Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

There's some chatter on Twitter this morning between him and Alfie from BigCatCountry. Prisco says that he's hearing we're going quarterback at 4, so you can take that for what it's worth.

It's all lies and smoke screens. I highly doubt DC and TC would leak to the media who they're thinking about.

Quote:It's all lies and smoke screens. I highly doubt DC and TC would leak to the media who they're thinking about.

agree, they had Manziel signs up when we drafted Bortles to make teams think we were drafting Manziel

Yeah I also have a hard time believing we would go QB at 4, just figured I'd pass it on.

Not gonna happen

There has been some talk about a QB at #4 (mocks and analyst) and that is disturbing to think about.

Quote:There has been some talk about a QB at #4 (mocks and analyst) and that is disturbing to think about.

it's good really. If another team likes one of the QBs they might want to jump us to get him.

Part of me hopes that Dave and Tom asked Prisco to put that out there. That wouldn't surprise me.

Quote:Part of me hopes that Dave and Tom asked Prisco to put that out there. That wouldn't surprise me.

I good see that

Could

Prisco is just reporting what he is hearing. He'll be the first to tell you about the smokescreens this time of year. That being said, a QB is far more likely than RB at 4. lol

Trubiscuit over Watson if we do go QB. I sure hope we don't.

They gotta decide on that Bortles option soon. Does not surprise me at all that it's in consideration. They could trade Bortles to a number of teams for something relatively decent. 

Quote:Trubiscuit over Watson if we do go QB. I sure hope we don't.

 

 

Totally agree.


 

If we're going qb at #4 it's for Trubisky.


 

 

As an aside, there was a rumor about Blake being traded to Arizona. I'm not sure where that came from, but if there is anything to the qb at #4 rumor, than there might be more to this trade rumor as well.


 

At #4 it's gotta be Trubisky who can go anywhere from #1 to #10. Anyone else can be had in a trade down most likely.

Of course. I'm sure they'd love to trade down, and get someone to bite. Browns maybe...and still possibly get the RB they want.

Smoke, but no fire. It's just blowing.

Whatever Prisco is hearing is probably a smokescreen hoping someone will panic and start talking trade.

Quote:Whatever Prisco is hearing is probably a smokescreen hoping someone will panic and start talking trade.

 

 

This very well may be the case. A little interest in Trubisky right now might go a long ways. It could very well tempt the Bills or Browns to trade up.

Just to ponder the idea of what a Bills trade might look like. We'd basically be giving the #4 pick to the Bills for their #10, their #44 pick, and their #156 pick in round five. The Jaguars would then have the following picks...


 

1.10


2.35


2.44


3.68


4.110


5.148


5.156


6.187


7.222


7.240

At #10 we could get McCaffery, Howard, Foster or Mahomes.

Quote:Totally agree.


 

If we're going qb at #4 it's for Trubisky.


 

 

As an aside, there was a rumor about Blake being traded to Arizona. I'm not sure where that came from, but if there is anything to the qb at #4 rumor, than there might be more to this trade rumor as well.


 

At #4 it's gotta be Trubisky who can go anywhere from #1 to #10. Anyone else can be had in a trade down most likely.

Accept if ya look at bears.  They have had Watson in numorous times and shown zero interest in Mitch.  Plus Watson in mocks have been to 6 and 10.  So your hate with Watson is on par with mine of fournette. 

 

That should not be drafted at four or in top 10.

 

And don't get me wrong.  We both have legitimate reasons why.  So both could be 100% correct.