Quote:Most certainly is.
no it isn't
Sputnik reported it in error, Trump repeated it. that's literally all that happened. This guy from Newsweek said its proof that Wikileaks is compromised is an outright lie.
Quote:no it isn't
Sputnik reported it in error, Trump repeated it. that's literally all that happened. This guy from Newsweek said its proof that Wikileaks is compromised is an outright lie.
Negative. If you want to play it like that your article is an outright lie.
it's just more of the same nonsense from the Clinton campaign that anything Wikileaks says is from Russia, SO BE SCARED OF IT
meanwhile Wikileaks is providing REAL insight into the corruption of our government. Ya man, believe Hillary and her lap dogs.
Quote:Negative. If you want to play it like that your article is an outright lie.
you mean play it like laying out the actual FACTS and not baseless accusations. you failed to even explain the article you posted. all you did was repeat the headlines and tweets that are beyond misleading.
Quote:it's just more of the same nonsense from the Clinton campaign that anything Wikileaks says is from Russia, SO BE SCARED OF IT
meanwhile Wikileaks is providing REAL insight into the corruption of our government. Ya man, believe Hillary and her lap dogs.
Wikileaks hasn't produced anything worthwhile in years. It's all noise and pointless. Good for the Alex Jones crazyfest.
Quote:you mean play it like laying out the actual FACTS and not baseless accusations. you failed to even explain the article you posted. all you did was repeat the headlines and tweets that are beyond misleading.
Stop
There were more facts in E's article than yours.
Quote:Wikileaks hasn't produced anything worthwhile in years. It's all noise and pointless. Good for the Alex Jones crazyfest.
are you a [BAD WORD REMOVED] idiot? the way they exposed the conspiracy against Bernie by Wasserman Shultz was a big revelation... the hell is wrong with you?
Quote:are you a [BAD WORD REMOVED] idiot? the way they exposed the conspiracy against Bernie by Wasserman Shultz was a big revelation... the hell is wrong with you?
No
Primaries aren't a democratic process. He could have run if he wanted to. Teddy R did it.
Quote:Wikileaks hasn't produced anything worthwhile in years. It's all noise and pointless. Good for the Alex Jones crazyfest.
Stop
There were more facts in E's article than yours.
Wrong. You have posted 0 facts.
You can see the Wikileaks email here:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2038
Sputnik mistook the words as Bloomenthal's. It's plainly obvious that is what happened. To suggest this means Russia tampered with Wikileaks or had any involvement with it is nonsense. If it isn't nonsense, please briefly explain how that proves anything.
Quote:No
Primaries aren't a democratic process. He could have run if he wanted to. Teddy R did it.
lol you sound like the scum sucking delegates who think they own this country
Quote:Wrong. You have posted 0 facts.
You can see the Wikileaks email here: <a class="bbc_url" href='https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2038'>https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2038</a>
Sputnik mistook the words as Bloomenthal's. It's plainly obvious that is what happened. To suggest this means Russia tampered with Wikileaks or had any involvement with it is nonsense. If it isn't nonsense, please briefly explain how that proves anything.
That's not the claim. Tampering with WikiLeaks. The claim is tampering with United States election process.
Quote:lol you sound like the scum sucking delegates who think they own this country
I'm sorry that you were unaware of how the primary process works.
Quote:That's not the claim. Tampering with WikiLeaks. The claim is tampering with United States election process.
you obviously didn't read the tweets made by Eichenwald (the author of the Newsweek article), he did claim Wikileaks is compromised
it's not tampering. Sputnik reported it in error and Trump repeated the article. It was misinformation, but that doesn't prove actual tampering. It proves incompetent journalism maybe, but that kind of thing is done by our USA homegrown journalists EVERY DAY
Quote:That's not the claim. Tampering with WikiLeaks. The claim is tampering with United States election process.
I'm sorry that you were unaware of how the primary process works.
no dont be sorry for me. i actually stand up for rights of the people. i dont bow down like a [BLEEP]
Quote:you obviously didn't read the tweets made by Eichenwald (the author of the Newsweek article), he did claim Wikileaks is compromised
it's not tampering. Sputnik reported it in error and Trump repeated the article. It was misinformation, but that doesn't prove actual tampering. It proves incompetent journalism maybe, but that kind of thing is done by our USA homegrown journalists EVERY DAY
Not going to agree. Thankfully one candidate is close to polling 50.
Quote:no dont be sorry for me. i actually stand up for rights of the people. i dont bow down like a [BAD WORD REMOVED]
Give me a break. Primaries have always been about who the party puts forth. People decide the President. But the party decides who they put up. Republicans wish they did a better job of working against Trump.
THANKFULLY because it will be heaven on Earth when the witch takes power
Quote:THANKFULLY because it will be heaven on Earth when the witch takes power
Maybe the R party will get their stuff together in 2020 and not allow a side show. The only guy in the world who couldn't beat Hillary!
Quote:Maybe the R party will get their stuff together in 2020 and not allow a side show. The only guy in the world who couldn't beat Hillary!
not surprised at your naivety. Hillary and her goons (like the author you posted) would find plenty of dirt on anybody and you would have ate it up like a good dog.
hey guys, the author didn't say this when he said this:
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Helvetica, Roboto, 'Segoe UI', Calibri, sans-serif;color:rgb(28,32,34);">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
Follow</div>
![[Image: IMG_0038b_normal.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/2193807582/IMG_0038b_normal.jpg)
Kurt Eichenwald
<div>
<span>✔</span>@kurteichenwald</div>
</div>
Anyone who doubts wikileaks is working w/ Putin: read how my words falsely became those of a Clinton confidante.
http://www.newsweek.com/vladimir-putin-sidney-blumenthal-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-benghazi-sputnik-508635 …
<div style="font-size:14px;color:rgb(105,120,130);">
7:52 PM - 10 Oct 2016
<div>
<div style="color:inherit;">
<div>
<div style="background-color:rgb(225,232,237);">
<div>
<div>
![[Image: proxy.jpg?t=HBhgaHR0cDovL3MubmV3c3dlZWsu...rrrv0CB4Oc]](https://o.twimg.com/2/proxy.jpg?t=HBhgaHR0cDovL3MubmV3c3dlZWsuY29tL3NpdGVzL3d3dy5uZXdzd2Vlay5jb20vZmlsZXMvc3R5bGVzL2Z1bGwvcHVibGljLzIwMTYvMTAvMTAvdHJ1bXAtcHV0aW4uanBnFMAWFOILHBSEBhSUAwAAFgASAA&s=2yOBAyXW-Z1ZMwM0CdTJDBt1BZeu_wzKyrrrv0CB4Oc)
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
From The Intercept: "To call all this overwrought deceit is to understate the case. In particular, the repeated claim that his story has anything to do with, let alone demonstrates, that “wikileaks is working w/Putin” or “wikileaks is compromised” is an outright fraud."
Quote:Wow. That is really something.
"This is not funny. It is terrifying. The Russians engage in a sloppy disinformation effort and, before the day is out, the Republican nominee for president is standing on a stage reciting the manufactured story as truth. How did this happen? Who in the Trump campaign was feeding him falsehoods straight from the Kremlin? (The Trump campaign did not respond to a request for comment.)"
Makes you wonder, is there a Russian mole high up in the Trump campaign?
or it just means Trump's people pulled an article from the internet thinking it was accurate and it turned out to be wrong
the idea that Sputnik was misleading on purpose and had it sent straight to Trump to repeat is pretty unlikely. if they knew it was misinformation, they should have known that it would only take a hour at least before somebody noticed the mistake.