Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Gameplan for Titans doesn’t need to change if the Chiefs score. Not yet.

chiefs have figured out the tacks it looks like

Whelp at least we don't have to endure the torture of tacks in the SB.

(01-19-2020, 06:19 PM)HandsomeRob86 Wrote: [ -> ]Whelp at least we don't have to endure the torture of tacks in the SB.

Which brings up the next question, are the tacks this year's 2017 Jaguars? Tannehill has never been as good as he was this year, and Derrick Henry is in a contract year, if they pay him his production probably goes down some next year. Maybe they franchise him?

(01-19-2020, 06:26 PM)SeldomRite Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-19-2020, 06:19 PM)HandsomeRob86 Wrote: [ -> ]Whelp at least we don't have to endure the torture of tacks in the SB.

Which brings up the next question, are the tacks this year's 2017 Jaguars? Tannehill has never been as good as he was this year, and Derrick Henry is in a contract year, if they pay him his production probably goes down some next year. Maybe they franchise him?

I was just thinking about this, I am really hoping they extend tannehill and Henry. He looks like Bortles out there.

---

But they have gone to the playoffs multiple times in the last couple of years tho. So not really like us.

Chiefs turning the screw here. The pound the ball, tough D scheme does work but when you have an elite QB on the other side, he can stop you playing that way and now it's on Tannehill making plays.

If they had won in NE, Baltimore and KC that would have been one of the greatest wildcard runs ever.

(01-19-2020, 06:32 PM)HandsomeRob86 Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-19-2020, 06:26 PM)SeldomRite Wrote: [ -> ]Which brings up the next question, are the tacks this year's 2017 Jaguars? Tannehill has never been as good as he was this year, and Derrick Henry is in a contract year, if they pay him his production probably goes down some next year. Maybe they franchise him?

I was just thinking about this, I am really hoping they extend tannehill and Henry. He looks like Bortles out there.

---

But they have gone to the playoffs multiple times in the last couple of years tho. So not really like us.

I think they're more talented on offense, but I can't help but think Tannehill regresses to the mean and Henry probably gets lazy if he gets paid.

Wait fisher is still on the chiefs. Man.
Wow, KC killed em

---

(01-19-2020, 06:35 PM)SeldomRite Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-19-2020, 06:32 PM)HandsomeRob86 Wrote: [ -> ]I was just thinking about this, I am really hoping they extend tannehill and Henry. He looks like Bortles out there.

---

But they have gone to the playoffs multiple times in the last couple of years tho. So not really like us.

I think they're more talented on offense, but I can't help but think Tannehill regresses to the mean and Henry probably gets lazy if he gets paid.

I think Tannehill will regress, not so certain on Henry, he doesn't stike me as the getting lazy type.

When the chiefs started playing goal line defense on the titans side of the field and the titans were still trying to run it anyway I realized the titans coaches still don't have faith in Tannehill.

Chiefs oline is amazing

KC is going to be the team to beat in the Superbowl IMO.

Titians are overrated just like the Ravens were. This up-coming SB will be the first one I will watch in quite sometime. Stop Henry and you have stopped the Titians. I'll sleep good tonight

Garbage time, perfect for an extension to keep tn mediocre

How do they call a penalty from a previous play? Seems pretty rigged lol. NFL definitely doesn’t want the TACKS in SB.

The refs cant help but screw it up can they.

(01-19-2020, 06:57 PM)The_Franchise_QB Wrote: [ -> ]How do they call a penalty from a previous play? Seems pretty rigged lol. NFL definitely doesn’t want the TACKS in SB.

All penalties are called for the previous play, are you okay?

Why do I feel like the tacks might get lucky.

They need 2 scores and 1 time out, they used all that lick back in 1999. All is well in the NFL.

There is a god!

got to admit that pi call for the chiefs was questionable.

---

lol tannehill, how fitting