like.

Nah, there's a significant portion of the Electorate who only have their victim status confirmed by that nonsense and lap it up.

A former Clinton advisor said she will be running again. Interested to see if the up and comers clear the stage for her.

(11-11-2018, 11:15 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]A former Clinton advisor said she will be running again. Interested to see if the up and comers clear the stage for her.

If we get another election where it's down to Trump and Hillary, I'm gonna jump off a bridge!

(11-11-2018, 11:21 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-11-2018, 11:15 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]A former Clinton advisor said she will be running again. Interested to see if the up and comers clear the stage for her.

If we get another election where it's down to Trump and Hillary, I'm gonna jump off a bridge!

It's going to happen, and the electoral vote will be identical if not more favorable for Trump. Especially with how the democuildingrats handle their first taste of power in a long time these next 2 years. They just can't help themselves.

(11-11-2018, 11:15 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]A former Clinton advisor said she will be running again. Interested to see if the up and comers clear the stage for her.

I thought Satan had retired from the consulting biz?

(11-12-2018, 12:59 AM)TJBender Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-11-2018, 11:15 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]A former Clinton advisor said she will be running again. Interested to see if the up and comers clear the stage for her.

I thought Satan had retired from the consulting biz?

(11-12-2018, 12:59 AM)TJBender Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-11-2018, 11:15 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]A former Clinton advisor said she will be running again. Interested to see if the up and comers clear the stage for her.

I thought Satan had retired from the consulting biz?

I just can't help myself. I can't wait. This is going to be absolutely hilarious. You have these establishment young bucks like Booker, Harris, and Gillibrand who will likely quickly fold if Hill-dog decides to run. You have the "older guard" like Warren & Biden who who may put up more of a fight, then...... you have creepy porn lawyer who will not follow any protocols and just be a bull in a china shop during the debates. There are probably 15 additional people I am missing, but they will all be irrelevant. Avenatti is actually playing this very smart. He is already selling the fact that it will take a "special kind of person" to beat Trump, and he is right.

The big question is, will the PAC's throw their money behind Clinton again or someone else?

(11-12-2018, 08:22 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-12-2018, 12:59 AM)TJBender Wrote: [ -> ]I thought Satan had retired from the consulting biz?

I just can't help myself. I can't wait. This is going to be absolutely hilarious. You have these establishment young bucks like Booker, Harris, and Gillibrand who will likely quickly fold if Hill-dog decides to run. You have the "older guard" like Warren & Biden who who may put up more of a fight, then...... you have creepy porn lawyer who will not follow any protocols and just be a bull in a china shop during the debates. There are probably 15 additional people I am missing, but they will all be irrelevant. Avenatti is actually playing this very smart. He is already selling the fact that it will take a "special kind of person" to beat Trump, and he is right.

The big question is, will the PAC's throw their money behind Clinton again or someone else?

Ahem...

(11-12-2018, 09:17 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]

(11-12-2018, 08:22 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]I just can't help myself. I can't wait. This is going to be absolutely hilarious. You have these establishment young bucks like Booker, Harris, and Gillibrand who will likely quickly fold if Hill-dog decides to run. You have the "older guard" like Warren & Biden who who may put up more of a fight, then...... you have creepy porn lawyer who will not follow any protocols and just be a bull in a china shop during the debates. There are probably 15 additional people I am missing, but they will all be irrelevant. Avenatti is actually playing this very smart. He is already selling the fact that it will take a "special kind of person" to beat Trump, and he is right.

The big question is, will the PAC's throw their money behind Clinton again or someone else?

Ahem...

Dang, how did I forget Hillary's whipping boy, ugg! He took it on the chin from Hill-dog and still came crawing back to her after she rigged the democratic primary.

WSJ says Hillary will absolutely run in 2020.