Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

(06-26-2019, 10:22 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-26-2019, 10:16 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]This question is not as silly as it seems on its face, but what difference does it make?  

Is drug use and murder somehow less egregious an assault on locker room discipline for some coaches than others?

My point was those guys knew how to keep their teams under control regardless of what they did on their own time.  3. HOF coaches

If they knew how to keep their teams under control, how did they end of with those problems with some of their best players?

Were they in that much control, wouldn't they limit these off field problems to their worst players?  Would Parcells and Gibbs risk their best pass rushers?

Let's look at coaches that don't yet have a HOF busts in Canton-Jimmy Johnson and Barry Switzer.

While in Dallas, they had the notorious "White House."

WR Michael Irvin, RT Erik Williams, DT Leon Lett, and DB Clayton Holmes all had major off field issues arise, but those coaches won Super Bowls.  Did they have discipline problems or not?

The difference isn't the behavior or discipline.

The difference in the analysis are the results.

The difference in the results is the overall talent-maybe at one position-QB.

(07-09-2019, 01:31 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-26-2019, 10:22 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]My point was those guys knew how to keep their teams under control regardless of what they did on their own time.  3. HOF coaches

If they knew how to keep their teams under control, how did they end of with those problems with some of their best players?

Were they in that much control, wouldn't they limit these off field problems to their worst players?  Would Parcells and Gibbs risk their best pass rushers?

Let's look at coaches that don't yet have a HOF busts in Canton-Jimmy Johnson and Barry Switzer.

While in Dallas, they had the notorious "White House."

WR Michael Irvin, RT Erik Williams, DT Leon Lett, and DB Clayton Holmes all had major off field issues arise, but those coaches won Super Bowls.  Did they have discipline problems or not?

The difference isn't the behavior or discipline.

The difference in the analysis are the results.

The difference in the results is the overall talent-maybe at one position-QB.

Those coaches knew how to keep their players under control regardless of how many people they murdered on their own time. 

(07-10-2019, 10:57 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-09-2019, 01:31 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]If they knew how to keep their teams under control, how did they end of with those problems with some of their best players?

Were they in that much control, wouldn't they limit these off field problems to their worst players?  Would Parcells and Gibbs risk their best pass rushers?

Let's look at coaches that don't yet have a HOF busts in Canton-Jimmy Johnson and Barry Switzer.

While in Dallas, they had the notorious "White House."

WR Michael Irvin, RT Erik Williams, DT Leon Lett, and DB Clayton Holmes all had major off field issues arise, but those coaches won Super Bowls.  Did they have discipline problems or not?

The difference isn't the behavior or discipline.

The difference in the analysis are the results.

The difference in the results is the overall talent-maybe at one position-QB.

Those coaches knew how to keep their players under control regardless of how many people they murdered on their own time. 

Allegedly murdered....