J...A...G...S.....jags jags jags!!!! 24-7 jags pull this one out... Honestly the score I'm pulling out of my [BLEEP]....but I think we win this one...
(10-26-2019, 03:07 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ] (10-26-2019, 10:08 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]Jags 24
Jets 20
Fournette runs for 112 yards and a TD
Chark has 147 yards receiving and a TD
Westbrook has 87 yards and a TD
Allen has 2 sacks, Ngakoue has 1, Campbell has 1 and Bryan and Smoot have a half sack each.
For the Jags fan in me, I hope you’re right about the score.
For my fantasy team, I hope you’re right about Chark and Fournette.
I have Chark on my team as well. I really need a win this week to stay tied for first in my division. Last week was bad.
(10-26-2019, 04:06 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ] (10-26-2019, 03:07 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]For the Jags fan in me, I hope you’re right about the score.
For my fantasy team, I hope you’re right about Chark and Fournette.
I have Chark on my team as well. I really need a win this week to stay tied for first in my division. Last week was bad.
One of the reasons I dislike fantasy football...lol....we won period!! That's a good thing.... sorry I'm old school....I root for a team and a win is a win and a lose is a lose...
(10-25-2019, 10:21 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ] (10-25-2019, 10:14 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]Ok, NYJ oline is far from world beaters. Jacob's will hurt a bit but the Williams loss wont affect the run. Their oline is going to have to beat our dline if they want to get some creases in the run game and find an alley. I'm not to concerned, I think our dline dominates
Being on your third Will LB, backup Sam LB, and missing your best DT vs the run doesn’t affect the run defense in your mind.
You are one optimistic fan.
Still waiting for your answer on Cole.
Cole got a TD and how about that run D? lol
(10-27-2019, 04:12 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ] (10-25-2019, 10:21 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]Being on your third Will LB, backup Sam LB, and missing your best DT vs the run doesn’t affect the run defense in your mind.
You are one optimistic fan.
Still waiting for your answer on Cole.
Cole got a TD and how about that run D? lol
So - you're still unable to answer a simple question. OK. Got it.
I've long been a Keelan Cole fan. Don't get it twisted.
I was trying to force you to think harder than just randomly hoping someone deep on the depth chart suddenly gets a bunch of snaps. Clearly I was too optimistic to imagine you'd figure that out.
(10-27-2019, 07:54 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ] (10-27-2019, 04:12 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]Cole got a TD and how about that run D? lol
So - you're still unable to answer a simple question. OK. Got it.
I've long been a Keelan Cole fan. Don't get it twisted.
I was trying to force you to think harder than just randomly hoping someone deep on the depth chart suddenly gets a bunch of snaps. Clearly I was too optimistic to imagine you'd figure that out.
Whats the question? Its not that hard, if a player is playing good you get him more snaps. Exactly what has happend with Cole over the last 2 weeks. Im sure it will continue into next week especially in the redzone.
(10-27-2019, 08:05 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ] (10-27-2019, 07:54 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]So - you're still unable to answer a simple question. OK. Got it.
I've long been a Keelan Cole fan. Don't get it twisted.
I was trying to force you to think harder than just randomly hoping someone deep on the depth chart suddenly gets a bunch of snaps. Clearly I was too optimistic to imagine you'd figure that out.
Whats the question? Its not that hard, if a player is playing good you get him more snaps. Exactly what has happend with Cole over the last 2 weeks. Im sure it will continue into next week especially in the redzone.
For the third time:
Who's snaps are you decreasing to get Cole on the field?
Westbrook, Conley or Chark?
Just so you're clear on why I'm asking you this -
The Jags use quite a bit of two TE and three TE sets in the run game and not many of 4 or 5 receiver sets. (unless they are forced to by score or down/distance)
Therefore, if you are asking them to give a player like Cole (who I really like BTW) more snaps, then they must do it by taking snaps from someone ahead of him on the depth chart. Who is that receiver you want dropping their snap count?
It's three guys. Choose one.
I can't believe this is so tough for you.
(10-27-2019, 08:13 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ] (10-27-2019, 08:05 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]Whats the question? Its not that hard, if a player is playing good you get him more snaps. Exactly what has happend with Cole over the last 2 weeks. Im sure it will continue into next week especially in the redzone.
For the third time:
Who's snaps are you decreasing to get Cole on the field?
Westbrook, Conley or Chark?
Just so you're clear on why I'm asking you this -
The Jags use quite a bit of two TE and three TE sets in the run game and not many of 4 or 5 receiver sets. (unless they are forced to by score or down/distance)
Therefore, if you are asking them to give a player like Cole (who I really like BTW) more snaps, then they must do it by taking snaps from someone ahead of him on the depth chart. Who is that receiver you want dropping their snap count?
It's three guys. Choose one.
I can't believe this is so tough for you.
Its not tough at all, I have already answered this. In the redzone i would put Cole in over Conley and Cole would be the guy I use to sub in for a breather. Could also use more 4 WR sets to get Cole more snaps like we seen today. Its not hard to find a guy more snaps if one is playing good. You dont have to bump a guy up on the depth chart to get him more snaps. Is it really that hard for you?
(10-27-2019, 08:20 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ] (10-27-2019, 08:13 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]For the third time:
Who's snaps are you decreasing to get Cole on the field?
Westbrook, Conley or Chark?
Just so you're clear on why I'm asking you this -
The Jags use quite a bit of two TE and three TE sets in the run game and not many of 4 or 5 receiver sets. (unless they are forced to by score or down/distance)
Therefore, if you are asking them to give a player like Cole (who I really like BTW) more snaps, then they must do it by taking snaps from someone ahead of him on the depth chart. Who is that receiver you want dropping their snap count?
It's three guys. Choose one.
I can't believe this is so tough for you.
Its not tough at all, I have already answered this. In the redzone i would put Cole in over Conley and Cole would be the guy I use to sub in for a breather. Could also use more 4 WR sets to get Cole more snaps like we seen today. Its not hard to find a guy more snaps if one is playing good. You dont have to bump a guy up on the depth chart to get him more snaps. Is it really that hard for you?
So your answer is Conley. Got it.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/ii7s8eIBuVMXr9excU/giphy.gif)
smh
(10-27-2019, 08:59 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ] (10-27-2019, 08:20 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]Its not tough at all, I have already answered this. In the redzone i would put Cole in over Conley and Cole would be the guy I use to sub in for a breather. Could also use more 4 WR sets to get Cole more snaps like we seen today. Its not hard to find a guy more snaps if one is playing good. You dont have to bump a guy up on the depth chart to get him more snaps. Is it really that hard for you?
So your answer is Conley. Got it.
smh
Close to the goaline yes I would play Cole over him. Cole has always had a knack for the endzone
Look at the jets fans on Allen vs Williams. Would yall trade a 1st for Williams to take over for Dareus? Jets are already wanting to trade him and they know their GM messed up passing on Allen too. I wasnt the biggest Williams fan although he had a monster season last year at Alabama. Pairing him with our dline though would be nasty
https://forums.jetnation.com/topic/14801...-williams/