So 3 points a half is acceptable?
Bortles was ten times better v the colts 3 weeks back when the D gave up a bunch early.
(12-02-2018, 03:13 PM)jagman Wrote: [ -> ]I can't think of a QB that would be effective behind this offensive line.
BB5 Cause he is used to it
(12-02-2018, 03:16 PM)lastonealive Wrote: [ -> ]So 3 points a half is acceptable?
Bortles was ten times better v the colts 3 weeks back when the D gave up a bunch early.
Nice try.
(12-02-2018, 03:15 PM)JagFan81 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 03:12 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Don't kid yourself, the NFL is getting the results it wants.
Oh I know. All these new rules are such subjective calls, not a clear foul/not a foul, they make these grey areas that allow them to make bad calls and we study the review to justify it. So many calls bailing teams out, have another go.
It was all intentional to keep the big dogs on top. When you have objectivity in the calls, you give a chance for smaller teams to take away market share. Can't have that.
(12-02-2018, 03:16 PM)lastonealive Wrote: [ -> ]So 3 points a half is acceptable?
Bortles was ten times better v the colts 3 weeks back when the D gave up a bunch early.
Sorry dude but Blake had like 3 games where we put up zip in the first half.
We are actually winning here!
Ramsey taking plays off again.
(12-02-2018, 03:18 PM)JaguarJosh05 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 03:16 PM)lastonealive Wrote: [ -> ]So 3 points a half is acceptable?
Bortles was ten times better v the colts 3 weeks back when the D gave up a bunch early.
Nice try.
It's starting to get awkward.
(12-02-2018, 03:16 PM)Jaguar Warrior Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 03:14 PM)lastonealive Wrote: [ -> ]So Bortles haters. Was he playing so bad now?
Why does it matter? You would rather stick with garbage rather than at least try and change something up, even if the result has the potential of being the same? You have to take a chance, bro.
It's just funny how adamant some folks were that everything, literally everything, was because of the QB. Yes, it's fine that they made the switch, but it's obvious that more is wrong this season than just the QB.
That was a nice catch by hilton.
Harrison needs to get that.
harrison has to make the int
Coverage sack right there.
(12-02-2018, 03:22 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]Nice fight by Ngakoue.
That's one guy that hasn't given up!
Smith tackling like someone trashed his car before the game
Good job D
Really liking Harrison other than dumb dumb
Hopefully the D didnt use all its energy in that half
colts 4 qtrs with 0 points vs Jags. wooot woot!!
Defense playing excellently.
(12-02-2018, 03:18 PM)Jaguar Warrior Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2018, 03:15 PM)JagFan81 Wrote: [ -> ]Oh I know. All these new rules are such subjective calls, not a clear foul/not a foul, they make these grey areas that allow them to make bad calls and we study the review to justify it. So many calls bailing teams out, have another go.
It was all intentional to keep the big dogs on top. When you have objectivity in the calls, you give a chance for smaller teams to take away market share. Can't have that.
Exactly. It's like how we are told refs will usually stick with the call on the field but that can be very flexible. Yet when we review teams like the Pats it's like a forensic test examining every possible angle to show the one that favors the Pats. Plus the big teams usually get the benefit of the majority of calls.
T4elin is having a beast day today.