(03-29-2023, 10:37 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (03-29-2023, 08:37 PM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]LOL. His speech? This straw just gets thinner every time you grasp for it.
It's not like Trump broke in the windows and shat on Pelosi's desk. He told others to do so, which is still illegal.
Dood.. If I ever do something crazy and wind up in court, I need you as a prosecuting attorney.. Hell, I could even represent myself and save some coin!
(03-29-2023, 10:29 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (03-29-2023, 09:54 PM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]The answer to your question can be found in your second sentence.
P.S. If you still can't figure it out, let me know and I'll give you another clue.
Which is why I never complain or comment about anyone here acting smart or acting dumb. Sometimes some of you come across as unintelligent to me, but I don't comment on it. Sometimes some of you come across as very intelligent and knowledgeable to me, and I rarely comment on that either. Because there's no way I'm getting the full picture of anyone's intelligence in a political conversation with text only. Some of you think you've got the full picture of me though, and don't mind saying so.
A swing and a miss, but hey, thanks for playing. Would you like another clue?
(03-30-2023, 08:24 AM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ] (03-29-2023, 10:29 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Which is why I never complain or comment about anyone here acting smart or acting dumb. Sometimes some of you come across as unintelligent to me, but I don't comment on it. Sometimes some of you come across as very intelligent and knowledgeable to me, and I rarely comment on that either. Because there's no way I'm getting the full picture of anyone's intelligence in a political conversation with text only. Some of you think you've got the full picture of me though, and don't mind saying so.
A swing and a miss, but hey, thanks for playing. Would you like another clue?
You're saying that WingerDinger might be smarter than most people, and I might not realize it. And my response more than allows for that possibility.
If you intended to say something else, you're communicating very poorly, and turning your poor communication into a guessing game is far from endearing.
Earlier on, maybe 6-7 months ago, I said that I was for DeSantis.
After today's events, I've changed my mind..
Trump 2024!
![[Image: donald-trump-thumbs-up.gif]](https://s10.gifyu.com/images/donald-trump-thumbs-up.gif)
(03-30-2023, 05:44 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]Earlier on, maybe 6-7 months ago, I said that I was for DeSantis.
After today's events, I've changed my mind..
Trump 2024!
Some people just can't resist that bad boy appeal. They want to be bad too.
(03-30-2023, 06:12 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (03-30-2023, 05:44 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]Earlier on, maybe 6-7 months ago, I said that I was for DeSantis.
After today's events, I've changed my mind..
Trump 2024!
Some people just can't resist that bad boy appeal. They want to be bad too.
They've angered way more people than they've appeased.
Even if we are not sure that Trump had sex with Daniels, and even if we are not sure that she or the tabloid actually took the money Trump offered, we are sure that Trump tried to give both of them money in an effort to buy their silence. The rest is details.
Unfortunately those details include intricacies of New York State law that is very hard to understand. Depending which paragraph they decide this falls under, the penalties could be a $10,000 fine, or up to 364 days in jail, or up to 5 years in jail.
Rest assured Trump will continue campaigning while on trial, and, if convicted, while in jail.
Alan Dershowitz seems to think that the Statute of Limitations has been exceeded on this.
(03-30-2023, 06:16 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ] (03-30-2023, 06:12 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Some people just can't resist that bad boy appeal. They want to be bad too.
They've angered way more people than they've appeased.
Most if not all of the angered people were angry to begin with. It'll probably not influence who they'd vote for in the general election. If it's Desantis, they'll vote for him, if it's Trump, they'll vote for him.
You could say he might pick up some votes in the primaries but if Trump gets the nomination, he would have most likely gotten it anyway.
Nothing really changes. Unless you think it will make Democrats and independents vote for Trump in the general.
(03-30-2023, 06:51 PM)MarleyJag Wrote: [ -> ] (03-30-2023, 06:16 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]They've angered way more people than they've appeased.
Most if not all of the angered people were angry to begin with. It'll probably not influence who they'd vote for in the general election. If it's Desantis, they'll vote for him, if it's Trump, they'll vote for him.
You could say he might pick up some votes in the primaries but if Trump gets the nomination, he would have most likely gotten it anyway.
Nothing really changes. Unless you think it will make Democrats and independents vote for Trump in the general.
Very true as well..
Personally, I think it's more of a "Look over here!"..
Just to get attention off of transgender terrorism.
(03-30-2023, 06:52 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ] (03-30-2023, 06:51 PM)MarleyJag Wrote: [ -> ]Most if not all of the angered people were angry to begin with. It'll probably not influence who they'd vote for in the general election. If it's Desantis, they'll vote for him, if it's Trump, they'll vote for him.
You could say he might pick up some votes in the primaries but if Trump gets the nomination, he would have most likely gotten it anyway.
Nothing really changes. Unless you think it will make Democrats and independents vote for Trump in the general.
Very true as well..
Personally, I think it's more of a "Look over here!"..
Just to get attention off of transgender terrorism.
District attorneys might be trying to win new cycles.
But grand juries don't.
(03-30-2023, 06:59 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (03-30-2023, 06:52 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]Very true as well..
Personally, I think it's more of a "Look over here!"..
Just to get attention off of transgender terrorism.
District attorneys might be trying to win new cycles.
But grand juries don't.
Yeah, this already reaks of a fair indictment lolol
Edit:
(03-30-2023, 06:59 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (03-30-2023, 06:52 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]Very true as well..
Personally, I think it's more of a "Look over here!"..
Just to get attention off of transgender terrorism.
District attorneys might be trying to win new cycles.
But grand juries don't.
Bruh, did you hear that girl from ga.
Well here we go all but guarantees Trump is the GOP nominee, ugh.
(03-30-2023, 07:07 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]When you can politicize the justice system, you've taken us into Banana Republic territory.
This isn't good for any party..
Still voting Trump now, but also, still love my Gov!!
https://twitter.com/GovRonDeSantis/statu...7PKNA&s=19
We're getting a full second term now.
Wow.
I'll be honest. I'm a little shook by this. The word was they were out to he 24th, looked like they were getting cold feet. This is sad.
There's no way Trump can win the general now. This is all just a pretext for a Jessie smollette type "attack" on Bragg for another round of George Floyd type riots. @ this moment I have absolutely no faith left in the system. I just wanted to feed my family!!!
(03-30-2023, 07:36 PM)jj82284 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-30-2023, 06:59 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]District attorneys might be trying to win new cycles.
But grand juries don't.
Bruh, did you hear that girl from ga.
If it's not on foxnews.com or CNN.com or npr.org rest assured I don't know about it. I have a much easier time understanding writing than speaking amd I find there are fewer lies per minute when they put it out there for you to peruse at your own pace.
What did you hear and why does it matter?