(11-16-2018, 01:48 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-16-2018, 01:45 PM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: [ -> ]if it's on Breitbart.com it mus be true.
It was a Matt Gaetz quote. Does it matter where it was published? Are you implying there is no truth to Florida Rep's Matt Gaetz' thoughts?
Apparently it does.
If someone posts a NY Times article or CNN, it's quickly met with disdain.
(11-16-2018, 02:09 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ] (11-16-2018, 01:48 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]It was a Matt Gaetz quote. Does it matter where it was published? Are you implying there is no truth to Florida Rep's Matt Gaetz' thoughts?
Apparently it does.
If someone posts a NY Times article or CNN, it's quickly met with disdain.
Disdain and authenticity are two different things.
Poor Young Kim was in freshman orientation when they told her about FINDING VOTES.... WOW.
(11-16-2018, 01:33 PM)Adam2012 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-16-2018, 01:20 PM)MoJagFan Wrote: [ -> ]Aint the party of JFK anymore. JFK believed in tax cuts and citizen participation. He wouldn't win the nomination today. Heck when you read Clinton's immigration policy speeches, he wouldn't get elected today. And some of them are running as active socialists. Yeah vote Democrat.
And Republicans used to be for limited government, tax cuts, and against deficits and the national debt. Eisenhower wouldn't win the nomination today. Some of them are running as active Nationalists. Yeah vote Republican.
I got to vote for one of the few limited government senators this election season. Was very happy when the democratic socialist lost.
(11-16-2018, 01:33 PM)Adam2012 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-16-2018, 01:20 PM)MoJagFan Wrote: [ -> ]Aint the party of JFK anymore. JFK believed in tax cuts and citizen participation. He wouldn't win the nomination today. Heck when you read Clinton's immigration policy speeches, he wouldn't get elected today. And some of them are running as active socialists. Yeah vote Democrat.
And Republicans used to be for limited government, tax cuts, and against deficits and the national debt. Eisenhower wouldn't win the nomination today. Some of them are running as active Nationalists. Yeah vote Republican.
Eisenhower was a nationalist.
(11-16-2018, 01:33 PM)Adam2012 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-16-2018, 01:20 PM)MoJagFan Wrote: [ -> ]Aint the party of JFK anymore. JFK believed in tax cuts and citizen participation. He wouldn't win the nomination today. Heck when you read Clinton's immigration policy speeches, he wouldn't get elected today. And some of them are running as active socialists. Yeah vote Democrat.
And Republicans used to be for limited government, tax cuts, and against deficits and the national debt. Eisenhower wouldn't win the nomination today. Some of them are running as active Nationalists. Yeah vote Republican.
Then neither would John Kennedy or Bill Clinton.
People think the frigging American President should not be a Nationalist. You just can't make this [BLEEP] up.
(11-17-2018, 09:36 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]People think the frigging American President should not be a Nationalist. You just can't make this [BLEEP] up.
People just create their own definition for the term to fit their narrative, even though Trump has continuously said what his definition of the word is.
(11-17-2018, 09:36 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]People think the frigging American President should not be a Nationalist. You just can't make this [BLEEP] up.
It's racist to be Amerikkkan, sir.
(11-14-2018, 09:11 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]One of my favorite Rep's, Matt Gaetz is right. The democrats are stress testing the system to see how they can steal 2020. This is frightening and needs to be fixed.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/...teal-2020/
I think you're giving the democrats a little too much credit for brains.
(11-18-2018, 10:03 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ] (11-14-2018, 09:11 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]One of my favorite Rep's, Matt Gaetz is right. The democrats are stress testing the system to see how they can steal 2020. This is frightening and needs to be fixed.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/...teal-2020/
I think you're giving the democrats a little too much credit for brains.
I think California, New York, New Jersey, and Florida are coordinated sites of Democratic voter fraud schemes.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/michiga...ud-charges
Another instance of 'no voter fraud.'
"According to court documents, Michigan police found that 193 absentee voter files were changed in the city’s computer system to say they either had no signature or no return date, when they had both valid signatures and return dates. Police stated that after Oakland County Election Director Joseph Rozell found that Hawkins had submitted altered reports, his staff found the original ones in a trash can at the election division office."
(09-24-2019, 09:56 PM)HandsomeRob86 Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.foxnews.com/politics/michiga...ud-charges
Another instance of 'no voter fraud.'
"According to court documents, Michigan police found that 193 absentee voter files were changed in the city’s computer system to say they either had no signature or no return date, when they had both valid signatures and return dates. Police stated that after Oakland County Election Director Joseph Rozell found that Hawkins had submitted altered reports, his staff found the original ones in a trash can at the election division office."
First, 193 votes is unlikely to be enough to change any outcomes.
Second,
"Benson insisted that the alleged fraud did not affect the outcome of the election.
“All valid votes in the election were ultimately counted and the final official vote total was accurate,” she said, according to [font=Roboto,]The Detroit News."[/font]
(09-25-2019, 10:16 AM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ] (09-25-2019, 09:24 AM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]Est. 2015
Update 2019
From your opinion piece with a smattering of fact... "Here, voters were the victims of a partisan plot to further rig an already rigged system. This is a fraud on the entire democratic process, and those responsible very nearly got away with it". Boy, sure sounds like we could use Federal Voter IDs. But of course, Dems don't want to solve the issue because then they can't capitalize on the corruption. Rules only flow in one direction, right?
I see your update and give you....
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/l...416101001/
(09-25-2019, 10:24 AM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ] (09-25-2019, 10:16 AM)rollerjag Wrote: [ -> ]Update 2019
From your opinion piece with a smattering of fact... "Here, voters were the victims of a partisan plot to further rig an already rigged system. This is a fraud on the entire democratic process, and those responsible very nearly got away with it". Boy, sure sounds like we could use Federal Voter IDs. But of course, Dems don't want to solve the issue because then they can't capitalize on the corruption. Rules only flow in one direction, right?
I see your update and give you.... https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/l...416101001/
A federal ID for voting might be a good idea, but, most people in *both* parties think it's a bad idea at the moment.
You can't blame Democrats for that one.
(10-10-2019, 03:33 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (09-25-2019, 10:24 AM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]From your opinion piece with a smattering of fact... "Here, voters were the victims of a partisan plot to further rig an already rigged system. This is a fraud on the entire democratic process, and those responsible very nearly got away with it". Boy, sure sounds like we could use Federal Voter IDs. But of course, Dems don't want to solve the issue because then they can't capitalize on the corruption. Rules only flow in one direction, right?
I see your update and give you.... https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/l...416101001/
A federal ID for voting might be a good idea, but, most people in *both* parties think it's a bad idea at the moment.
You can't blame Democrats for that one.
Sure sounds like speculation.