Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Vegans Are Angry That Hyundai Made Fun Of 'Beet Loaf' During The Super Bowl

Vegans are rather miffed that they became the butt of a Super Bowl joke Sunday night, and they're taking it out on Korean carmaker, Hyundai.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/43070/veg...aign=cnews

Who cares? They need to know, "Beet Loaf" is a crime against nature.

(02-05-2019, 05:48 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]Who cares? They need to know, "Beet Loaf" is a crime against nature.

As is tofurkey, tofu burgers, and everything else where veggies "replace" meat.

ToFu, sounds like some sort of foot fungus..........

No they're not. A few Twitter accounts with a few thousand followers are angry. Just like people getting angry over red Starbucks cups turned out to be a guy who posted a video on Twitter. Stopping buying into this pandering [BLEEP] from supposed "news" sites.

(02-05-2019, 05:57 PM)DragonFury Wrote: [ -> ]No they're not. A few Twitter accounts with a few thousand followers are angry. Just like people getting angry over red Starbucks cups turned out to be a guy who posted a video on Twitter. Stopping buying into this pandering [BLEEP] from supposed "news" sites.

It didn’t say every single one of them were angry, just that vegans are. A few thousand vegans are in fact, vegans being angry about it.

(02-05-2019, 06:05 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-05-2019, 05:57 PM)DragonFury Wrote: [ -> ]No they're not. A few Twitter accounts with a few thousand followers are angry. Just like people getting angry over red Starbucks cups turned out to be a guy who posted a video on Twitter. Stopping buying into this pandering [BLEEP] from supposed "news" sites.

It didn’t say every single one of them were angry, just that vegans are. A few thousand vegans are in fact, vegans being angry about it.

Semantics, it's a tiny portion of the population even if everyone single of those people agreed with the statement made. 

But it's part of a much larger issue of purported news sites pretending entire groups are up in arms about some kind of trivial issue so they can pander to whatever group of people doesn't like the first group. It's not even lazy journalism, it's literally making [BLEEP] up about people getting unreasonably so they can get other people unreasonably upset in the hope of driving a few more clicks to their own website.

(02-05-2019, 06:25 PM)DragonFury Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-05-2019, 06:05 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ]It didn’t say every single one of them were angry, just that vegans are. A few thousand vegans are in fact, vegans being angry about it.

Semantics, it's a tiny portion of the population even if everyone single of those people agreed with the statement made. 

But it's part of a much larger issue of purported news sites pretending entire groups are up in arms about some kind of trivial issue so they can pander to whatever group of people doesn't like the first group. It's not even lazy journalism, it's literally making [BLEEP] up about people getting unreasonably so they can get other people unreasonably upset in the hope of driving a few more clicks to their own website.

Don't be angry.

(02-05-2019, 05:57 PM)DragonFury Wrote: [ -> ]No they're not. A few Twitter accounts with a few thousand followers are angry. Just like people getting angry over red Starbucks cups turned out to be a guy who posted a video on Twitter. Stopping buying into this pandering [BLEEP] from supposed "news" sites.

But that equates to 0.0571% of the 3.5 million vegan population so I think that substantiates generalizing the entire population; kind of like seeing posts and video clips of the US Neo-Nazi (skin heads) in the US and subsequently generalizing that Americans are Neo-Nazis.  Is that no true since I didn't say All Americans?  Sure, it's a total misrepresentation but apparently that's ok when Drifter repeatedly does it here.

.... Thank God Drifter is feeling good again.  At the end of the day, this is my escape from (constant) work so we need Drifters, Strowdcrowds, Beach Bunnies, 1Adam12s, and everyone else that posts here on this board

(02-05-2019, 07:48 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-05-2019, 06:25 PM)DragonFury Wrote: [ -> ]Semantics, it's a tiny portion of the population even if everyone single of those people agreed with the statement made. 

But it's part of a much larger issue of purported news sites pretending entire groups are up in arms about some kind of trivial issue so they can pander to whatever group of people doesn't like the first group. It's not even lazy journalism, it's literally making [BLEEP] up about people getting unreasonably so they can get other people unreasonably upset in the hope of driving a few more clicks to their own website.

Don't be angry.

I think we found the vegan!

A little off the beaten path but that just reminded me of the good ole days when we were looking for the Pope in the Pizza -- back when SNL was good




.

(02-05-2019, 11:00 PM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: [ -> ]A little off the beaten path but that just reminded me of the good ole days when we were looking for the Pope in the Pizza -- back when SNL was good




.

Father Guido Sarducci. SNL had a couple of runs in the 80s and 90s when it was funny. Comedy ain’t what it used to be.

If I wasn't allowed to eat meat again, I would be angry too.

I read an article earlier today about Vegans being angry about some message board topic. I think what we have learned here is … Eat meat, be less angry.

Ain't never once seen a human stuffing their piehole with some bacon that was angry. Guarantee!!!.

Bacon? ... I feel better now. Thank you.

(02-05-2019, 06:25 PM)DragonFury Wrote: [ -> ]

(02-05-2019, 06:05 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ]It didn’t say every single one of them were angry, just that vegans are. A few thousand vegans are in fact, vegans being angry about it.

Semantics, it's a tiny portion of the population even if everyone single of those people agreed with the statement made. 

But it's part of a much larger issue of purported news sites pretending entire groups are up in arms about some kind of trivial issue so they can pander to whatever group of people doesn't like the first group. It's not even lazy journalism, it's literally making [BLEEP] up about people getting unreasonably so they can get other people unreasonably upset in the hope of driving a few more clicks to their own website.

True.