Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: "Legitimate political discourse"
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Here's the full statement.

https://context-cdn.washingtonpost.com/n...1e.#page=1

The paragraph getting all the attention is at the bottom of the last page.
Dude. You should never put up a link that is a download. People click on that [BLEEP] and BAM!!! Who knows what you put in my PC.
(02-05-2022, 11:41 AM)Jagwired Wrote: [ -> ]Dude. You should never put up a link that is a download. People click on that [BLEEP] and BAM!!! Who knows what you put in my PC.

Yep. My PC is now pregnant, smoking two packs of camel's per day and just asked me if I wanted to go 50/50 on the rent to some studio apartment in a trailer park that Mr. Trojan owns. 

Thanks a lot, mikesez.
(02-05-2022, 11:55 AM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-05-2022, 11:41 AM)Jagwired Wrote: [ -> ]Dude. You should never put up a link that is a download. People click on that [BLEEP] and BAM!!! Who knows what you put in my PC.

Yep. My PC is now pregnant, smoking two packs of camel's per day and just asked me if I wanted to go 50/50 on the rent to some studio apartment in a trailer park that Mr. Trojan owns. 

Thanks a lot, mikesez.

hahahaha
(02-05-2022, 11:41 AM)Jagwired Wrote: [ -> ]Dude. You should never put up a link that is a download. People click on that [BLEEP] and BAM!!! Who knows what you put in my PC.

Here's the quote.  
Calls the Jan 6 committee a "Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens who engaged in legitimate political discourse."

Who were these "ordinary citizens"?
What was their "legitimate political discourse"?
(02-05-2022, 12:33 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-05-2022, 11:41 AM)Jagwired Wrote: [ -> ]Dude. You should never put up a link that is a download. People click on that [BLEEP] and BAM!!! Who knows what you put in my PC.

Here's the quote.  
Calls the Jan 6 committee a "Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens who engaged in legitimate political discourse."

Who were these "ordinary citizens"?
What was their "legitimate political discourse"?

They're your fellow citizens.

Protesting the egregious election irregularities of the 2020 election.

This is not hard, you're just intentionally obtuse as always.
(02-05-2022, 12:37 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-05-2022, 12:33 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Here's the quote.  
Calls the Jan 6 committee a "Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens who engaged in legitimate political discourse."

Who were these "ordinary citizens"?
What was their "legitimate political discourse"?

They're your fellow citizens.

Protesting the egregious election irregularities of the 2020 election.

This is not hard, you're just intentionally obtuse as always.

No, they're a bunch of idiots who have been led to believe they can stop the certification of an election by invading the Capitol.  They weren't protesting.  They were actually trying to overturn the election.
...who were aided and abetted by the FBI. Who were entrapped, imprisoned, and maltreated by an institution wants to send a message to anyone that wants to stand against it.
(02-05-2022, 03:02 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-05-2022, 12:37 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]They're your fellow citizens.

Protesting the egregious election irregularities of the 2020 election.

This is not hard, you're just intentionally obtuse as always.

No, they're a bunch of idiots who have been led to believe they can stop the certification of an election by invading the Capitol.  They weren't protesting.  They were actually trying to overturn the election.

One man's idiot is another man's freedom fighter.
(02-05-2022, 03:02 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-05-2022, 12:37 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]They're your fellow citizens.

Protesting the egregious election irregularities of the 2020 election.

This is not hard, you're just intentionally obtuse as always.

No, they're a bunch of idiots who have been led to believe they can stop the certification of an election by invading the Capitol.  They weren't protesting.  They were actually trying to overturn the election.

Do you believe everyone who attends a BLM protest does so as an excuse to burn buildings and overturn police cars?  Is the intent of some the intent of all?
This horse is dead. Why keep beating it?
(02-05-2022, 12:37 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-05-2022, 12:33 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Here's the quote.  
Calls the Jan 6 committee a "Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens who engaged in legitimate political discourse."

Who were these "ordinary citizens"?
What was their "legitimate political discourse"?

They're your fellow citizens.

Protesting the egregious election irregularities of the 2020 election.

This is not hard, you're just intentionally obtuse as always.

So riots are legitimate political discourse? Attacking police with flagpoles and fire extinguishers, pushing through police lines, pushing past metal detectors, breaking windows and walking through, all while saying you are looking for sitting members of Congress, is all legitimate political discourse? Is that what they meant?
(02-05-2022, 04:33 PM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-05-2022, 03:02 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]No, they're a bunch of idiots who have been led to believe they can stop the certification of an election by invading the Capitol.  They weren't protesting.  They were actually trying to overturn the election.

Do you believe everyone who attends a BLM protest does so as an excuse to burn buildings and overturn police cars?  Is the intent of some the intent of all?

No, nobody believes that.  
I'll grant the point that some of the people who came to the Capitol grounds did not trespass and were not violent.  
But does that mean we can't bring them in for questioning? If we know they were there, and we know that they agreed with the insurrectionists about who rightfully won the election, doesn't it make sense to question them?

(02-05-2022, 03:05 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]...who were aided and abetted by the FBI. Who were entrapped, imprisoned, and maltreated by an institution wants to send a message to anyone that wants to stand against it.

If you really believe that, don't you think inquiry would expose it?
Your faith is admirable.
(02-05-2022, 04:33 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]This horse is dead. Why keep beating it?

It's called tenderizing.

It makes for good eaten'
(02-05-2022, 04:33 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]This horse is dead. Why keep beating it?

To deflect and divert attention from the reality of what is really going on in this country now.

If a person believes that the election was stolen at the ballot box, then Jan 6th is just [BLEEP]-for-tat.

LOL it censored that word
(02-07-2022, 11:36 AM)NewJagsCity Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-05-2022, 04:33 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]This horse is dead. Why keep beating it?

To deflect and divert attention from the reality of what is really going on in this country now.

If a person believes that the election was stolen at the ballot box, then Jan 6th is just [BLEEP]-for-tat.

LOL it censored that word

Bleep for tat makes it sound petty.

There are few things more serious than a stolen election.  If you let them steal one, there's no telling when or if your vote would ever count again.  If someone actually did steal an election, I would hope for massive boycotts and walkouts.  Make March 2020 look like a vacation.  

The reason we keep talking about Jan 6 is that the investigation hasn't concluded yet.
(02-05-2022, 04:41 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-05-2022, 12:37 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]They're your fellow citizens.

Protesting the egregious election irregularities of the 2020 election.

This is not hard, you're just intentionally obtuse as always.

So riots are legitimate political discourse? Attacking police with flagpoles and fire extinguishers, pushing through police lines, pushing past metal detectors, breaking windows and walking through, all while saying you are looking for sitting members of Congress, is all legitimate political discourse? Is that what they meant?

Sometimes.