Quote:This forum is making me lose faith in my country and humanity in general.
Take a hot shower. And then wrap a hot towel around your head.
Not sure what is more sad. The way the DNC/HRC totally screwed Bernie and are taking advantage of his supporters, or the fact they take the beatings like loyal little slaves.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5423
"So here's my idea. Bernie and his people have been [BAD WORD REMOVED] about super delegates and the huge percentage that have come out for Hillary. Since the original idea was to bring our elected officials to the convention ex-officio >> ( because of the offices and the constituencies they represent), why not throw Bernie a bone and reduce the super delegates in the future to the original draft of members of the House and Senate, governors and big city mayors, eliminating the DNC members who are not State chairs or vice-Chairs.
So if we "give" Bernie this in the Convention's rules committee, his people will think they've "won" something from the Party Establishment. And it functionally doesn't make any difference anyway. They win. We don't lose. Everyone is happy."
Quote:Not sure what is more sad. The way the DNC/HRC totally screwed Bernie and are taking advantage of his supporters, or the fact they take the beatings like loyal little slaves.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5423
"So here's my idea. Bernie and his people have been [BAD WORD REMOVED] about super delegates and the huge percentage that have come out for Hillary. Since the original idea was to bring our elected officials to the convention ex-officio >> ( because of the offices and the constituencies they represent), why not throw Bernie a bone and reduce the super delegates in the future to the original draft of members of the House and Senate, governors and big city mayors, eliminating the DNC members who are not State chairs or vice-Chairs.
So if we "give" Bernie this in the Convention's rules committee, his people will think they've "won" something from the Party Establishment. And it functionally doesn't make any difference anyway. They win. We don't lose. Everyone is happy."
You realize the rules for super-delegates have been around for a while...
So they knew they were gonna screw Bernie by going Back to the Future??? I mean, did they have to steal the plutonium from the Lybians??? Wait a second!! Doc got the plutonium from Lybia. Bengazi is in Libyia!! Doc is Bill Clinton from the future!!! OMG! It's all making sense now! Thanks JW!!!!!
Quote:Not sure what is more sad. The way the DNC/HRC totally screwed Bernie and are taking advantage of his supporters, or the fact they take the beatings like loyal little slaves.
<a class="bbc_url" href='https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5423'>https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5423</a>
"So here's my idea. Bernie and his people have been [BAD WORD REMOVED] about super delegates and the huge percentage that have come out for Hillary. Since the original idea was to bring our elected officials to the convention ex-officio >> ( because of the offices and the constituencies they represent), why not throw Bernie a bone and reduce the super delegates in the future to the original draft of members of the House and Senate, governors and big city mayors, eliminating the DNC members who are not State chairs or vice-Chairs.
So if we "give" Bernie this in the Convention's rules committee, his people will think they've "won" something from the Party Establishment. And it functionally doesn't make any difference anyway. They win. We don't lose. Everyone is happy."
What does Hillary have to do with this? Can we stay on topic it's Hillary Clinton running for president.
I'm still amazed that there are people who claimed to be amazed that the DNC would support the Democratic candidate.
Shocking! It's as if some people are being introduced to politics for the first time.
guys this is how things work. the party chooses the candidate before the votes come in. the votes of the people are meaningless. DUH, this is normal and wonderful
Quote:I'm still amazed that there are people who claimed to be amazed that the DNC would support the Democratic candidate.
Shocking! It's as if some people are being introduced to politics for the first time.
CNN said they didn't give anyone the questions in advance, so how did Donna Brazile get them? Also, Bernie was running for the Democrat candidacy under the DNC, was he not? How is it fair that the DNC is slipping the HRC campaign the questions, but not Bernie as well?
Quote:guys this is how things work. the party chooses the candidate before the votes come in. the votes of the people are meaningless. DUH, this is normal and wonderful
Quote:guys this is how things work. the party chooses the candidate before the votes come in. the votes of the people are meaningless. DUH, this is normal and wonderful
Clinton didn't get the most votes? And don't tell me you didn't want Clinton to win. Of course you did, as she's a weaker candidate vs. your boy.
And Trumps still going to lose.
Quote:CNN said they didn't give anyone the questions in advance, so how did Donna Brazile get them? Also, Bernie was running for the Democrat candidacy under the DNC, was he not? How is it fair that the DNC is slipping the HRC campaign the questions, but not Bernie as well?
It was a co-production. She got the question (only one that I'm aware of) from the other guy, not CNN.
I'm sure that one question put Clinton over the top and changed the course of history.
I'm sure Sean Hannity is working real hard to get Chris Wallace to slip him a question or two so he can pass them along to Trump.
Like that would matter.
The Question Brazille asked was not for the debate. Sanders campaign confirmed that they got similar questions:
http://www.nbcnews.com/card/top-sanders-...sy-n664831
Quote:
Tad Devine, who served as the top strategist on Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign, came the defense of Democratic National Committee Chair Donna Brazile Tuesday after hacked emails showed what some read as improper coordination between Brazile and the Clinton campaign.
<p style="font-family
roximaNovaRegular, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:16px;">Brazile said the question in the email was for a normal upcoming appearance on CNN and said she would regularly contact both campaigns for guidance.
<p style="font-familyroximaNovaRegular, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:16px;">"Yes that is absolutely true," Devine said of Brazile's account of the matter in an email to NBC News. "She would get in touch all the time for guidance, so I can verify her recollection on this issue."
lol...defending the liars and cheaters. This board is amazing.
Quote:lol...defending the liars and cheaters. This board is amazing.
If we didn't we couldn't support either candidate!
Quote:Clinton didn't get the most votes? And don't tell me you didn't want Clinton to win. Of course you did, as she's a weaker candidate vs. your boy.
And Trumps still going to lose.
i will tell you 100% i would love Bernie to be the D candidate
Quote:lol...defending the liars and cheaters. This board is amazing.
Quote:lol...defending the liars and cheaters. This board is amazing.
Where did I say a word supporting Donald Trump?
Quote:The Question Brazille asked was not for the debate. Sanders campaign confirmed that they got similar questions:
http://www.nbcnews.com/card/top-sanders-...sy-n664831
How dare you ruin the fanstasy of the trumpettes?!?!?!? They must be allowed to believe!!!
Seriously, it's NBC news. Unless it comes from infowars or some other "real news outlet" it doesn't count.
Quote:Meh...
What exactly do you want? You remind me of Frank the tank. You want to go streaking, but you're on an island.
You continue to build a straw man with posters here. There is maybe one hard core Hillary supporter. The rest of us are voting against trump.
So these wiki leaks are nothing new to anyone that has followed politics for longer than just the Obama presidency.
Your outrage is built on a naivety that is not persuasive to any millennial older than 33.
Your just bringing up your points to the wrong audience...
Hey... Maybe Hillary was right? Maybe you do need to tailor your message to cater to your audience.
This attitude is part of the problem.
Quote:I'm still amazed that there are people who claimed to be amazed that the DNC would support the Democratic candidate.
Shocking! It's as if some people are being introduced to politics for the first time.
I think the lack of caring about any of this by a segment of the population is sad. Accusing people of corruption and having proof of it are two different things. It's when you have proof and still don't care that you are in trouble. Now we have half the population defending wrong doing because politics.
Quote:This attitude is part of the problem.
Pshhhh. What ever.
You're not even my real dad