Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Maybe the GOP has grown a set........

Gaetz Leads GOP Congressmen In Storming Impeachment Inquiry, Shutting It Down

Rep. Matt Gaetz and Rep. Steve Scalise lead a large group of Republican Congressmen in storming into Adam Schiff’s closed impeachment hearings and demanded that he “shut it down.” This happened Wednesday morning on Capitol Hill where Gaetz contended that the “Soviet-style” hearings were a travesty and that the American people deserved to see what is going on. The GOP was successful at shutting it down, and Schiff started to scream at them. Don’t miss this.

https://madworldnews.com/gaetz-storming-impeachment/

Nice of them to bring their phones into the SCIF during the publicity stunt.

(10-23-2019, 03:23 PM)Gabe Wrote: [ -> ]Nice of them to bring their phones into the SCIF during the publicity stunt.

If the Dems don't want to follow the rules then why should the Pubs?

(10-23-2019, 03:23 PM)Gabe Wrote: [ -> ]Nice of them to bring their phones into the SCIF during the publicity stunt.

The impeachment inquiry is a publicity stunt.

(10-23-2019, 03:30 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-23-2019, 03:23 PM)Gabe Wrote: [ -> ]Nice of them to bring their phones into the SCIF during the publicity stunt.

If the Dems don't want to follow the rules then why should the Pubs?

Like the Pubs also conducting the impeachment inquiry?

(10-23-2019, 03:34 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-23-2019, 03:23 PM)Gabe Wrote: [ -> ]Nice of them to bring their phones into the SCIF during the publicity stunt.

The impeachment inquiry is a publicity stunt.

No, it isn't.

The appropriate investigative House committees investigate, then the House votes whether or not to impeach - based on the results of the committees' investigation. That's how the inquiry works.

(10-23-2019, 03:36 PM)Gabe Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-23-2019, 03:30 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]If the Dems don't want to follow the rules then why should the Pubs?

Like the Pubs also conducting the impeachment inquiry?

Yes, if the Dems want to play the game of grandstanding then why shouldn't the Pubs play along?

(10-23-2019, 03:42 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-23-2019, 03:36 PM)Gabe Wrote: [ -> ]Like the Pubs also conducting the impeachment inquiry?

Yes, if the Dems want to play the game of grandstanding then why shouldn't the Pubs play along?

Were you upset with the process of how Nixon was being investigated?

(10-23-2019, 03:43 PM)Gabe Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-23-2019, 03:42 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Yes, if the Dems want to play the game of grandstanding then why shouldn't the Pubs play along?

Were you upset with the process of how Nixon was being investigated?

Yes. And Clinton and Andrew Johnson too!

(10-23-2019, 03:45 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-23-2019, 03:43 PM)Gabe Wrote: [ -> ]Were you upset with the process of how Nixon was being investigated?

Yes. And Clinton and Andrew Johnson too!

Well, we're not going to agree on this then.

(10-23-2019, 03:45 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-23-2019, 03:43 PM)Gabe Wrote: [ -> ]Were you upset with the process of how Nixon was being investigated?

Yes. And Clinton and Andrew Johnson too!

Watergate Sequence of Events 

1            Wiretapping of the Democratic Party's headquarters
2            Cover-up and its unraveling
2.1         Initial cover-up
2.2         Kidnapping of Martha Mitchell
2.3         Money trail
2.4         Role of the media
2.5         Scandal escalates
2.6         Senate Watergate hearings and revelation of the Watergate tapes
2.7         "Saturday Night Massacre"
2.8         Legal action against Nixon Administration members
2.9         Release of the transcripts
2.10       Supreme Court
2.11       Release of the tapes
3            Final investigations and resignation
3.1         "Smoking Gun" tape
3.2         Resignation

(10-23-2019, 03:23 PM)Gabe Wrote: [ -> ]Nice of them to bring their phones into the SCIF during the publicity stunt.

Funny that you mention a publicity stunt without mentioning the actual publicity stunt. 

Just another mikesez pretending to be impartial when anyone with a set of functioning eyes can see your disdain for the republican party oozing out of your pores.

Back on topic, good for guys like Gaetz, Jordan, and Nunes. They are the real heroes.

It will be interesting to see what the Pentagon and DOD has to say about the withholding of aid to Ukraine in exchange for political favors.

Allegedly.

(10-23-2019, 04:05 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-23-2019, 03:23 PM)Gabe Wrote: [ -> ]Nice of them to bring their phones into the SCIF during the publicity stunt.

Funny that you mention a publicity stunt without mentioning the actual publicity stunt. 

Just another mikesez pretending to be impartial when anyone with a set of functioning eyes can see your disdain for the republican party oozing out of your pores.

Back on topic, good for guys like Gaetz, Jordan, and Nunes. They are the real heroes.

Told you earlier dude. I spot political BS, I'm calling it out. 

Impeachment inquiries are house committee-led investigations. 

But Gaetz = Hero.

(10-23-2019, 04:14 PM)ferocious Wrote: [ -> ]It will be interesting to see what the Pentagon and DOD has to say about the withholding of aid to Ukraine in exchange for political favors.

Allegedly.

It will be about as interesting as reading a 15 page opening statement from a swamp creature with ties to the dirty dossier. I.e, not interesting at all.

(10-23-2019, 04:15 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-23-2019, 04:14 PM)ferocious Wrote: [ -> ]It will be interesting to see what the Pentagon and DOD has to say about the withholding of aid to Ukraine in exchange for political favors.

Allegedly.

It will be about as interesting as reading a 15 page opening statement from a Trump-appointed swamp creature with ties to the dirty dossier. I.e, not interesting at all.

Tell yourself whatever you need to discredit the guy.

(10-23-2019, 04:18 PM)Gabe Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-23-2019, 04:15 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]It will be about as interesting as reading a 15 page opening statement from a Trump-appointed swamp creature with ties to the dirty dossier. I.e, not interesting at all.

Tell yourself whatever you need to discredit the guy.

I think we all know who will come out on top of this one.

You refer to a Vietnam veteran and lifetime public servant as a swamp creature?
Surely there are conservative veterans who would object to this portrayal of this man.
It is shameful.

(10-23-2019, 04:23 PM)ferocious Wrote: [ -> ]You refer to a Vietnam veteran and lifetime public servant as a swamp creature?
Surely there are conservative veterans who would object to this portrayal of this man.
It is shameful.

You can be both a veteran and a swamp creature at the same time.

(10-23-2019, 04:31 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-23-2019, 04:23 PM)ferocious Wrote: [ -> ]You refer to a Vietnam veteran and lifetime public servant as a swamp creature?
Surely there are conservative veterans who would object to this portrayal of this man.
It is shameful.

You can be both a veteran and a swamp creature at the same time.

How is this man a swamp creature and, if so, why hasn't Trump drained him?