(10-10-2020, 02:12 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2020, 01:42 PM)mal234 Wrote: [ -> ]I agree withflgatorsandjags that DJ could definitely be a top 10.receiver in this league. James Robinson is playing top 10 (and better) level at his position. And Josh Lambo when healthy is like the second best kicker in this league. Last year the only one you could maybe put over him is Justin Tucker.
The defense is rough but the offense has talent. The talent level on the offense is not horrible.
Robinson has played 4 games as an undrafted rookie and you have him in the Top 10 backs in the League? C'mon....
As for Chark, who are you taking off this list and putting him ahead of? Not ranked in any real order:
1. Michael Thomas
2. DeAndre Hopkins
3. Julio Jones
4. Chris Godwin
5. Tyreek Hill
6. DeVante Adams
7. Mike Evans
8. Amari Cooper
9. Courtland Sutton
10. AJ Brown
11. Tyler Lockett
12. Allen Robinson
13. DJ Moore
14. Keenan Allen
15. Odell Beckham Jr.
16. DeVante Parker
17. Kenny Golladay
18. Deebo Samuel
19. Stefon Diggs
20. Robert Woods
21. Terry McLaurin
22. DK Metcalf
23. Jarvis Landry
24. Cooper Kupp
25. Adam Thielen
26. AJ Green
27. Ty Hilton
28. JuJu Smith-Schuster
29. Will Fuller
30. Julian Edelman
31. Jerry Jeudy
32. Michael Gallup
33. Sammy Watkins
34. Larry Fitzgerald
35. Calvin Ridley
If you think he is better than 15 guys on this list (which is highly debatable), Chark is still not even Top 20. Nevermind Top 10. I'd have him in the 22-25 range.
Chark is currently ranked 45th in receiving yards, 40th in yards per catch, and 31st in yards per game. NOT Top 10, or even Top 20. Take off the Teal glasses, my friend.
If not ranked in any real order...I would put Chark above Fuller. Fuller has speed to burn, but he can't stay healthy.
I'd consider putting him above Fitzgerald and Green. Fitz and Green have been great, and there would be zero question if we were talking about them in their primes. But I'd say right now, Chark is more explosive than either of those guys. But Fitz could easily be "Professor receiver. In comparison to his knowledge of the position, Fitz could be a "professor."
."
I've never been a huge fan of Robert Woods Chark has better deep speed than Landry, though I would say Landry runs better routes.
First Quarter award for best home packed Lunch:
Dough Marrone
Bologna on Rye with Sour Cream and onion chips.
(10-10-2020, 09:18 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]If not ranked in any real order...I would put Chark above Fuller. Fuller has speed to burn, but he can't stay healthy.
I'd consider putting him above Fitzgerald and Green. Fitz and Green have been great, and there would be zero question if we were talking about them in their primes. But I'd say right now, Chark is more explosive than either of those guys. But Fitz could easily be "Professor receiver. In comparison to his knowledge of the position, Fitz could be a "professor."
."
I've never been a huge fan of Robert Woods Chark has better deep speed than Landry, though I would say Landry runs better routes.
So that is like 5 guys on this list you have him ahead of... that would put him at #30. I have him a little higher than you at about #23.
(10-10-2020, 09:22 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote: [ -> ] (10-10-2020, 09:18 PM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]If not ranked in any real order...I would put Chark above Fuller. Fuller has speed to burn, but he can't stay healthy.
I'd consider putting him above Fitzgerald and Green. Fitz and Green have been great, and there would be zero question if we were talking about them in their primes. But I'd say right now, Chark is more explosive than either of those guys. But Fitz could easily be "Professor receiver. In comparison to his knowledge of the position, Fitz could be a "professor."
."
I've never been a huge fan of Robert Woods Chark has better deep speed than Landry, though I would say Landry runs better routes.
So that is like 5 guys on this list you have him ahead of... that would put him at #30. I have him a little higher than you at about #23.
I'm not necessarily ranking him specifically at 30, just pointing out guys I would take Chark over. After further consideration, I think I would include him over TY Hilton. Hilton was amazing earlier in his career when he had Luck throwing him the ball. He was fast and quick...almost impossible to jam. But we've managed to do a good job on him over the past few years. In comparison, I think Chark can give you deep speed and more physicality than Hilton.
I agree with you he wouldn't be a top 10 WR right now no matter how you slice it. But I am happy with his development at receiver so far.
(10-10-2020, 09:20 PM)jaguarmvp Wrote: [ -> ]First Quarter award for best home packed Lunch:
Dough Marrone
Bologna on Rye with Sour Cream and onion chips.
Eh...Rye? Sour Cream and Onion?
Not sure about that. Questionable choices.
.gif "Laughing")
Chark is probably not quite a top 10 WR right now, but that's not really a knock on him WR is just absolutely loaded right now. He's a solid mid/low level WR1 though that's good enough for now.
(10-11-2020, 10:40 AM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]Chark is probably not quite a top 10 WR right now, but that's not really a knock on him WR is just absolutely loaded right now. He's a solid mid/low level WR1 though that's good enough for now.
He arguably is not a Top 20 receiver either. But like you said, it is not a knock against him. I think he's a good player and might be our best one on offense. I am just saying anyone who thinks he is a Pro Bowler this year is definitely living in Duval County and drinking the Teal Kool Aid. He is 41st in the League in receiving yards.