Speak for yourself, learning the nuances of terminology on double and triple coverage is way more valuable reading than the 18,000 post about why press Taylor sucks.
(10-08-2024, 08:18 AM)HardcoreMoJagFan Wrote: [ -> ]Speak for yourself, learning the nuances of terminology on double and triple coverage is way more valuable reading than the 18,000 post about why press Taylor sucks.
depends on how you define 'sucks'
(10-08-2024, 08:18 AM)HardcoreMoJagFan Wrote: [ -> ]Speak for yourself, learning the nuances of terminology on double and triple coverage is way more valuable reading than the 18,000 post about why press Taylor sucks.
Fair enough.
I stand by my statement. The Lawrence INT was the "Ugly" of the game. It really isn't nuance when there are 3 defenders in the area that the QB is throwing to. But I'll let it go.
All of my posts, I point out that it's my opinion. If I'm wrong, I concede. If things I thought were bad become better, I acknowledge that they got better. I'm not a genius of football. I'm just giving my point of view. That's what this message board is all about.
I haven't mentioned that the OC is the problem for 2 weeks now... In fact, I've given praise to the play calling and HC/OC for 2 weeks now. Additionally, I have tried my hardest to stay on topic with the things I discuss.
If you disagree? Cool, I love discussing and even arguing with folks that don't agree with me. But I make sure I don't antagonize fellow fans. I wish others would take that advice.
(10-08-2024, 07:56 PM)carp8dm Wrote: [ -> ] (10-08-2024, 08:18 AM)HardcoreMoJagFan Wrote: [ -> ]Speak for yourself, learning the nuances of terminology on double and triple coverage is way more valuable reading than the 18,000 post about why press Taylor sucks.
Fair enough.
I stand by my statement. The Lawrence INT was the "Ugly" of the game. It really isn't nuance when there are 3 defenders in the area that the QB is throwing to. But I'll let it go.
All of my posts, I point out that it's my opinion. If I'm wrong, I concede. If things I thought were bad become better, I acknowledge that they got better. I'm not a genius of football. I'm just giving my point of view. That's what this message board is all about.
I haven't mentioned that the OC is the problem for 2 weeks now... In fact, I've given praise to the play calling and HC/OC for 2 weeks now. Additionally, I have tried my hardest to stay on topic with the things I discuss.
If you disagree? Cool, I love discussing and even arguing with folks that don't agree with me. But I make sure I don't antagonize fellow fans. I wish others would take that advice.
You called the play calling "obvious" yesterday and called Pederson "inept" a few days ago.
(10-08-2024, 07:56 PM)carp8dm Wrote: [ -> ] (10-08-2024, 08:18 AM)HardcoreMoJagFan Wrote: [ -> ]Speak for yourself, learning the nuances of terminology on double and triple coverage is way more valuable reading than the 18,000 post about why press Taylor sucks.
Fair enough.
I stand by my statement. The Lawrence INT was the "Ugly" of the game. It really isn't nuance when there are 3 defenders in the area that the QB is throwing to. But I'll let it go.
All of my posts, I point out that it's my opinion. If I'm wrong, I concede. If things I thought were bad become better, I acknowledge that they got better. I'm not a genius of football. I'm just giving my point of view. That's what this message board is all about.
I haven't mentioned that the OC is the problem for 2 weeks now... In fact, I've given praise to the play calling and HC/OC for 2 weeks now. Additionally, I have tried my hardest to stay on topic with the things I discuss.
If you disagree? Cool, I love discussing and even arguing with folks that don't agree with me. But I make sure I don't antagonize fellow fans. I wish others would take that advice.
I'm not calling anyone out. Just find the nuance debate on terminology interesting.
The int can be bad without saying it was triple coverage. It was in a tight window that was unnecessary to throw into. Still a bad choice but at least it was deep and not affecting field position.
(10-08-2024, 09:19 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ] (10-08-2024, 07:56 PM)carp8dm Wrote: [ -> ]Fair enough.
I stand by my statement. The Lawrence INT was the "Ugly" of the game. It really isn't nuance when there are 3 defenders in the area that the QB is throwing to. But I'll let it go.
All of my posts, I point out that it's my opinion. If I'm wrong, I concede. If things I thought were bad become better, I acknowledge that they got better. I'm not a genius of football. I'm just giving my point of view. That's what this message board is all about.
I haven't mentioned that the OC is the problem for 2 weeks now... In fact, I've given praise to the play calling and HC/OC for 2 weeks now. Additionally, I have tried my hardest to stay on topic with the things I discuss.
If you disagree? Cool, I love discussing and even arguing with folks that don't agree with me. But I make sure I don't antagonize fellow fans. I wish others would take that advice.
You called the play calling "obvious" yesterday and called Pederson "inept" a few days ago.
How
dare you remember what he said just 72 hours ago.
![[Image: giphy.webp]](https://media2.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExbnZoY2szZ3VjNTZpdWw5bmhqdWV1cGxxbml2czlkYnh5ZjExeDRvNiZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/U1aN4HTfJ2SmgB2BBK/giphy.webp)
(10-09-2024, 09:31 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (10-08-2024, 09:19 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]You called the play calling "obvious" yesterday and called Pederson "inept" a few days ago.
How dare you remember what he said just 72 hours ago.
Did I mention Press Taylor as the problem for the last 2 weeks?
Why are you guys like this? Seriously, I'm moving on. You guys just want to keep harping on the fact that I correctly pointed out that having the OC run the offense is not good. I have let it go. And you guys just can't stop baiting me.
I'm not falling for it.
Just move on, please. This is getting tiresome.
(10-09-2024, 06:55 PM)carp8dm Wrote: [ -> ] (10-09-2024, 09:31 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]How dare you remember what he said just 72 hours ago.
Did I mention Press Taylor as the problem for the last 2 weeks?
Why are you guys like this? Seriously, I'm moving on. You guys just want to keep harping on the fact that I correctly pointed out that having the OC run the offense is not good. I have let it go. And you guys just can't stop baiting me.
I'm not falling for it.
Just move on, please. This is getting tiresome.
I've been wondering the same thing for years.
(10-09-2024, 07:08 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (10-09-2024, 06:55 PM)carp8dm Wrote: [ -> ]Did I mention Press Taylor as the problem for the last 2 weeks?
Why are you guys like this? Seriously, I'm moving on. You guys just want to keep harping on the fact that I correctly pointed out that having the OC run the offense is not good. I have let it go. And you guys just can't stop baiting me.
I'm not falling for it.
Just move on, please. This is getting tiresome.
I've been wondering the same thing for years.
You only wonder because you don't accept that your arguments are wrong. Then when you finally "accept" defeat you turn around a few days later and go back to your same flawed position and pretend it never happened. Kinda like Carp is doing.