(03-23-2019, 10:15 PM)surfon Wrote: [ -> ]So the phins can trade tannehill for mult picks and we couldn't get anything for bortles.
1. Tannehill did not have as bad of a reputation as Bortles did.
2. We DID manage to get a 6th round pick out of Gabbert...so perhaps things balanced out.
(03-23-2019, 10:15 PM)surfon Wrote: [ -> ]So the phins can trade tannehill for mult picks and we couldn't get anything for bortles.
The Phins ate part of the contract
(03-23-2019, 11:18 PM)JackCity Wrote: [ -> ] (03-23-2019, 10:15 PM)surfon Wrote: [ -> ]So the phins can trade tannehill for mult picks and we couldn't get anything for bortles.
The Phins ate part of the contract
Bet that tasted good. Aren't we taking a big cap hit for bottles? Guess I don't get the diff.
(03-25-2019, 01:48 PM)surfon Wrote: [ -> ] (03-23-2019, 11:18 PM)JackCity Wrote: [ -> ]The Phins ate part of the contract
Bet that tasted good. Aren't we taking a big cap hit for bottles? Guess I don't get the diff.
Tannehill is quite a bit better than Bortles, and actually costs a bit less. His problems is injuries, otherwise Tannehill is a perfectly average starting QB. Bortles is a borderline starter at best, at this point. Also Tannehill is a lot more accurate than Bortles (mid sixties vs high fifties).