The rinos that voted in Garland also have a problem with Hegseth..
The rinos need to go..
(12-05-2024, 05:41 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]The rinos that voted in Garland also have a problem with Hegseth..
The rinos need to go..
Maybe they do. We call
elections to get rid of them, not Navy SEALs, though.
(12-05-2024, 06:13 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (12-05-2024, 05:41 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]The rinos that voted in Garland also have a problem with Hegseth..
The rinos need to go..
Maybe they do. We call elections to get rid of them, not Navy SEALs, though.
According to Elon, they'll be primaried and sent packing, just like Pig Cheney..
(12-05-2024, 06:29 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ] (12-05-2024, 06:13 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe they do. We call elections to get rid of them, not Navy SEALs, though.
According to Elon, they'll be primaried and sent packing, just like Pig Cheney..
Elon must have read Pelosi's book
(12-05-2024, 06:13 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (12-05-2024, 05:41 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]The rinos that voted in Garland also have a problem with Hegseth..
The rinos need to go..
Maybe they do. We call elections to get rid of them, not Navy SEALs, though.
They have a right to be heard. As long as it's peaceful who cares? They're not going to go in and physically force the RINOs out.
(12-05-2024, 08:30 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-05-2024, 06:13 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe they do. We call elections to get rid of them, not Navy SEALs, though.
They have a right to be heard. As long as it's peaceful who cares? They're not going to go in and physically force the RINOs out.
Of course.
But in this role they are citizens like you and me. I hope the article is about former SEALs because active duty service members cannot legally participate in partisan politics.
(12-05-2024, 08:50 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (12-05-2024, 08:30 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]They have a right to be heard. As long as it's peaceful who cares? They're not going to go in and physically force the RINOs out.
Of course.
But in this role they are citizens like you and me. I hope the article is about former SEALs because active duty service members cannot legally participate in partisan politics.
That's not entirely true.
Link
According to military law experts, DoD Directive 1344.10 dictates whether active-duty military members can participate in political activities, including protests and rallies.
That directive, they say,
does allow military members to personally engage in partisan activities, including writing letters to the editor for or against a specific candidate or attending events as spectators out of uniform.
But it
blocks them from leading or actively participating in those events, publishing partisan political statements outside of a letter to the editor, speaking at any political gathering or soliciting votes.
(12-05-2024, 09:03 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-05-2024, 08:50 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Of course.
But in this role they are citizens like you and me. I hope the article is about former SEALs because active duty service members cannot legally participate in partisan politics.
That's not entirely true.
Link
According to military law experts, DoD Directive 1344.10 dictates whether active-duty military members can participate in political activities, including protests and rallies.
That directive, they say, does allow military members to personally engage in partisan activities, including writing letters to the editor for or against a specific candidate or attending events as spectators out of uniform.
But it blocks them from leading or actively participating in those events, publishing partisan political statements outside of a letter to the editor, speaking at any political gathering or soliciting votes.
I wouldn't want active military engaged in rallies or demonstrations. Imagine if the January 6 protestors who invaded the Capitol had been active military and armed, organized and led by their officers.
(12-06-2024, 09:21 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ] (12-06-2024, 09:17 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]I wouldn't want active military engaged in rallies or demonstrations. Imagine if the January 6 protestors who invaded the Capitol had been active military and armed, organized and led by their officers.
Yes. That's the difference between a riot and a military coup.
(12-06-2024, 09:28 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ] (12-06-2024, 09:21 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]
Yes. That's the difference between a riot and a military coup.
Picture of TDSer milking January 6th for every last ounce of hyperbole.
![[Image: maxresdefault.jpg]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/HyEw9O5OG-Q/maxresdefault.jpg)
(12-06-2024, 09:37 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ] (12-06-2024, 09:28 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Yes. That's the difference between a riot and a military coup.
Picture of TDSer milking January 6th for every last ounce of hyperbole.
I don't want active-duty military trying to "take back our country" or "stop the steal" or anything else like that. Next think you know, some general would be on TV telling us they did it for the sake of saving our great nation from something.
(12-06-2024, 10:03 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-06-2024, 10:01 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]I don't want active-duty military trying to "take back our country" or "stop the steal" or anything else like that. Next think you know, some general would be on TV telling us they did it for the sake of saving our great nation from something.
We know you prefer this.
https://twitter.com/HHS_ASH/status/15375...o3PoA&s=19
So, your retort is that I would prefer two people taking a nice picture to a military coup? Which one would you prefer?
(12-06-2024, 10:06 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ] (12-06-2024, 10:03 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]We know you prefer this.
https://twitter.com/HHS_ASH/status/15375...o3PoA&s=19
So, your retort is that I would prefer two people taking a nice picture to a military coup? Which one would you prefer?
You’re trying hard to miss that point. He is saying you are fine with a soft coup as opposed to a violent one.
A coup is a coup.
(12-06-2024, 10:12 AM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ] (12-06-2024, 10:06 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]So, your retort is that I would prefer two people taking a nice picture to a military coup? Which one would you prefer?
You’re trying hard to miss that point. He is saying you are fine with a soft coup as opposed to a violent one.
A coup is a coup.
So the question is, would I prefer transgenders in the military to a violent military coup? Is that the question? He did use the word "prefer." So yes, if my choice was between transgender people in the military or a violent military coup, I would have to choose the former. Wouldn't you?
(12-06-2024, 10:03 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-06-2024, 10:01 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]I don't want active-duty military trying to "take back our country" or "stop the steal" or anything else like that. Next think you know, some general would be on TV telling us they did it for the sake of saving our great nation from something.
We know you prefer this.
https://twitter.com/HHS_ASH/status/15375...o3PoA&s=19
Isn't it funny that these low life scumbags on this site kept their mouths shut about the garbage that went on the last 4 years under Biden, but piss themselves over Trump appointments?
And they call themselves republicans lololololol
(12-06-2024, 10:12 AM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ] (12-06-2024, 10:06 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]So, your retort is that I would prefer two people taking a nice picture to a military coup? Which one would you prefer?
You’re trying hard to miss that point. He is saying you are fine with a soft coup as opposed to a violent one.
A coup is a coup.
Are you implying that transgender soldiers and officers are inherently illegitimate and not duly appointed or enlisted?