09-09-2016, 04:40 PM
Pages: 1 2
09-09-2016, 05:01 PM
Good article. Thanks for positing.
09-09-2016, 05:12 PM
They were talking a little about this on TimTim today.
The short of it was Blake is getting to the point where he's thinking the same way the coaches do - that as he breaks the huddle he's aware of how they will attack a particular look, and what they want to change to get out of a situation, or move to attack an opportunity. As the article states, not just order taking from the sideline.
Great to hear.
The short of it was Blake is getting to the point where he's thinking the same way the coaches do - that as he breaks the huddle he's aware of how they will attack a particular look, and what they want to change to get out of a situation, or move to attack an opportunity. As the article states, not just order taking from the sideline.
Great to hear.
09-09-2016, 05:16 PM
HOTD took thread lessons.
Good thread. Would read again. 10/10
Good thread. Would read again. 10/10
09-09-2016, 05:21 PM
HOTD for Mod
09-09-2016, 05:22 PM
Quote:HOTD took thread lessons.
Good thread. Would read again. 10/10
There's this saying about the rays of the nearest star to earth and the frequency from which the illumination of the posterior section of the canine species comes to mind.
09-09-2016, 05:30 PM
Based on this article what kinds of improvements should we expect to see?
09-09-2016, 06:59 PM
Quote:Good article. Thanks for positing.Ur welcome my dear..
09-09-2016, 11:38 PM
Quote:There's this saying about the rays of the nearest star to earth and the frequency from which the illumination of the posterior section of the canine species comes to mind.
And this post reminds me that there is more than one way the pelt of a domestic feline can be removed.
09-09-2016, 11:42 PM
Quote:And this post reminds me that there is more than one way the pelt of a domestic feline can be removed.
Domestic felines don't have pelts.
09-10-2016, 12:11 AM
Quote:Based on this article what kinds of improvements should we expect to see?
Command of the offense, less interceptions, higher completion percentage, and more audibling out of bad plays.
09-10-2016, 06:51 AM
Quote:Domestic felines don't have pelts.
<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.dictionary.com/browse/pelt?s=t'>http://www.dictionary.com/browse/pelt?s=t</a>
pelt - /pɛlt/ - noun
1.the skin of a fur-bearing animal, such as a mink, esp when it has been removed from the carcass
2.the hide of an animal, stripped of hair and ready for tanning
Explain to me why house cats do not have pelts.
09-10-2016, 07:51 AM
Quote:They were talking a little about this on TimTim today.
The short of it was Blake is getting to the point where he's thinking the same way the coaches do - that as he breaks the huddle he's aware of how they will attack a particular look, and what they want to change to get out of a situation, or move to attack an opportunity. As the article states, not just order taking from the sideline.
Great to hear.
Gee wiz,
Reading this would make me think there is actually some benefit to schematic continuity.
Whoda thunkit?
09-10-2016, 08:08 AM
It was a good read, but wouldn't you be able to say the same words about any young qb that has played in the same system more than a year?
09-10-2016, 10:11 AM
Quote:<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.dictionary.com/browse/pelt?s=t'>http://www.dictionary.com/browse/pelt?s=t</a>
pelt - /pɛlt/ - noun
1.the skin of a fur-bearing animal, such as a mink, esp when it has been removed from the carcass
2.the hide of an animal, stripped of hair and ready for tanning
Explain to me why house cats do not have pelts.
Obviously your definitions only apply to animals that are killed for their fur, which does not include domestic cats.
09-10-2016, 10:22 AM
Quote:Obviously your definitions only apply to animals that are killed for their fur, which does not include domestic cats.
"The skin of a fur bearing animal"... that's a cat. Regardless of what it is/isn't used for.
Only the second definition implies being used for anything.
09-10-2016, 10:27 AM
Quote:"The skin of a fur bearing animal"... that's a cat. Regardless of what it is/isn't used for.
Only the second definition implies being used for anything.
So "especially when it has been removed from the carcass" does not imply the animal will be killed for fur trade?
09-10-2016, 10:33 AM
Quote:Obviously your definitions only apply to animals that are killed for their fur, which does not include domestic cats.
Apparently, the Chinese don't share that same sentiment and you've never heard of Dr Chang who wrote the children's fable " The Cat is the Hat ".... It starts out like this.. " Lu Feng has a big fat cat, She thinks it'd make a lovely hat"....
![[Image: 071d4b1ff59af87ea461.jpeg]](http://img.scoop.co.nz/stories/images/1306/071d4b1ff59af87ea461.jpeg)
They seem to be real popular in Austrailia...
![[Image: tumblr_inline_o4f1w4gyIQ1thtuu3_1280.png]](https://66.media.tumblr.com/18c684d151dfd208b0e01138b967c898/tumblr_inline_o4f1w4gyIQ1thtuu3_1280.png)
09-10-2016, 10:40 AM
Quote:So "especially when it has been removed from the carcass" does not imply the animal will be killed for fur trade?no
09-10-2016, 10:41 AM
Quote:So "especially when it has been removed from the carcass" does not imply the animal will be killed for fur trade?
It means that it can be, not that it must be used for that. Plus, as mentioned, people absolutely use domestic cat furs for things. Just not so much in the US
Pages: 1 2