Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Jaguarrior Mock Draft - top 4 teams
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
What will more than likely happen:

 

1. Garrett

2. Watson

3. Mahomes

4. Fournette/Thomas/Allen/Adams/Hooker/Lattimore/Howard in no particular order

 

All of these guys are good. This Draft is seriously loaded. In this scenario I think we come away with an awesome player regardless. I don't care about if we need the position or not. Players will get hurt, suspended or old. You can never anticipate what will happen. As long as they are talented and dependable, "Welcome to the team".

 

What I want to happen:

 

1. Garrett

2. Trubisky


3. Fournette


4. Watson, Mahomes


 

If Watson or Mahomes are there they should trade back for a package equal to last years top 2 picks. If not equal,
make the pick

. Both QB's are better than last years options going 1 and 2. All of us with eye's and a brain can see that. No one said last years QB crop was weak but it was. The best player went in the 4th round. My point, don't listen to media guy's. They're just lion tamers in a circus. They're saying this is a weak class for a reason. Trust me, you don't want to go into next season with Bortles and the aforementioned QB's or Kaep are our best options. we will regret passing on them if they're there.Even 2015 was garbage time for Bortles. Go back an watch the horror show objectively if you don't believe me. 


 

Honestly, I don't care if they start Bortles next year even after picking a QB at 4. If he's better and winning Awesome. We got ourselves a QB, a talented backup and trading leverage for the future. you can always recoup the value of the top pick if they don't get to play because Bortles is winning. But if he's not, then what are you left with? 

 

If this team wants to win they need to start making winning moves.

 

Quote: 

What I want to happen:

 

1. Garrett

2. Trubisky


3. Fournette


4. Watson, Mahomes


 
 

I have no idea what your flag logo is but I'm assuming meth is legal there based on your wish at #4
Quote:I have no idea what your flag logo is but I'm assuming meth is legal there based on your wish at #4
 

Meth isn't really apart of my demographic or culture. Here, have some more Kool-Aid bud.  :yes:
If it make all of you feel better. Draft Mitch. He will at least be a glimmer of hope when we stink it up yet another season.

Quote:If it make all of you feel better. Draft Mitch. He will at least be a glimmer of hope when we stink it up yet another season.
how will drafting Mitch make everyone feel better?  Dont think I have seen the first person say they want Trubisky

Just say NO to a QB at #4.

Quote:Just say NO to a RB at #4.
Fixed.
Quote:Just say NO to a QB at #4.
Then say YES to being below mediocre and just plan and simple Loserism. When you lose for this long for the same reason and no one wants change, you're in Cult territory dude.
Quote:Then say YES to being below mediocre and just plan and simple Loserism. When you lose for this long for the same reason and no one wants change, you're in Cult territory dude.
 

For the same reason? Drafting a QB is literally the same reason we are in this mess. Gabbert in 2011 and Bortles in 2014. Now it's 2017. See a pattern?
Quote:For the same reason? Drafting a QB is literally the same reason we are in this mess. Gabbert in 2011 and Bortles in 2014. Now it's 2017. See a pattern?
 

The sun doesn't rise on those on the left coast.  It sets on them.
Quote:The sun doesn't rise on those on the left coast.  It sets on them.
 

Profound  Wink
Quote:For the same reason? Drafting a QB is literally the same reason we are in this mess. Gabbert in 2011 and Bortles in 2014. Now it's 2017. See a pattern?
 

They're not good at drafting QB's?  Huh
Quote:For the same reason? Drafting a QB is literally the same reason we are in this mess. Gabbert in 2011 and Bortles in 2014. Now it's 2017. See a pattern?
My response is plainly this.  What vet are we losing then?   Because 18 mill for one year is not chump change.