04-21-2022, 03:25 AM
(04-21-2022, 01:53 AM)StrayaJag Wrote: [ -> ]Wots everyone think of Daniel Faalele
He's overweight, slow footed, has poor balance and shows sloppy technique.
(04-21-2022, 01:53 AM)StrayaJag Wrote: [ -> ]Wots everyone think of Daniel Faalele
(04-21-2022, 03:25 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ](04-21-2022, 01:53 AM)StrayaJag Wrote: [ -> ]Wots everyone think of Daniel Faalele
He's overweight, slow footed, has poor balance and shows sloppy technique.
(04-21-2022, 03:51 AM)StrayaJag Wrote: [ -> ](04-21-2022, 03:25 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]He's overweight, slow footed, has poor balance and shows sloppy technique.
Lol what a scathing review
I guess ill just support him still as a fellow aussie
basicallg only reason colleges picked him up apparently was becauze of his size.... read recently that he knew jack [BLEEP] about nfl
(04-21-2022, 03:51 AM)StrayaJag Wrote: [ -> ](04-21-2022, 03:25 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]He's overweight, slow footed, has poor balance and shows sloppy technique.
Lol what a scathing review
I guess ill just support him still as a fellow aussie
basicallg only reason colleges picked him up apparently was becauze of his size.... read recently that he knew jack [BLEEP] about nfl
(04-21-2022, 09:33 AM)Mikey Wrote: [ -> ](04-21-2022, 03:51 AM)StrayaJag Wrote: [ -> ]Lol what a scathing review
I guess ill just support him still as a fellow aussie
basicallg only reason colleges picked him up apparently was becauze of his size.... read recently that he knew jack [BLEEP] about nfl
I see him as the epitome of a boom or bust pick - if he hits, you look the genius. if he misses, you probably threw away a day 2 pick swinging for the fences.
He's a project, for sure. He needs to go somewhere that does well teaching and conditioning their linemen, or somewhere that the coach is crafty enough to scheme around any shortcomings while he learns the position. If he's not immediately thrust into a starting role, he may be better off in the long run.
(04-21-2022, 08:15 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]Metchie and Watson are my top 2 guys right now at 33
https://www.nfl.com/videos/could-christi...-the-draft
(04-27-2022, 09:58 AM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]I love Skyy so even though I think he is a bad fit with what we currently have on our team I would still be stoked to get him.
https://twitter.com/PatKerrane/status/15...7542348801
(04-27-2022, 10:18 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ](04-27-2022, 09:58 AM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]I love Skyy so even though I think he is a bad fit with what we currently have on our team I would still be stoked to get him.
https://twitter.com/PatKerrane/status/15...7542348801
I like him too, but how many slot receivers do we need? Kirk certainly can't play outside.
(04-27-2022, 02:50 PM)The_Franchise_QB Wrote: [ -> ]Watson at 33 all day long.
(04-27-2022, 10:44 AM)jaglou53 Wrote: [ -> ]Moore would ideally be a slot receiver, however he is capable of playing on the outside. He was used both ways in college. His combination of great route running, quickness to beat the jam, huge hands and leaping ability are very appealing. I'd have no problem if the Jaguars take him at the top of round 2, although Linderbaum would be my top choice if he drops.
(04-27-2022, 03:06 PM)rpr52121 Wrote: [ -> ](04-27-2022, 02:50 PM)The_Franchise_QB Wrote: [ -> ]Watson at 33 all day long.
Isn't that too high for Watson?
I figure he was more mid/late 2nd round pick that the Jags would trade up for.
(04-27-2022, 10:44 AM)jaglou53 Wrote: [ -> ]Moore would ideally be a slot receiver, however he is capable of playing on the outside. He was used both ways in college. His combination of great route running, quickness to beat the jam, huge hands and leaping ability are very appealing. I'd have no problem if the Jaguars take him at the top of round 2, although Linderbaum would be my top choice if he drops.
I think I'm the exception the Linderbaum love. Everything I've heard is that he is very scheme specific.
I know Pedersen won with Kelce who is Linderbaum's ceiling, but taking a scheme specific center who cannot really help out at Guard in a pinch in a long season is a luxury at #33 that the Jags cannot afford.
(04-27-2022, 02:26 PM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: [ -> ](04-21-2022, 03:25 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]He's overweight, slow footed, has poor balance and shows sloppy technique.
My wife just said that about me last night.
(04-27-2022, 04:28 PM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ](04-27-2022, 03:06 PM)rpr52121 Wrote: [ -> ]Isn't that too high for Watson?
I figure he was more mid/late 2nd round pick that the Jags would trade up for.
I think I'm the exception the Linderbaum love. Everything I've heard is that he is very scheme specific.
I know Pedersen won with Kelce who is Linderbaum's ceiling, but taking a scheme specific center who cannot really help out at Guard in a pinch in a long season is a luxury at #33 that the Jags cannot afford.
1. Watson's hype has cooled off pretty dramatically since the combine, fortunately. Huge drop rate, very small route tree, advanced age, bad competition...tons of red flags. Still wouldn't be a shock if some team ignored all that and rolled the dice on him earlier than currently expected though.
2. Linderbaum is going to be very scheme specific, more than half the teams in the league won't be interested in him simply because of his size and very short arms. That said, our scheme is one that Linderbaum was made for. If he's there at 33 I think they will be very interested (even if i predicted that he would be there and we'd pass in my call your shot thread).
(04-27-2022, 02:50 PM)The_Franchise_QB Wrote: [ -> ]Watson at 33 all day long.
(04-28-2022, 06:55 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: [ -> ]Since the combine is actually where his stock has picked up not fell.