(03-18-2019, 03:43 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ] (03-18-2019, 03:40 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Just another example of RJ having zero clue what he is talking about. LMS was an extremely highly rated show for ABC, and they caved to the mob.
Also, Brooklyn 99 was a great show when on Fox and when NBC got hold of it, it is barely recognizable anymore with its left leaning political views.
Hahahaha this is such an exaggeration.
The show was funny on Fox and it's still funny on NBC.
Yeah, the #metoo episode a couple weeks ago was freaking hilarious!
(03-18-2019, 03:44 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-18-2019, 03:43 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]Hahahaha this is such an exaggeration.
The show was funny on Fox and it's still funny on NBC.
Yeah, the #metoo episode a couple weeks ago was freaking hilarious!
I guess you must have missed the racial profiling episode back in 2017 when it was still airing on Fox.....
What the hell? I could have sworn I posted in regards to donors in the democratic party. I had links and everything. Oh well. We've moved on to Brooklyn 99.
(03-17-2019, 05:14 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (03-17-2019, 03:48 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Without the votes of children, felons, illegals, the deceased, and morons the Dems have no base.
You listed five groups as voting but only two of them actually vote in significant numbers.
you should be careful not to get your facts wrong like this, or else others might put you in the last category there.
Chrildren:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2...201283002/
Illegals:
https://www.star-telegram.com/news/state...94315.html
Not illegals, but illegal:
https://www.star-telegram.com/news/local...20740.html
The Dearly Departed:
https://nypost.com/2017/07/14/the-vote-f...se-to-see/
Gee, they even complimented you here Mike!
"Craftier liberals have inched away from the baseless 'Vote fraud = Loch Ness Monster' argument. Now, some claim, vote fraud is not “widespread.”
Nice to see you getting some credit for your denialism.
But, hey, "my" facts aren't worth a damn.
(03-19-2019, 12:08 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (03-17-2019, 05:14 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]You listed five groups as voting but only two of them actually vote in significant numbers.
you should be careful not to get your facts wrong like this, or else others might put you in the last category there.
Chrildren: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2...201283002/
Illegals: https://www.star-telegram.com/news/state...94315.html
Not illegals, but illegal: https://www.star-telegram.com/news/local...20740.html
The Dearly Departed: https://nypost.com/2017/07/14/the-vote-f...se-to-see/
Gee, they even complimented you here Mike!
"Craftier liberals have inched away from the baseless 'Vote fraud = Loch Ness Monster' argument. Now, some claim, vote fraud is not “widespread.”
Nice to see you getting some credit for your denialism.
But, hey, "my" facts aren't worth a damn.
You did not just post an editorial calling for 16 year olds to be allowed to vote as evidence for 16 year olds actually voting already
You couldn't have, because you're smarter than that. Right?
(03-19-2019, 12:30 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (03-19-2019, 12:08 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Chrildren: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2...201283002/
Illegals: https://www.star-telegram.com/news/state...94315.html
Not illegals, but illegal: https://www.star-telegram.com/news/local...20740.html
The Dearly Departed: https://nypost.com/2017/07/14/the-vote-f...se-to-see/
Gee, they even complimented you here Mike!
"Craftier liberals have inched away from the baseless 'Vote fraud = Loch Ness Monster' argument. Now, some claim, vote fraud is not “widespread.”
Nice to see you getting some credit for your denialism.
But, hey, "my" facts aren't worth a damn.
You did not just post an editorial calling for 16 year olds to be allowed to vote as evidence for 16 year olds actually voting already
You couldn't have, because you're smarter than that. Right?
You do realize that I never said they did vote, yet, except in illegal situations. Adding to the Dem base is why the topic is even under discussion, the same reason they want felons to vote, borders open, and no ID at polling stations. But it is nice to see you've given up all that pretense of being Conservative with another reflexive and thoughtless leap to defend the Helpless Left.
(03-19-2019, 08:32 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (03-19-2019, 12:30 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]You did not just post an editorial calling for 16 year olds to be allowed to vote as evidence for 16 year olds actually voting already
You couldn't have, because you're smarter than that. Right?
You do realize that I never said they did vote, yet, except in illegal situations. Adding to the Dem base is why the topic is even under discussion, the same reason they want felons to vote, borders open, and no ID at polling stations. But it is nice to see you've given up all that pretense of being Conservative with another reflexive and thoughtless leap to defend the Helpless Left.
On Tucker the other night, he kept pressing a guest if he would be ok with a 16 year old owning a fire arm since he thinks they should be able to vote. Finally, the guy said he wouldn't be ok with it unless they knew how to use them.
I look at voting the same way. 99% of 16 years don't understand what they are voting for, so technically don't know "how to vote".
Lowering the voting age to 16 would take what you are seeing in these far left loony colleges and move that to high school. It would be devastating for our already lacking education system.
(03-19-2019, 08:32 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (03-19-2019, 12:30 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]You did not just post an editorial calling for 16 year olds to be allowed to vote as evidence for 16 year olds actually voting already
You couldn't have, because you're smarter than that. Right?
You do realize that I never said they did vote, yet, except in illegal situations. Adding to the Dem base is why the topic is even under discussion, the same reason they want felons to vote, borders open, and no ID at polling stations. But it is nice to see you've given up all that pretense of being Conservative with another reflexive and thoughtless leap to defend the Helpless Left.
You said "without minors, democrats would have no base."
Simplest interpretation is you mean minors already vote in significant numbers.
I've gotten used to you twisting my words, but twisting your own is a new low.
(03-20-2019, 08:33 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (03-19-2019, 08:32 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]You do realize that I never said they did vote, yet, except in illegal situations. Adding to the Dem base is why the topic is even under discussion, the same reason they want felons to vote, borders open, and no ID at polling stations. But it is nice to see you've given up all that pretense of being Conservative with another reflexive and thoughtless leap to defend the Helpless Left.
You said "without minors, democrats would have no base."
Simplest interpretation is you mean minors already vote in significant numbers.
I've gotten used to you twisting my words, but twisting your own is a new low.
Lol, sorry you can't English.