Has nothing to do with numbers.
One could be an abuse of power, if the President's motive was to avoid himself or his family being charged with a crime.
Were any of Obama's given to someone who could testify against him?
The Drifter - getting it wrong since 1995!
(07-16-2020, 09:18 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Has nothing to do with numbers.
One could be an abuse of power, if the President's motive was to avoid himself or his family being charged with a crime.
bruh... Gaslighting aside. How can you type this?
He can't. Mikesez is the poster boy for gaslighting.
(07-21-2020, 12:11 AM)jj82284 Wrote: [ -> ] (07-16-2020, 09:18 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Has nothing to do with numbers.
One could be an abuse of power, if the President's motive was to avoid himself or his family being charged with a crime.
bruh... Gaslighting aside. How can you type this?
I don't know who you think I am.
If the President broke a law during the whole WikiLeaks affair, Roger Stone would have known about it.
Roger Stone's refusal to cooperate spoke volumes.
Trump's offer of clemency also speaks volumes.
If I can hear it, and you can't, sad for you I guess.
Gaslighting would be if there were multiple plausible explanations and I insisted on only one. So what other plausible explanation is there? How is all of this anything other than a cover-up on the part of Trump?
(07-21-2020, 07:42 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]He can't. Mikesez is the poster boy for gaslighting.
Childish.
(07-21-2020, 12:11 AM)jj82284 Wrote: [ -> ] (07-16-2020, 09:18 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Has nothing to do with numbers.
One could be an abuse of power, if the President's motive was to avoid himself or his family being charged with a crime.
bruh... Gaslighting aside. How can you type this?
Then snuff the gaslight, and show us which of Obama's pardons were to persons in a position to incriminate him.