Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Agnew had receptins of 29, 24 and 14 for 5 catches 78 yards.. Does he need the ball more thoughts?. I believe he was the 3rd WR behind Jones and Shenault..

He's a better piece offensively than we thought he'd be.

Let's not expect him to be Jarvis Landry all of a sudden. Still a small sample.

(10-18-2021, 08:11 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]He's a better piece offensively than we thought he'd be.

Let's not expect him to be Jarvis Landry all of a sudden. Still a small sample.

Based on what he has done though, he seems like our best deep threat.

Crew got the color commentary right on him. Get him in space and he operates like a returner. Glad he is playing for us.

(10-18-2021, 09:55 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-18-2021, 08:11 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]He's a better piece offensively than we thought he'd be.

Let's not expect him to be Jarvis Landry all of a sudden. Still a small sample.

Based on what he has done though, he seems like our best deep threat.

Based on literally not making one play as a deep threat? I like him but, wut?

(10-18-2021, 10:29 PM)Jags32250 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-18-2021, 09:55 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]Based on what he has done though, he seems like our best deep threat.

Based on literally not making one play as a deep threat? I like him but, wut?

What do you consider deep? I consider anything over 20 yards a deep ball.

(10-18-2021, 10:18 PM)MoJagFan Wrote: [ -> ]Crew got the color commentary right on him. Get him in space and he operates like a returner. Glad he is playing for us.

Not sure why he hasn’t been target of more screens. If he has I just haven’t seen them.

His speed is his biggest weapon but whatever role we had in mind for Etienne this year, id like to see Agnew playing. His a solid weapon to use at WR and if you need a burner then hes your guy but not sure he can do the whole WR route tree to that high a standard yet.

If you can get him playing in the slot and get him matchups with LB's, hes winning that battle all day long.

Not to say he will be the same caliber, tyreek hill at one point was just a return guy.

I’d like to see him be our slot guy. He’s earned the opportunity.

(10-18-2021, 07:33 PM)chris hill Wrote: [ -> ]Agnew had receptins of 29, 24 and 14 for 5 catches 78 yards.. Does he need the ball more thoughts?. I believe he was the 3rd WR behind Jones and Shenault..

I hope he ends up fielding a lot of punts this season.

If we had a true number 1 WR that could draw double teams and attention it would help everyone. If we could make Adams the highest paid WR in history it would put this offense over the top with a healthy Etienne

(10-18-2021, 10:29 PM)Jags32250 Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-18-2021, 09:55 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]Based on what he has done though, he seems like our best deep threat.

Based on literally not making one play as a deep threat? I like him but, wut?

Based on the fact that the other WRs sure as hell aren't deep threats.  Kind of like being the skinniest person on The Biggest Loser.

(10-19-2021, 08:48 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]If we had a true number 1 WR that could draw double teams and attention it would help everyone. If we could make Adams the highest paid WR in history it would put this offense over the top with a healthy Etienne

We have the cap space, I think I’d be okay with letting Chark walk and backing up a truck to Adams

(10-19-2021, 10:45 AM)NoShoes Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2021, 08:48 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]If we had a true number 1 WR that could draw double teams and attention it would help everyone.  If we could make Adams the highest paid WR in history it would put this offense over the top with a healthy Etienne

We have the cap space, I think I’d be okay with letting Chark walk and backing up a truck to Adams

You think?

(10-19-2021, 10:59 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2021, 10:45 AM)NoShoes Wrote: [ -> ]We have the cap space, I think I’d be okay with letting Chark walk and backing up a truck to Adams

You think?

Yeah but I'm pretty much expecting Adams to stay with Rodgers in Green Bay. Or follow him wherever he ends up

(10-19-2021, 02:47 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2021, 10:59 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]You think?

Yeah but I'm pretty much expecting Adams to stay with Rodgers in Green Bay. Or follow him wherever he ends up

Most teams don't have the cap space to bring in Rodgers and Adams

(10-19-2021, 02:50 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2021, 02:47 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah but I'm pretty much expecting Adams to stay with Rodgers in Green Bay. Or follow him wherever he ends up

Most teams don't have the cap space to bring in Rodgers and Adams

I'm sure Aaron would be more than happy to take less money if it meant the team could afford to sign Adams.

(10-19-2021, 03:31 PM)scottyg Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2021, 02:50 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]Most teams don't have the cap space to bring in Rodgers and Adams

I'm sure Aaron would be more than happy to take less money if it meant the team could afford to sign Adams.

Since when has Rodgers ever done that?? Rodgers ain't Brady. Other than Brady what other QB takes less money to help out his team?

(10-19-2021, 02:50 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2021, 02:47 PM)Kane Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah but I'm pretty much expecting Adams to stay with Rodgers in Green Bay. Or follow him wherever he ends up

Most teams don't have the cap space to bring in Rodgers and Adams

Denver and Miami have a ton of cap space for next year. There's a few others in the top 15 cap situations that probably could make moves to make it happen.

That all being said, I expect them both to be in GB next year. Even if they have to tag Adams

(10-19-2021, 03:45 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]

(10-19-2021, 03:31 PM)scottyg Wrote: [ -> ]I'm sure Aaron would be more than happy to take less money if it meant the team could afford to sign Adams.

Since when has Rodgers ever done that?? Rodgers ain't Brady. Other than Brady what other QB takes less money to help out his team?

a subtle whoosh, notice the font choice.

@I prefer these for sarcasm@