I thought initial x-rays were negative. is it a lisfran injury or not. Yall posting links about needing more surgery to see what's up since it was negative on game day. Wake me when yall talking about actual news and not speculation with no actual evidence being posted. yall getting like the NFL network host with this hot air and smoke
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
It sucks but thankfully we have James Robinson, a top 100 player. I also thank Tavon Austin will make the team and get a lot of touches this year. Possible have the best year of his career in this offense
(08-24-2021, 09:34 AM)JagsFansince1995 Wrote: [ -> ]I thought initial x-rays were negative. is it a lisfran injury or not. Yall posting links about needing more surgery to see what's up since it was negative on game day. Wake me when yall talking about actual news and not speculation with no actual evidence being posted. yall getting like the NFL network host with this hot air and smoke
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
"Jaguars RB Travis Etienne suffered Lisfranc injury vs. Saints, will undergo further tests"
https://www.nfl.com/_amp/jaguars-rb-trav...ther-tests
(08-24-2021, 09:36 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]It sucks but thankfully we have James Robinson, a top 100 player. I also thank Tavon Austin will make the team and get a lot of touches this year. Possible have the best year of his career in this offense
(08-24-2021, 09:34 AM)JagsFansince1995 Wrote: [ -> ]I thought initial x-rays were negative. is it a lisfran injury or not. Yall posting links about needing more surgery to see what's up since it was negative on game day. Wake me when yall talking about actual news and not speculation with no actual evidence being posted. yall getting like the NFL network host with this hot air and smoke
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
"Jaguars RB Travis Etienne suffered Lisfranc injury vs. Saints, will undergo further tests" https://www.nfl.com/_amp/jaguars-rb-trav...ther-tests
So Ian said it's a Lisfranc injury based on his thoughts but no actual evidence since no one has any definitive info. Just negative 1st test and more info after more test today. How is this news and not speculation. I'll trust his sources like yall I guess but I can spew whateva I think without test results as well.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
Etienne news is poopy, that's for sure. Even before I heard the diagnosis, just seeing headlines about foot injury I started to wonder if we might "redshirt" him this season via IR, and reassess next season how personnel and scheme overlap properly. (Are we power running, finesse, or somewhere in between?)
I figure this is good news for a guy like Austin. While he may not be able to run out of the backfield, I think his quickness and versatility on screens and underneath routes will get him on the final 53 now. If Etienne was full go, I think he ends up a tough cut. That said, I might give him a few carries in practice just to see what he offers if they haven't already, just to see if we have some flexibility with dealing with Etienne's recovery.
(08-24-2021, 10:40 AM)Mikey Wrote: [ -> ]Etienne news is poopy, that's for sure. Even before I heard the diagnosis, just seeing headlines about foot injury I started to wonder if we might "redshirt" him this season via IR, and reassess next season how personnel and scheme overlap properly. (Are we power running, finesse, or somewhere in between?)
I figure this is good news for a guy like Austin. While he may not be able to run out of the backfield, I think his quickness and versatility on screens and underneath routes will get him on the final 53 now. If Etienne was full go, I think he ends up a tough cut. That said, I might give him a few carries in practice just to see what he offers if they haven't already, just to see if we have some flexibility with dealing with Etienne's recovery.
This does open up a spot to bring someone back.
(08-24-2021, 11:49 PM)Tank Commander Wrote: [ -> ] (08-24-2021, 10:40 AM)Mikey Wrote: [ -> ]Etienne news is poopy, that's for sure. Even before I heard the diagnosis, just seeing headlines about foot injury I started to wonder if we might "redshirt" him this season via IR, and reassess next season how personnel and scheme overlap properly. (Are we power running, finesse, or somewhere in between?)
I figure this is good news for a guy like Austin. While he may not be able to run out of the backfield, I think his quickness and versatility on screens and underneath routes will get him on the final 53 now. If Etienne was full go, I think he ends up a tough cut. That said, I might give him a few carries in practice just to see what he offers if they haven't already, just to see if we have some flexibility with dealing with Etienne's recovery.
This does open up a spot to bring someone back.
Give it up, we aren't re-signing Him.
This is one fewer that gets cut to 53, not adding anyone at the bottom ten of the 90-man roster.