Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
(02-12-2023, 09:52 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ] (02-12-2023, 09:49 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]Girl just had a baby. If she's preggers again that's a quick turnaround.
She had her baby in May of 2022
My mom had me in July 85. My brother in October of 86 and my other brother March of 88.
Ah, I thought it was in the last few months. Goes to show how much I pay attention to celebrity news. Lol
(02-12-2023, 09:56 PM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ] (02-12-2023, 09:52 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]I was thinking the same thing, plus they had to get it all set up in 10 minutes. Very impressive.
Our 2nd and 3rd ones were separated by one year, to the day.
Damn, two kids with the same b-day? That’s cool!
My daughter and I are separated by 1 day. I thought that was cool. But that takes the cake.
And the oldest by 3 days before theirs, but a two year separation there. Big money saver because we threw one big birthday party for all three on the same day.
Why on earth would you use a new type of turf/grass on the field for the Super bowl?
(02-12-2023, 10:00 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ] (02-12-2023, 09:56 PM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ]Damn, two kids with the same b-day? That’s cool!
My daughter and I are separated by 1 day. I thought that was cool. But that takes the cake.
And the oldest by 3 days before theirs, but a two year separation there. Big money saver because we threw one big birthday party for all three on the same day.
Like having 2 Christmas’ I bet. Makes one wonder, what was happening 9 months before that… something had you and the Mrs all worked up each year, haha.
The field definitely sucks.
Who were the idiots that prepped this field? They are looking like fools.
There are some nice throws and catches being made tonight by Eagles players.
If Chris Jones name is not called this second half, the Chiefs will lose.
Uh oh. Where have we seen a deep ball against the Chefs dropped before? Philly beware.
I’m thinking catch…
Eh…. Maybe not.
I don't think there is enough to overturn either way. Will just stand, and probably would have stood if called incomplete.
However, what is the rule that if the rule ends in the bench area, the defense has to be allowed to substitute? That seems like a silly rule.
I seriously hate the ridiculousness of the rules on catch vs incompletion
Sheesh - they make it so much more complex than it needs to be.
If they overturn this, I'm going to change the channel. Was that a dead ball foul on the following play? I didn't quite understand that. If it wasn't then they shouldn't be able to request a review.
That commercial with the on hold music is hilarious. Ive called so many numbers and have gotten it. Especially goverment numbers.
(02-12-2023, 10:12 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]I seriously hate the ridiculousness of the rules on catch vs incompletion
Sheesh - they make it so much more complex than it needs to be.
I mean if we are going by the feel, the Eagles fumble/incompletion return for TD was a catch in my eyes. I get it was not by the rule though.
Yeah, like rpr said. Would have been upheld either way it seems. That one toe was close
(02-12-2023, 10:12 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]I seriously hate the ridiculousness of the rules on catch vs incompletion
Sheesh - they make it so much more complex than it needs to be.
It all started with that Dez Bryant catch against the Packers years ago. Refs made a horrible call and the league has been a disaster with it ever since.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12