*This is just after it finished so we are taking 2 hours old. Damn! Shows you that people want to see the real news.
*The liberal media is already doing damage control. There are stories out before the interview even started saying it was a disaster before it even stated.
*There was also a Ddos attack before it started to try and stop it.
*Trump talked for 2 hours off script.
Crazy viewership!
*Yes, he used some of his usual rhetoric but to an audience who many have not heard his plans.
*Enforces my and millions of others vote with a guy who is flawed but will put Americans first.
*no teleprompter just raw taking
*Elon offered Harris the same opportunity to do the same type of interview but of course she declined. Aka she ran!
(08-12-2024, 11:30 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Should make this a frequent thing until the election.
Yeah, too old to be president.
https://twitter.com/_johnnymaga/status/1...p63OA&s=19
They pulled out the project 2025 made up crap again.
I see some memes for project 2025 coming where Trump takes us back to the 50s and everyone joins around their phones to listen to the weekly presidential update on x spaces.
Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
If there was a ddos attack, those viewer/listener numbers could be inflated by that, no? I find it difficult to believe 76 million Americans tuned in. Perhaps there were others around the world interested enough to tune in to get it to that number or a chunk of it was the ddos attack. I tuned in for a bit, but couldn't get in for a while. That said, he already has my vote so it wasn't needed to sway me.
The contrast between the 2 candidates is stunningly stark though. One is hiding from the media or when she does interact with them it's with those media members that are actually Democratic operatives and in her pocket and the whole thing is scripted theater. The other will sit down for hours long conversations or even go into that same Democratic operative media tirelessly to be able to get the opportunity to talk directly to the American people and verbally bodyslam hostile "journalists". I'm sure the founders did not envision a scenario where a candidate and party would virtually not have to campaign and would instead rely their operatives in the media to carry them over the finish line as they also did in 2020. I have a feeling they would feel that to be a threat to democracy.
Envision yourself the head of a large national corporation and you're hiring a project manager for a multi-year project that's set to start in a few months and can't be delayed. You've been presented with 2 candidates that have met the initial criteria. If you unfortunately don't like either, your timeline prevents you from starting the process over from scratch, so you must pick one of them. You sit down to interview Harris and Trump. There's absolutely no way in hell that Kamala gets the nod in this scenario and this isn't some corporate multi-year project, this is an interview to be the leader of the free world and to be the head of many multi-year projects.
I don't buy the current polls for a second. There is no real enthusiasm for Harris. There is manufactured enthusiasm to the point that even her official social media campaign account is pushing out AI altered crowd images. She can't fill an arena herself, so she has to appear on stage at a hip hop concert and then make it look like a campaign rally. Keep in mind that even Democratic candidates that have lost the presidential election have generally historically led in the polls leading up to the election. You have to wonder if there is intention behind that or if it's just that left leaning individuals are more likely to respond to polls. The only polls that matter, though, are the election itself and exit polling to make sure the result lines up with what you're finding after the fact. In a fair election with a true and fair media, Trump cleans her clock on election day. Let's hope that ends up being the case because I don't want to see another highly suspicious election result because I have a feeling if she actually wins there will be some unexplainable anomalies again. The Democrats have openly weaponized all facets of government. Why wouldn't they weaponize whatever was necessary to stay in power?
Such a great sit down interview!!
https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status...fh6Sg&s=19
MUSK: “I’ve not been very political before… they try to paint me as a far right guy which is absurd because I like to make electric vehicles… I supported Obama. I stood in line for 6 hours to shake Obama’s hand… historically I was a moderate Democrat. But now I feel like we’re at a critical juncture for the country… For the people out there in the moderate camp, I think you should support Donald Trump for president.”
(08-13-2024, 07:54 AM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: [ -> ]If there was a ddos attack, those viewer/listener numbers could be inflated by that, no? I find it difficult to believe 76 million Americans tuned in. Perhaps there were others around the world interested enough to tune in to get it to that number or a chunk of it was the ddos attack. I tuned in for a bit, but couldn't get in for a while. That said, he already has my vote so it wasn't needed to sway me.
The contrast between the 2 candidates is stunningly stark though. One is hiding from the media or when she does interact with them it's with those media members that are actually Democratic operatives and in her pocket and the whole thing is scripted theater. The other will sit down for hours long conversations or even go into that same Democratic operative media tirelessly to be able to get the opportunity to talk directly to the American people and verbally bodyslam hostile "journalists". I'm sure the founders did not envision a scenario where a candidate and party would virtually not have to campaign and would instead rely their operatives in the media to carry them over the finish line as they also did in 2020. I have a feeling they would feel that to be a threat to democracy.
Envision yourself the head of a large national corporation and you're hiring a project manager for a multi-year project that's set to start in a few months and can't be delayed. You've been presented with 2 candidates that have met the initial criteria. If you unfortunately don't like either, your timeline prevents you from starting the process over from scratch, so you must pick one of them. You sit down to interview Harris and Trump. There's absolutely no way in hell that Kamala gets the nod in this scenario and this isn't some corporate multi-year project, this is an interview to be the leader of the free world and to be the head of many multi-year projects.
I don't buy the current polls for a second. There is no real enthusiasm for Harris. There is manufactured enthusiasm to the point that even her official social media campaign account is pushing out AI altered crowd images. She can't fill an arena herself, so she has to appear on stage at a hip hop concert and then make it look like a campaign rally. Keep in mind that even Democratic candidates that have lost the presidential election have generally historically led in the polls leading up to the election. You have to wonder if there is intention behind that or if it's just that left leaning individuals are more likely to respond to polls. The only polls that matter, though, are the election itself and exit polling to make sure the result lines up with what you're finding after the fact. In a fair election with a true and fair media, Trump cleans her clock on election day. Let's hope that ends up being the case because I don't want to see another highly suspicious election result because I have a feeling if she actually wins there will be some unexplainable anomalies again. The Democrats have openly weaponized all facets of government. Why wouldn't they weaponize whatever was necessary to stay in power?
Sorry, no logical thinking allowed, only praise for our Dear Leader!
(08-13-2024, 08:50 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (08-13-2024, 07:54 AM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: [ -> ]If there was a ddos attack, those viewer/listener numbers could be inflated by that, no? I find it difficult to believe 76 million Americans tuned in. Perhaps there were others around the world interested enough to tune in to get it to that number or a chunk of it was the ddos attack. I tuned in for a bit, but couldn't get in for a while. That said, he already has my vote so it wasn't needed to sway me.
The contrast between the 2 candidates is stunningly stark though. One is hiding from the media or when she does interact with them it's with those media members that are actually Democratic operatives and in her pocket and the whole thing is scripted theater. The other will sit down for hours long conversations or even go into that same Democratic operative media tirelessly to be able to get the opportunity to talk directly to the American people and verbally bodyslam hostile "journalists". I'm sure the founders did not envision a scenario where a candidate and party would virtually not have to campaign and would instead rely their operatives in the media to carry them over the finish line as they also did in 2020. I have a feeling they would feel that to be a threat to democracy.
Envision yourself the head of a large national corporation and you're hiring a project manager for a multi-year project that's set to start in a few months and can't be delayed. You've been presented with 2 candidates that have met the initial criteria. If you unfortunately don't like either, your timeline prevents you from starting the process over from scratch, so you must pick one of them. You sit down to interview Harris and Trump. There's absolutely no way in hell that Kamala gets the nod in this scenario and this isn't some corporate multi-year project, this is an interview to be the leader of the free world and to be the head of many multi-year projects.
I don't buy the current polls for a second. There is no real enthusiasm for Harris. There is manufactured enthusiasm to the point that even her official social media campaign account is pushing out AI altered crowd images. She can't fill an arena herself, so she has to appear on stage at a hip hop concert and then make it look like a campaign rally. Keep in mind that even Democratic candidates that have lost the presidential election have generally historically led in the polls leading up to the election. You have to wonder if there is intention behind that or if it's just that left leaning individuals are more likely to respond to polls. The only polls that matter, though, are the election itself and exit polling to make sure the result lines up with what you're finding after the fact. In a fair election with a true and fair media, Trump cleans her clock on election day. Let's hope that ends up being the case because I don't want to see another highly suspicious election result because I have a feeling if she actually wins there will be some unexplainable anomalies again. The Democrats have openly weaponized all facets of government. Why wouldn't they weaponize whatever was necessary to stay in power?
Sorry, no logical thinking allowed, only praise for our Dear Leader!
Awwwwwww.. Poor little whiney rino lib!!
You mean not everyone shares your same idiotic, political lunacy?
Take your meds..
The MSM is a frail, dying animal. It's why they ask the White House to shut it down. X and independent journalism are the new MSM and that scares the [BLEEP] out of communists like Mike.
Meanwhile somewhere in a basement kakula is mumbling " Tonight I had dinner, dinner is the meal that comes after lunch, it usually has some meat and potatoes and veggies like collard greens you washed out in the tub, Mmmmm Mmmmm, Some people call it supper. After that you have dessert, it's usually something sweet" kakkle, kakkklle ,kakkle!!!
(08-13-2024, 09:32 AM)Jagwired Wrote: [ -> ]Meanwhile somewhere in a basement kakula is mumbling " Tonight I had dinner, dinner is the meal that comes after lunch, it usually has some meat and potatoes and veggies like collard greens you washed out in the tub, Mmmmm Mmmmm, Some people call it supper. After that you have dessert, it's usually something sweet" kakkle, kakkklle ,kakkle!!!
Perfect +1. I heard her voice reading these words..
(08-13-2024, 07:54 AM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: [ -> ]If there was a ddos attack, those viewer/listener numbers could be inflated by that, no? I find it difficult to believe 76 million Americans tuned in. Perhaps there were others around the world interested enough to tune in to get it to that number or a chunk of it was the ddos attack. I tuned in for a bit, but couldn't get in for a while. That said, he already has my vote so it wasn't needed to sway me.
The contrast between the 2 candidates is stunningly stark though. One is hiding from the media or when she does interact with them it's with those media members that are actually Democratic operatives and in her pocket and the whole thing is scripted theater. The other will sit down for hours long conversations or even go into that same Democratic operative media tirelessly to be able to get the opportunity to talk directly to the American people and verbally bodyslam hostile "journalists". I'm sure the founders did not envision a scenario where a candidate and party would virtually not have to campaign and would instead rely their operatives in the media to carry them over the finish line as they also did in 2020. I have a feeling they would feel that to be a threat to democracy.
Envision yourself the head of a large national corporation and you're hiring a project manager for a multi-year project that's set to start in a few months and can't be delayed. You've been presented with 2 candidates that have met the initial criteria. If you unfortunately don't like either, your timeline prevents you from starting the process over from scratch, so you must pick one of them. You sit down to interview Harris and Trump. There's absolutely no way in hell that Kamala gets the nod in this scenario and this isn't some corporate multi-year project, this is an interview to be the leader of the free world and to be the head of many multi-year projects.
I don't buy the current polls for a second. There is no real enthusiasm for Harris. There is manufactured enthusiasm to the point that even her official social media campaign account is pushing out AI altered crowd images. She can't fill an arena herself, so she has to appear on stage at a hip hop concert and then make it look like a campaign rally. Keep in mind that even Democratic candidates that have lost the presidential election have generally historically led in the polls leading up to the election. You have to wonder if there is intention behind that or if it's just that left leaning individuals are more likely to respond to polls. The only polls that matter, though, are the election itself and exit polling to make sure the result lines up with what you're finding after the fact. In a fair election with a true and fair media, Trump cleans her clock on election day. Let's hope that ends up being the case because I don't want to see another highly suspicious election result because I have a feeling if she actually wins there will be some unexplainable anomalies again. The Democrats have openly weaponized all facets of government. Why wouldn't they weaponize whatever was necessary to stay in power?
It all depends on how the attack was carried out. I would not be surprised at all if people from around the world watched it.
(08-13-2024, 10:44 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ] (08-13-2024, 09:10 AM)Jagwired Wrote: [ -> ]https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/182...7499310169
If Trump redirected his energy into more produced, less off-the-cuff content like this, he probably could probably negate some of his moderate voter problem. Unfortunately, it's not his style.
Off the cuff is not the issue, it’s the unnecessary childish insults.